ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 11 « First 4567 8 91011
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs What if Mahomes fails as an NFL QB? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=311869)

pugsnotdrugs19 11-28-2017 11:43 AM
I like this one too. Kyle Brandt says its time for the Chiefs to save their season before it is too late. ----> http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...e-their-season

Black Bob 11-28-2017 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13245409)
Because that Locker comparison that you keep throwing around is awful. The guy never completed more than 60% of his passes and wasn’t quite the arm talent that Mahomes is.
He was semi mobile with a big arm. He wasn't "clutch" in college. Never led many comebacks or game winning drives. He came from a similar system that created space for receivers to be wide open. The fact is that A&M's gimmick offense is well known and basically all the "experts" bring it up when talking about Mahomme's college completion percentage. It's easy to see if you watch the film. Almost Every play is a rub or pick. Also, Mahommes doesn't have an NFL completion percentage yet. Things aren't going to be the same as they were in college. Their backgrounds are very similar. Locker got the Fabre comparisons too. Again, Mahommes floor is Locker and his ceiling is Farve imo. Mahommes has potential and potential means he hasn't done anything yet. He can wow people with his arm but whether or not he can put a team on his back and carry them when they need it most is yet to be determined. That's why I wanted Watson. He did it in college and he's already done it in the pros. Mahommes has a lot to prove before I crown him. He is the epitome of a boom or bust prospect.

RunKC 11-28-2017 11:47 AM
I think a move could be made this time next week pending results from the NYJ game, but Andy probably isn't going to make a change until the Chiefs are completely out of first place, as shitty as that sounds.

BlackHelicopters 11-28-2017 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 13245724)
oh, so you really don't hate clay?
Posted via Mobile Device
Heh. The instrument has yet to be invented that measures my disdain for whatever name he is this week.
By the way, and I have said this before, you are my favorite poster.
No homo.
No sarcasm.

BlackHelicopters 11-28-2017 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loochy (Post 13245786)
q
Posted via Mobile Device
Wow? How did that happen. Never seen the phenomenon of the delayed double post. Must be a server thing. Someone contact Kyle.

RunKC 11-28-2017 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13245810)
Here is the video from this morning ---> http://www.nfl.com/videos/kansas-cit...es-this-season

Kay Adams kinda cut him off early on it, but he got some information out nonetheless. A lot of good videos on that page.
What the **** with some of these Analyst bullshit. My god.

"Uh uh Peterman! Look at what happened when Buffalo put in Peterman! He could throw tons of picks like Peterman did!"

Rausch 11-28-2017 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13245802)
I actually can envision a scenario where in 5-6 years we all look back at Alex Smith fondly. I imagine a scenario where Mahomes is shining as an 'elite' QB, and he credits Smith for helping him out his rookie year...
Too bad we have interviews with Smith saying the opposite...

KCrockaholic 11-28-2017 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13245827)
I think a move could be made this time next week pending results from the NYJ game, but Andy probably isn't going to make a change until the Chiefs are completely out of first place, as shitty as that sounds.
It's pretty strange to want to wait until there's no chance of the playoffs before benching your crappy QB. It's like Andy assumes this whole thing will only get worse if Mahomes is starting and there's no evidence to prove that would be the case.

ARROW2 11-28-2017 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Bob (Post 13245820)
He was semi mobile with a big arm. He wasn't "clutch" in college. Never led many comebacks or game winning drives. He came from a similar system that created space for receivers to be wide open. The fact that A&M's gimmick offense is well known and basically all the "experts" bring it up when talking about his college completion percentage. It's easy to see if you watch the film. Every play is a rub or pick. Also, Mahommes doesn't have an NFL completion percentage yet. Things aren't going to be the same as they were in college. Their backgrounds are very similar. Locker got the Fabre comparisons too. Again, Mahommes floor is Locker and his ceiling is Farve imo. Mahommes has potential and potential means he hasn't done anything yet. He can wow people with his arm but whether or not he can put a team on his back and carry them when they need it most is yet to be determined. That's why I wanted Watson. He did it in college and he's already done it in the pros. Mahommes has a lot to prove before I crown him.

Scared pussy. What THE **** is ALEX doing? What has he proven?

BlackHelicopters 11-28-2017 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 13245849)
It's pretty strange to want to wait until there's no chance of the playoffs before benching your crappy QB. It's like Andy assumes this whole thing will only get worse if Mahomes is starting and there's no evidence to prove that would be the case.
Actually, no evidence exists that a switch will result in either improvement or decline.

BleedingRed 11-28-2017 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 13245858)
Actually, no evidence exists that a switch will result in either improvement or decline.
Check the All-22 Thread

KCrockaholic 11-28-2017 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 13245858)
Actually, no evidence exists that a switch will result in either improvement or decline.
Exactly. So why not ****ing find out? As it stands it's a sinking ship and we won't know if the life vests will work unless we put them on.

BlackHelicopters 11-28-2017 12:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 13245862)
Exactly. So why not ****ing find out? As it stands it's a sinking ship and we won't know if the life vests will work unless we put them on.
I have no argument with your statement. You seem level headed and reasonable. Unlike others.......

Black Bob 11-28-2017 12:02 PM
Andy watches and talks to them every day of the week. Probably 360 days a year. I think he knows why if he does or doesn't make a change. We have no idea what's going on when it comes down to it.

BleedingRed 11-28-2017 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eDave (Post 13245870)
Alex's fate is in his own hands this week.
https://media.giphy.com/media/1M9fmo1WAFVK0/giphy.gif
http://media1.giphy.com/media/l0ExrM...MJCE/giphy.gif
http://i.imgur.com/8ukt9mT.gif


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.
Page 8 of 11 « First 4567 8 91011
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.