Heh, wasn't serious anyway. Though there is that McD/TB connection, I guess. Don't know how much they actually like each other.

Brady would choose SF first. They have everything. Raiders don't have a defense. Brady's stats are terrible. His advanced stats are awful.

He is being saved by a terrible division and the refs.

hope Tommy Tuck Rule goes to the 49ers and receives a career ending injury, since that team is a magnet for injuries

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Derek Carr is wearing a hand warmer in December…in a dome. <a href="https://t.co/omVmqCNyQW">pic.twitter.com/omVmqCNyQW</a></p>&mdash; Jets Today (@NYJetsToday_) <a href="https://twitter.com/NYJetsToday_/status/1601039580613918720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CtO7Mmgq1j8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

It’s not a dome and it gets cold af in there. My Twitter profile picture was from the inside of SoFi, it was ****ing freezing that game.

Then why haven’t you updated your w/l record yet? You’re .500 now right?

Damnit lol

You’re right, I always update it in the phone but never here.

9-9

1. KC @ SD 25-20 W (2001)
2. PHI @ KC 31-37 L (2005)
3. KC @ SD 9-20 L (2006)
4. KC @ SD 30-16 W (2007)
5. KC @ OAK 12-10 W (2007)
6. KC @ SD 43-14 L (2009)
7. SD @ KC 21-14 W (2010) Monday Night
8. KC @ SD 31-0 L (2010)
9. KC @ SD 20-17 L (2011)
10. KC @ SD 31-13 L (2012) Thurs. Night
11. KC @ SF 17-22 L (2014)
12. NYJ @ KC 3-24 W (2016)
13. KC @ SD 38-28 W (2018) Mahomes 1st game
14. KC @ LAR 51-54 L (2018) MNF
15. KC @ LAC 28-34 W (2021) OT TNF
16. CIN @ KC 24-27 L (2022) AFC
17. KC @ SF 44-23 W (2022)
18. KC @ LAC 30-27 W (2022) SNF

Nice!! Mahomes pulling your record up!

Mark got mocked by Family Guy. He is a legend now.

McDaniels to consider benching underperforming Carr

Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Alex Highsmith (56) sacks Las Vegas Raiders quarterback Derek Ca ...
Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Alex Highsmith (56) sacks Las Vegas Raiders quarterback Derek Carr (4) during the second half of an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Saturday, Dec. 24, 2022. (AP Photo/Don Wright)
By Vincent Bonsignore Las Vegas Review-Journal
December 26, 2022 - 12:58 pm

At a time when the Raiders need quarterback Derek Carr to play his best football, he’s playing his worst.

And while there are several reasons why Carr has thrown nine interceptions over his past five games and completed just 55 percent or fewer of his passes over his last four, there is no denying the fall-off.

Nor the role it’s played in the Raiders losing two out of their past three games to put their playoff hopes in severe distress.

“That’s not good enough, you know what I mean?” said Raiders coach Josh McDaniels. “And for us to be able to win this time of the year and be productive offensively, you have to throw the ball better than what we’ve thrown it at times here over the last month-and-a-half.”

When asked directly on Monday whether he would consider turning to backup Jarrett Stidham, McDaniels was non-committal.

“I think there’s a possibility that we would do the right thing, regardless of the position, in terms of the team,” McDaniels said.

Carr’s slide and the Raiders’ dire playoff predicament raise a question of whether the Raiders (6-9) should make a change at quarterback over the last two games to preserve their long-range options at the position.

The club faces a huge decision in mid-February whether to keep intact their relationship with Carr beyond the 2022 season or — and this is becoming more and more of a possibility — release or trade him to move on from the remainder of his contract without suffering a hefty financial blow.

Carr signed a 3-year, $121.5 million contract last offseason, but it includes an out at the end of this season in which the Raiders can move on while incurring just a $5.6 million dead cap hit.

There is no firm sense that the Raiders have made up their mind either way, although Carr’s recent play certainly has not helped his case.

Complicating matters is that Carr’s 2023 salary of $33 million and $7.5 million of his 2024 salary becomes guaranteed should he suffer a serious injury over the last two games. Is that a risk the Raiders should take?

McDaniels said there have been no discussions yet about how to handle Carr’s playing time. But he did say the club will take everything into account when making that decision.

That goes for a number of players, including those that are working their way back from injuries, such as Chandler Jones and Denzel Perryman, both of whom were hurt Saturday against the Steelers.

But almost certainly, Carr will fall into that category.

“I think there are a lot of things that are going to go into that bucket,” McDaniels said.

McDaniels went out of his way to spread the blame around to not single out Carr as the sole reason for the prolonged struggles. He mentioned the level of protection for Carr, the route running from receivers and the ability of everyone to be on the same page reading defensive coverages.

But football typically begins and ends with the play of the quarterback, and Carr has not been good enough recently.

“Everybody can do better, and I’m sure he’d be the first one to tell you he can do the same thing,” McDaniels said.

Contact Vincent Bonsignore at vbonsignore@reviewjournal.com. Follow @VinnyBonsignore on Twitter.

lmao

carr is nothing special but at least he took a team to the playoffs - twice!

mcdaniels is an insolent little peter principle **** who has never tasted the postseason unless he was suckling daddy belichick's tit

And he will ball out vs the Chiefs....

bullshit

Didn’t he take the Broncos to the playoffs with Tebow?