ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Trade whatever possible for a LT prospect (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357091)

RunKC 02-15-2025 02:37 PM

Cam Robinson had a 72.2 pass blocking grade per PFF. Only 1 accepted penalty to that point. He was much better in our offense.

According to this he had a higher pass blocking grade in Minnesota.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Cam Robinson has a 77.6 PFF pass blocking grade since being acquired by the Vikings. He&#39;s been charged with one sack allowed in six games.<br><br>Kevin O’Connell on Robinson&#39;s impact: <br><br>&quot;I don’t know many teams that can lose one of the best left tackles in football and win six…</p>&mdash; Will Ragatz (@WillRagatz) <a href="https://twitter.com/WillRagatz/status/1867266702020313298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

For the life of me I don’t get why people wouldn’t want this kid. High floor, knows the offense, is not a chronic broke dick like some of these other options.

He would be the best pass blocking LT we’ve had since Eric Fisher.

TEX 02-15-2025 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palangi (Post 17969924)
Jackson would be no different in this offense

To be clear, what offense are you referring to? The Alex Smith looking one of this past season, or the more aggressive ones of seasons past?

pugsnotdrugs19 02-15-2025 02:41 PM

Count me in the camp of if we could sign a Robinson + Hollywood before the draft, that would free us up to go BPA completely worry free and probably add another 3-4 starters in the draft.

I’d sign off on it without second thought.

Hoover 02-15-2025 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17969939)
Conerly is the opposite of Kingsley. Kingsley has all the tangibles to be a great prospect. Conerly doesn't have the measurable but he has a ton of plus tape in a tough conference.

Conerly has a floor that Kingsley doesn't have. kingsley has a ceiling Conerly doesn't have.

And for that reason I think he makes a lot of sense. I don't think you can ignore the LT position in this draft. Yes, there is a glaring hole right now, but we need a RT next offseason. Who knows, maybe they both pan out, maybe Kingsley is a guard, maybe Morris is a RT, G, or maybe nothing.

I know there is a group of people who say it won't change the reality of the situation if you draft a 1st round LT, I also don't think the reality changes all that much with a FA LT. The Chiefs are going to still need to be looking for guys in the draft.

Palangi 02-15-2025 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 17969968)
To be clear, what offense are you referring to? The Alex Smith looking one of this past season, or the more aggressive ones of seasons past?

There one where you’re left on an island a lot as a tackle. That want the case in LA.

Sassy Squatch 02-15-2025 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17969965)
Cam Robinson had a 72.2 pass blocking grade per PFF. Only 1 accepted penalty to that point. He was much better in our offense.

According to this he had a higher pass blocking grade in Minnesota.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Cam Robinson has a 77.6 PFF pass blocking grade since being acquired by the Vikings. He&#39;s been charged with one sack allowed in six games.<br><br>Kevin O’Connell on Robinson&#39;s impact: <br><br>&quot;I don’t know many teams that can lose one of the best left tackles in football and win six…</p>&mdash; Will Ragatz (@WillRagatz) <a href="https://twitter.com/WillRagatz/status/1867266702020313298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

For the life of me I don’t get why people wouldn’t want this kid. High floor, knows the offense, is not a chronic broke dick like some of these other options.

He would be the best pass blocking LT we’ve had since Eric Fisher.

If he was anywhere near the caliber of player you seem to think he is the Jaguars wouldn't have traded him for literal peanuts while eating most of his salary to do so.

Sassy Squatch 02-15-2025 02:47 PM

It's not even the fact that they traded him with their only in house options being a JAG in Walker Little or a complete scrub in Anton Harrison. It's the fact that the 31 other teams had so little use for him that a conditional 5th and eating most of his salary is the best the Jaguars could do.

All I've read recently is OT play is next to impossible to find so teams should've been knocking down the Jaguars door with offers to trade for him. But they weren't. Because he isn't that good.

smithandrew051 02-15-2025 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17969970)
Count me in the camp of if we could sign a Robinson + Hollywood before the draft, that would free us up to go BPA completely worry free and probably add another 3-4 starters in the draft.

I’d sign off on it without second thought.

Yeah whoever it is (Robinson, Jackson, Humphries, etc). Have to have a solid vet option before the draft.

Chiefs can’t just hope the draft falls right for that position at that draft slot.

TEX 02-15-2025 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palangi (Post 17969972)
There one where you’re left on an island a lot as a tackle. That want the case in LA.

I think he'd be fine in the short passing Alex Smith offense. The problem with that whole deal is it limits Mahomes.

Easy 6 02-15-2025 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17969976)
It's not even the fact that they traded him with their only in house options being a JAG in Walker Little or a complete scrub in Anton Harrison. It's the fact that the 31 other teams had so little use for him that a conditional 5th and eating most of his salary is the best the Jaguars could do.

All I've read recently is OT play is next to impossible to find so teams should've been knocking down the Jaguars door with offers to trade for him. But they weren't. Because he isn't that good.

You're doing a great job of souring me on that dude

Sassy Squatch 02-15-2025 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 17969979)
You're doing a great job of souring me on that dude

Why? This has always been the score. Dude is a mediocre to below average LT. That's why he's even available. It may well be enough to get Mahomes back to elite status but we can call a spade a spade here.

Palangi 02-15-2025 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17969973)
If he was anywhere near the caliber of player you seem to think he is the Jaguars wouldn't have traded him for literal peanuts while eating most of his salary to do so.

If Alaric Jackson was everything you think he is the Rams would be tagging him or resigning him, or signed an extension during the season

But they don’t think much of him if they are willing to let him walk with no viable back up option on the roster. They would rather plug and play someone else.

Palangi 02-15-2025 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 17969978)
I think he'd be fine in the short passing Alex Smith offense. The problem with that whole deal is it limits Mahomes.

I agree

Sassy Squatch 02-15-2025 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palangi (Post 17969987)
If Alaric Jackson was everything you think he is the Rams would be tagging him or resigning him, or signed an extension during the season

Well, no, because they have an incredibly tight cap situation and 2 OTs already under contract that don't suck.

RunKC 02-15-2025 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 17969979)
You're doing a great job of souring me on that dude

People wanted to bring Donovan Smith back who nobody wanted this year. They want Alaric Jackson or Ronnie Stanley too.

If the Rams let a 26 year old LT walk willingly it says just as much as the Jaguars trading Robinson.

McVay isn’t stupid


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.