![]() |
We gonna just rebuild a whole defense full of rookies.
|
Quote:
Im over aging CB's. They pretty much never work out well for us. I'm still having nightmares of Ty Law's slow ass.... |
I'll say it, I have no ****ing idea what the plan was this offseason. Seems like we were cap strapped and even when we got money trading away our most dynamic player... we are sitting on it.
Feel like its a reset. We have a lot of holes to fill. Losts of talent out the door - from the front office to the wideout room to the depleted CBs to nonexistent DL. |
Quote:
All these other teams are going all in to catch up to us. What no one is talking about....is that only one team gets to come out of the AFC every year. And this year is about to be a ****ing gauntlet for every team. But while they're taking on contracts because of rookie QB deals....they're going to eventually **** themselves and have their window closed once they have to pay said QB. |
Quote:
Most of these vets are on one or two year deals, though. Those won't hamstring the cap. I agree with drafting youth as a principle - speed - dynamic athletes - but that is putting a lot of pressure on a draft class to produce ASAP. We'll see, I hope they do amazing things with the flexibility. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But you can’t go all in every year or you’ll burn out. Smart teams do what we did and have a reload year. Patriots did this fairly frequently. It just looked different bc the AFC East and conference in general was nowhere near as talented then as it is now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope we get at least one decent year out of Gilmore. |
Quote:
By continually going "all in" we're not actually going "all in." Each roster surge of "all in" is progressively less and less potent than the others, while continually kicking the can down the road. A year or two in which the roster regroups doesn't mean we go 4-12. We're still a playoff team and I'd still argue we're the favorites to win the division. We might even go back to the Super Bowl during one of these "down" years, because we have Patrick ****ing Mahomes. If you're going to go all in, do it the right way. Do it with a mixture of young vibrant talent and key vet signings, and make strategic moves that actually push you over the top instead of just catch up to the moves your competitors make. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
CEH, Gay, Sneed, Bolton, Humphrey, and Bolton have all been big time contributors. I wouldn’t be shocked if we added 2-3 more immediate impact players in this draft with a few more that take a couple seasons to develop. Acting like draft picks need 3+ years to provide an impact just isn’t true. Especially, when you have QB set. |
Mahomes is for sure that QB that will play into his mid to late 30s....easy.
|
Bukkake on O.City!
|
Here’s some perspective, Mahomes is 8 years young than Wilson…
|
Quote:
I mean, we celebrated Mahomes contract structure because it meant we could go all in basically every year. What happened to that? |
Aaaaaand more crying from King Pussy about Tyreek Hill
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
CB is not really as much of a pressing need as some people are crying about. Veach has never acquired high priced/highly drafted CB’s and the Chiefs starting CB’s are set with Fenton/Sneed. They just need a nickel CB/depth which can be addressed in the middle rounds of the draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trading tyreek hill didn't "close the window." It blew the ****ing wall down, and now the team can be constructed in whatever fashion makes the most sense. There is no "window" anymore. there is omnidirectional possibility. they can STILL pay $30M a year for an all pro WR. That's not off the table. What is on the table now is having no positional weakness anywhere on the team. The cap will go up, KC's committed spend will go down, and meanwhile the other AFC (and specifically West) teams are loading up, cementing their windows. This team is set up tremendously for future success. Overpaying Hill would have absolutely locked this team into a 2 year window - at best. now, it's wide open. Never have a window, I say. Get out before those third contracts lock you in. |
I think I just typed "window" more than I have in three years.
|
Quote:
I mean....have you looked at the roster? |
Russ will be playing into his 50'$
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think the Chiefs want Bradberry but obviously don’t want to pay him what comes with that.
I think the Chiefs are waiting for him to be cut |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And all that's changed is that we've traded some star power for depth. This is not a rebuild. It doesn't look anything like a re-build. It's a philosophical shift where we've also helped get our books straight for the future. Quote:
We could've pushed the pain off another year, maybe two. But restructuring Mahomes was going to continue to pile on snow until the avalanche triggered. |
Quote:
I mean sure, great. There might be some post june 1st vets that are worth a shit... mebbe we get clowney or someone. I've just seen no indication that we are in that mode, we haven't been aggressive in the FA market, nor do I see the draft as a cure all. We have a lot of picks, yes... but how many impact rookies are in this class? 14? 15? I don't think Veach is playing 4D chess, I think they are going to take their lumps early one way or another. Mabbe we look back and say that the pain was worth it... maybe we say that was a wasted year or Pat's prime. |
Quote:
Btw, the biggest free agency move the chiefs have made is trade their 2nd best player. I think that and it's impact will be talked about a lot in terms of impact to the team and future moves. Might want to leave the free agency thread if you don't want to see it. |
There’s a chance we look back at those first four or so years as the golden years and it just never gets back to that level. That’s why ideally you stack another super bowl win on it.
