ChiefsPlanet
Page 8 of 22 « First 4567 8 910111218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Stafford or Sanchez? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200332)

Rigodan 01-14-2009 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 5391370)
I chose Sanchez. After watching a few games, I think Sanchez plays in a more NFL-like offense. I'm not opposed, however, to drafting Andre Smith, sucking for another year, then drafting a QB next year. Next years draft is going to be QB rich, whereas this draft might see 3 first round QB's total.
Who's gonna be there next year besides Bradford?

Mecca 01-14-2009 07:02 PM
Maybe when you know how the injury happened I'll respect your opinion of it because it didn't happen on a snap....

milkman 01-14-2009 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 5391390)
Riiiiiight, ok I'll give you the Croyle thing I didnt need to bring it up,

BUT

Mark Sanchez almost got taken out on a practice play snap where his KNEE buckled out on him. His coach even said "We got lucky"

Read the damn article you might learn a thing or two. I don't want a QB that has the propensity to break himself in practice. Those are the facts, deny them as you wish.
So, let me see if I understand this.

You don't want Sanchez cause he almost got injured, which makes him almost injury prone, right?

Rigodan 01-14-2009 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 5391390)
Riiiiiight, ok I'll give you the Croyle thing I didnt need to bring it up,

BUT

Mark Sanchez almost got taken out on a practice play snap where his KNEE buckled out on him. His coach even said "We got lucky"

Read the damn article you might learn a thing or two. I don't want a QB that has the propensity to break himself in practice. Those are the facts, deny them as you wish.
I don't think you pass up a franchise qb because something bad almost happened in practice one time.

OnTheWarpath15 01-14-2009 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigodan (Post 5391403)
I don't think you pass up a franchise qb because something bad almost happened in practice one time.
I heard he got a paper cut on his throwing hand in Biology class once.

Mecca 01-14-2009 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5391404)
I heard he got a paper cut on his throwing hand in Biology class once.
There was that time the drunk girl almost puked on him.

BigMeatballDave 01-14-2009 07:09 PM
I voted Stafford, but I'd be just as happy with Sanchez.

Rigodan 01-14-2009 07:10 PM
I heard the real reason Brady Quinn dropped was because he accidently zipped himself after going to the bathroom

Deberg_1990 01-14-2009 07:10 PM
I cant wait until we get the:

"Lets take Crabtree at #3" threads....

BigMeatballDave 01-14-2009 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 5391150)
sounds like Stafford is staying at OU.
see you next year when we are 4-12 or 5-11.
LMAO

BigMeatballDave 01-14-2009 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5391144)
it should, Elway was a much better quarterback imo

Elway could win a game with a minimal surrounding cast
Elway won a championship as soon as he got a decent running game

Trent Green was surrounded by talent and hung on for the ride
FYP

luv 01-14-2009 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5391368)
I think they both have huge upside.

I would like to see either drafted and groomed on the bench, Stafford because he needs to mature as a decision maker and Sanchez because he has much less time starting in college.

If I had to choose one that I felt could make the transition to starting in the NFL right away, that would be Sanchez because of his maturity and composure.
I was talking to my dad, and he said he was hoping we didn't get Stafford because he felt he wasn't a good decision maker. Just because someone can play under center doesn't automatically mean they're going to make it in the NFL. Look at the examples from this year. Ryan and Flacco have proven to be smart quarterbacks. Is that something that can be learned? He thinks that we're going to end up trading down and picking up a QB next year.

BigMeatballDave 01-14-2009 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 5391191)
well... Detroit needs a QB. So do the Rams Bulger isn't it long term. waiting for Chiefsplanet blow up when they are gone
and we trade down.
Unless Bulger agrees to a pay cut, they are not drafting a QB 2nd overall.

BigMeatballDave 01-14-2009 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391427)
I was talking to my dad, and he said he was hoping we didn't get Stafford because he felt he wasn't a good decision maker.
His numbers this season would beg to differ.

milkman 01-14-2009 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391427)
I was talking to my dad, and he said he was hoping we didn't get Stafford because he felt he wasn't a good decision maker. Just because someone can play under center doesn't automatically mean they're going to make it in the NFL. Look at the examples from this year. Ryan and Flacco have proven to be smart quarterbacks. Is that something that can be learned? He thinks that we're going to end up trading down and picking up a QB next year.
In Stafford's case, I think it is just a question of maturity.

He's got a strong arm, and like many young QBs with a strong, feels that he can make plays that aren't there.

Some kids grow out of that, and Stafford seems to have a good head on his shoulders, so I think he will learn.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 PM.
Page 8 of 22 « First 4567 8 910111218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.