When the opposing team's blatant, obvious, inexcusable cheating is a key factor in Denver being knocked out of the playoffs, and that team goes on to win the Super Bowl, check back with me.

Ok. Will do! :thumb: You do the same when it happens to KC.

I photoshopped that.... down to the red lines in the eyes... http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...6&postcount=15

Rivers is known for this taunting shit. He did it in the playoff game against the Colts last season... classless.

All this sucking up to our AFC west rivals by you guys is making me sick. Grow a pair. I don't care if our team sucks shit. The Chargers, Raiders, and Broncos all suck period.

Certainly not against the Chiefs and Dante Hall...

I'd be offended at your ridiculous assertion if I didn't know that it's all made out of jealousy from you.

What a load of a BS. It's easy to look the other way when it's your team that gets the benefit, but it wasn't too long ago when Dante Hall returned a punt against the Broncos for a TD and there were two blatant block in the backs that went uncalled and the Chiefs then barely won. It happens to all teams where bad calls hurt you and help you. Luckily for Denver they helped this week.

A block in the back is not as bad as what happened yesterday.

A crucial call at the end of the game, when the Ref was not 10 yards away, I cant get over this.

He was down by contact - the problem is, he hadn't actually caught the ball at that point. He didn't have control. The only time a player got control was when Baily finally secured the ball. There was not enough evidence on the tape to reverse that call.

Uh, ok....

How can you say that if they didn't even review it?

Guess what? You guys had a chance to shut us out of the endzone and walk away winners. But for the second week in a row, your defense choked and let a team into the endzone at game point. Cry all you want about how you shouldn't have been in that position. That's not going to change the fact that you guys gave up 18 catches to Brandon Marshall and then choked on the 2 point attempt allowing a rookie to navigate the endzone and put you away.

Just read the post you quoted again, thats my stance on the issue.

Anyone can say that. All they have to do is know the rules. He had one arm on the ground, and one arm trying to secure the football against his waist, with Champ Bailey vying for possession. Chambers had not secured the football and then made a football move. The ball was not caught until Bailey came up with it, which was essentially the ruling on the field. There was not enough evidence to overturn that call.

Read the scoreboard. That's my stance on the issue.

Give it up, BK. You're arguing guilt or innocence with O.J. Simpson.

Ok, Im done I guess.