It’s ****ing hard guys. They aren’t gonna have a “stacked roster with no holes”. That doesn’t happen in the nfl. Maybe they hit on these draft picks and take off. More likely than not a few hit, a few bust because that’s the way the league goes. I’m just not into this “take a year to retool” stuff. The league changes so much year too year, there’s no “do it the right way for the long haul”. It’s to quick and violent of a game, guys break down or don’t develop etc. The biggest thing now is the flexibility. They have that. In my opinion that’s bigger than the picks. Or atleast it adds to the picks. Once Mahomes signed the deal there was gonna come a time where he’s gonna have to do it with young draft picks or cheap vets. You want the big money, the star skill guys and a good defense? Sorry not possible. Well, here we are. No more vapor locks in the fourth quarter of the afc champ game that we excuse away for whatever reason. It’s exciting and scary |
Quote:
|
RIP Mahomes Era
|
Greed is the deed, you do to yourself
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bert needs to be savvy on how he allocates the rest of the money which I'm sure he will. |
I don’t know what Veach will do in this draft, but I have a strong feeling that all of our guesses will be way off. And whatever we do will make a lot of sense once it happens.
|
Williams is by far the best WR in this draft per Chris Sims. I believe it. Also...
I don't know what their grading system is but the Chiefs have lost a historical amount of talent on offense, per Football Outsiders. https://www.footballoutsiders.com/st...alent-turnover |
Go get him.
|
Feels like a throw away year then spend the big money we will have in 2023.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A trade for a Cooks or Lockett would help. If Juju is our #1 WR going into the season I will be very annoyed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
yeah, it's scary. But you know, we've got Andy Reid, who never has a shit offense. We've got Veach, who's improved each offseason. And we have Mahomes. I like our chances. And not just like...you know, in the future. I absolutely expect to contend in 2022. |
Quote:
And we aren't trading for Lockett. |
Quote:
We're not in nearly as bad a shape as some of you are making out. and trading for another veteran receiver that's wanting top dollar would be negating any value in trading Hill. I mean why do that if we're just going to pay Cooks or Lockett? it's gonna be okay, man. Let's just see what shakes out over the next month or so. but the offense is going to look different. Just get that in your head. It's going to be different. Doesn't mean it'll be worse. Reid never has shitty offenses. But it will be different. |
Quote:
And its so disingenuous to pretend that is not winning was because of a bad roster and not because of Mahomes playing like shit or because of Eric Fisher tearing his Achilles 1 game before the superbowl causing us to shuffle and **** up the line. We could have absolutely kept competing if we focused on the defense in FA and in the draft. Because all we needed on offense was a WRs and Juju and his bargain basement deal would have worked for us. |
Quote:
|
Annoyed about JuJU but wants to trade for the guy with a billion concussions.
|
Quote:
|
Go back and listen to what Brent Voigt said when he extended Patrick. He said then that he understood how it was gonna affect the cap, and he knew and had a plan for how to handle the contract of Patrick ( the greatest player this league has ever seen) Mahomes, and keeping the roster fresh to continue to be competing for championships. We have the best quarterback in the league, a top 2 coach in the league, a great young OL who’s mostly playing on rookie contracts, and a HOF TE, and that’s just the core. Andy has made a living off making playoffs and winning games with the likes of Kolb, Alex Smith, and McNabb. He has the best weapon at quarterback he’s ever had. This offense is gonna be very different this season, and all the tricks and schemes that worked well against our offense isn’t gonna work anymore. We’re gonna have teams on their heels coming out of the gate, cuz for the last 3 years they knew what to expect, and they drafted and signed players to stop this players and that offense. They’re not ready for what’s about to be unleashed, and it’s gonna be ****ing glorious!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It will put the bunny in the briar patch and some stink on those eggs
|
Way too many Veach and Reid apologists here. No doubt this team is in the most competitive era it has been in under this regime, but they are not without their warts. The Britt Reid fiasco cost them a second consecutive Super Bowl in my opinion, and that second half of the Bengals game was pure meltdown. The Frank Clark deal along with the Edwards-Helaire selection are not looking good years later and the voids on the defense currently with no veteran presence at certain levels of the defence are very concerning. The draft won’t solve all issues for this team and I am shocked Veach has not done more to at least insulate some positions with veteran additions. I hope there are no desperation moves ahead burning draft capital to get a big ticket name that robs the team of future cap management and the ability to replenish. One would feel better about such a move if the overall depth of the team was better, but there are so many needs right now.
