ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

|Zach| 09-23-2011 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 7934739)
Which is what Wickedson can't get his pointy little head around.

Nobody should be surprised. He is the University of Kansas version of the Iraqi Information Minister.

Saul Good 09-23-2011 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7934706)
Thanks. This list also helps my point.

Syracuse is a bball school. They were in demand by the ACC.

They aren't more profitable in football because the Big East has a shitty TV deal because they are a shitty basketball conference.

You call them a basketball school. Why do you think they want to leave the best basketball conference if basketball matters? Its because a shitty football program in a mediocre football conference still generates more profit than a good basketbball school in the premier basketball conference.

Bambi 09-23-2011 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7934731)
Exactly. This is the broader point.

The 'Cuse basketball team does make more money but they are making the move for more football money.

Totally fair point.

Frazod 09-23-2011 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7934742)
Championships > Profit

:)

I rather enjoyed Syracuse's last championship. :)

Reerun_KC 09-23-2011 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7934743)
Nobody should be surprised. He is the University of Kansas version of the Iraqi Information Minister.

okay that made me LMAO

Bambi 09-23-2011 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7934746)
They aren't more profitable in football because the Big East has a shitty TV deal because they are a shitty basketball conference.

You call them a basketball school. Why do you think they want to leave the best basketball conference if basketball matters? Its because a shitty football program in a mediocre football conference still generates more profit than a good basketbball school in the premier basketball conference.

Of course you want to be in a conference that has good balance.

All the conferences that are deemed desirable to be in have football and bball money rolling in.

Big East Football is not good. Pitt leaving makes it worse.

If the Big 12 had shitty football everyone would want to leave as well.

Bambi 09-23-2011 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7934750)
I rather enjoyed Syracuse's last championship. :)

:#

Reerun_KC 09-23-2011 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7934759)
:#

dont let that bother you...

that the closest hes ever been to a championship... Let them bask in the glory of another school... It helps them cope...

duncan_idaho 09-23-2011 09:21 AM

This thread seem to be developing a case of the AIDS as well. Let's see if I can pro-tease inhibitor it back to respectability...

Talked to a few people this morning. I'm convinced of a few things:

1) The national media outlets assuming Missouri is GOOD in the Big 12 are overlooking what I think is obvious to those of us who follow Mizzou closely: Last night was a warning shot fired over the bow of the rest of the Big 12. That looked like a very carefully scripted show, designed to set Missouri up to either bolt or make big demands of OU and Tex.

2) The phrase "Proud members of the Big 12" was purposely left out by Deaton. If you start hearing them use this phrasing, we'll know Missouri is staying put.

3) The SEC wants to get to 14, and it wants to do it with Missouri if the Tigers can extricate themselves from the mess that is the Big 12.

4) If UT and OU make the concessions Missouri wants, the Tigers might stay. Of course, UT didn't even make all the concessions OU wanted, so its doubtful they make them for 'lil ole Missouri.'

Frazod 09-23-2011 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7934759)
:#

You've been teeing that one up all morning. LMAO

|Zach| 09-23-2011 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7934764)
This thread seem to be developing a case of the AIDS as well. Let's see if I can pro-tease inhibitor it back to respectability...

Talked to a few people this morning. I'm convinced of a few things:

1) The national media outlets assuming Missouri is GOOD in the Big 12 are overlooking what I think is obvious to those of us who follow Mizzou closely: Last night was a warning shot fired over the bow of the rest of the Big 12. That looked like a very carefully scripted show, designed to set Missouri up to either bolt or make big demands of OU and Tex.

2) The phrase "Proud members of the Big 12" was purposely left out by Deaton. If you start hearing them use this phrasing, we'll know Missouri is staying put.

3) The SEC wants to get to 14, and it wants to do it with Missouri if the Tigers can extricate themselves from the mess that is the Big 12.

4) If UT and OU make the concessions Missouri wants, the Tigers might stay. Of course, UT didn't even make all the concessions OU wanted, so its doubtful they make them for 'lil ole Missouri.'

This is where I am at.

Reerun_KC 09-23-2011 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7934766)
You've been teeing that one up all morning. LMAO

speaking of that, I am heading to the course in exactly 1 hour and 40 min...

Bambi 09-23-2011 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7934699)
Which Football and Basketball Programs Produce the Largest Profits?

http://businessofcollegesports.com/2...rgest-profits/

It takes a while to get to the Kansas basketball program in terms of profit...

Go down the top 10...then move past Georgia Tech Football....past Pitt basketball...then keep going...past Northwestern football...and it is at #73.

Methinks that if your list here factored in what Kansas makes off it's $6 million a year IMG deal for basketball it may look a bit different.

just sayin

eazyb81 09-23-2011 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 7934764)

4) If UT and OU make the concessions Missouri wants, the Tigers might stay. Of course, UT didn't even make all the concessions OU wanted, so its doubtful they make them for 'lil ole Missouri.'

This is key.

What concessions would need to be made to make Missouri, as well as the rest of the Big 12, happy and content with this league's future?

To me, the linchpin in all of this is LHN, and I don't see any scenario where UT modifies it. More likely, I expect they will either bring OU into the fold, or pair with ESPN to help OU do something similar.

|Zach| 09-23-2011 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7934771)
Methinks that if your list here factored in what Kansas makes off it's $6 million a year IMG deal for basketball it may look a bit different.

just sayin

I will give you 6 million of pure profit. You still can't touch University of Colorado football. Who barely looks like they know how to play football.

LMAO

That and all the deals other schools get that will only credited to KU in your world.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.