Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12520105)

Oh **** me, do your homework if you're going to talk out your ass.

Russell Wilson pre-dated Reid by 2 years. He was a Pioli ****up. Exactly when was he there for Reid to have but/for Smith's contract? If you can't even get THAT right I'm not sure how much any of us should give a shit about your brilliant insight.

And kindly direct me to all the guys that had Prescott pegged as a sure thing. The Cowboys struck lightening but had we taken him in the 4th, people would've bitched that we didn't take a first round QB. Oh, and but/for Romo AND Kellen Moore getting injured, Prescott isn't starting right now either. There's a lot of luck that went into the Cowboys falling into Prescott. They have little more invested in him than we had in Murray, Bray or Hogan.

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12520099)

Plus talent is better than average, not sure why you're stuck on that in particular... I'm not acting like its elite, but you're acting like he is some kind of friggin Ty Detmer noodle launcher

But you're on a roll with this subject today, so have at it... I guess Reid drafted Foles, then brought him here because he doesnt fit the scheme

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12520119)

I guess Reid agrees that Smith fits the scheme a lot better than Foles, afterall he invested a hell of a lot more to get Smith than he ever invested to get Foles.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12520112)

Completion% /= accuracy.

It's a fair proxy, but Smith's % improved because he understood timing/rhythm in the offense and became more conservative. He's no more capable of routinely putting the ball in a bucket than he ever was, he just chooses easier/smarter buckets to throw it at.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12520119)

I guess Reid agrees that Smith fits the scheme a lot better than Foles, afterall he invested a hell of a lot more to get Smith than he ever invested to get Foles.

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12520141)

None of that changes the fact that your assertion that Foles is a bad fit for this team is wrong

I knew this was never going to be a controversy in the first place, Reids been rolling with Smith for 3+ years now and is 15-2 in the last 17 games with him... you dont bench the guy who brought you to this point

Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12519646)

If the Chiefs throw Smith back out there in harm's way...I'll be looking forward to it.

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12520155)

Unless your name is Jim harbaugh and you got a big ol pair of balls.

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12520190)

Do you have any idea how reeruned you sound referring to anything about the 49ers situation under Harbaugh in reference to present-day Chiefs?

Every single bit of that scenario was a fail. They got to the SB in the short term because they were already too good a team all around at that point not to. But the QB decision was a key factor in their failure there and presaged a complete dissolution of pending dynasty.

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12520186)

It's funny for people who aren't from the bay SF fan's were literally calling in and cheering when smith lost the job to kap.

Chiefs fan's went full eeyore and didn't expect change anyways it's sad.

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12520195)

http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story/0...ut-a-bold-move

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...ver-alex-smith

Its a common chiefs fan misconception that you think 49er fans regret that trade They don't most fan's were glad to see him go.

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12520200)

very

I have watched him since 2005, wife is a niners fan...

I will give credit to him for breaking the 93 curse (no playoff win since 93). He was good enough to do that. That was pretty big. We need to build on that now.