|
Quote:
This fan base has become ridiculously entitled and unrealistic. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Blessed to see another year 🙏🏾🙏🏾 <a href="https://t.co/HNxW6FzSsB">pic.twitter.com/HNxW6FzSsB</a></p>— darrel williams (@darrelwilliams_) <a href="https://twitter.com/darrelwilliams_/status/1515157670340308993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course I’m pleased with the winning culture that has been established, but that does not mean organizational decisions and coaching cannot come under scrutiny. This current version of the Chiefs could arguably have appeared in the last four Superbowls but it only won one. The Hill trade is also a sign not everything is as peachy keen as fans would like to believe. Apparently Hill’s price tag was not prohibitive to KC but he left a winning culture and elite QB to go to Miami? It will be interesting to see the approach the remainder of the offseason. Questioning decisions and losses in clutch moments doesn't make me less of a fan. Blindly drinking the kool aid has never ended well for any fanbase either. |
Quote:
|
I actually don't have a problem with our free agency obviously other than a big problem with the Tyreek trade. I like the Reid signing and really liked signing Juju as a #2.
I'm hoping we trade for a DE or something because if not that means Frank Clark is going to be a starter again which is just flat out terrible. But I think we make a trade for a DE or CB because otherwise restructuring Thuney makes no sense and as good of a drafter as Veach is, finding a starting DE, CB, and WR in the same draft is an impossible task. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
When you lose like that a message needs to be sent to the team. No more Tyran, Tyreek, Robinson, Pringle, or Williams. That's a strong message. Hats off to Veach again. Now watch him go kill this draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But it does get silly when people can't accept any mistakes have been made. I mean, all GMs make mistakes. If someone is saying he flat out sucks, then fine, that's silly. If someone is saying "I don't think CEH was a good pick" or "Frank Clark's contract was a mistake" or "I'm not 100% convinced the Hill trade will work out" - it is odd how personally some people seem to take this, they're hardly indefensible positions to take. In terms of this FA it's obviously slower than last year's. A lot of people liked his decisiveness last year and now apparently think a slower/"build it through the draft" approach is right. I think that's actually reasonable, simply because this FA I've not seen a whole load of realistic options out there for us. There's no-one that's been brought in that I'm that excited about, but equally I could see all of them work out. But I also agree, at this point there's a lot of holes and we've definitely not used FA to fill ALL needs. Thank God we have a million draft picks. |
Knowmo knows his nitch
|
Quote:
The people who want to fire everybody because a draft pick didn't work out are not offering thoughtful criticism. The people who want to fire Andy Reid for any of his shortcomings are not offering thoughtful criticism because ALL coaches have shortcomings and there's literally not a better coach in football for Patrick Mahomes-so maybe people should cool their jets. This team, as it was constructed, was in a phase of diminishing returns. I was shocked we traded Hill. After looking at the numbers, and looking at the haul of picks, I get it, and I'm on board with the idea of a new phase. We're zigging while everyone else zags in an attempt to catch up to where we WERE. Only the people inside Arrowhead know what we will BE in September. It's going to look different. I'm excited. I have theories, as do you all I'm sure about what we're doing, but I can't wait to see it for myself. |
Quote:
But OK isn't the standard anymore. I want another championship. I'm not writing off the offense yet. But I am very nervous. As of now we are too easy to defend. I want one of Burks/Olave and a Shakir added in the draft if we don't trade for a vet. We can't afford another Mecole with our highest pick this year if we want to win the Superbowl. |
Quote:
The offense is too easy to defend? I would argue that. I would argue that it BECAME too easy to defend LAST season. Hill averaged what, like 11 ypc? That negates him, really. If I can do that as a defense playing KC, I'm real pleased with myself. Other than Hill's otherwordly ability to track a deep ball, Hardman can do many of the things Hill could do. All of the jet sweep stuff, WR screen stuff-Hardman can threaten a defense in the same way. We've added MVS, who is a big, fast deep threat that you have to account for. We've added Juju, a physical YAC machine who must be accounted for. And we still have Kelce. If we actually run the ball enough to be a threat there, this offense as it stands can threaten every blade of grass-and there's NO WAY Veach and Reid are done yet. I'm excited, but I'm unconcerned. It's entirely possible that this offense may be more EFFICIENT if less EXPLOSIVE. Although last season, it was often NEITHER for long stretches. And as I said, I fully expect at least one if not two WR's in the draft. Only MVS is on the roster for '23. That tells me that Veach is targeting guys in this draft. We have EIGHT picks in the first four rounds. EIGHT shots in the chamber to restock the talent on this team. I think this is going to be a LOT of fun. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.