![]() |
Quote:
They just got $20M of cap space and a handful of draft picks that will save further millions over the next 4-5 years. The ONLY reason to bemoan the trading of Hill is if you think the Chiefs will fail without him. If you think they'll be fine, what the **** is the problem? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In which case, his first 3 years are realistically all guaranteed at that point. I also wonder if that's going to be in addition to or in lieu of his 2022 figures. No matter - I am certain Veach did everything he could to get a deal together and the math just didn't work. I very much doubt we low-balled him or he 'took less money to play for Miami' or whatever other nonsensical platitudes we typically hear from guys who switch teams. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That’s your answer. |
I'm OK with this. Let's not freak out until free agency money is all spent and the draft goes down. This was not good news for Buffalo and New England, who now have to brush up on cover two deep...
And they did Hill a big favor trading him to where he really wanted to go. They didn't have to do that. He should have no hard feelings about being dealt. And he has $72 mill in guaranteed cabbage. |
Quote:
|
Prolly demanded a trade when Eric B was brought back
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Reality isn’t Madden. |
Quote:
The bidding for a tagged player STARTS at two 1st round picks. We barely got ONE. You're kidding yourself if you think this would have played out any differently next year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm just saying in general, I have really been feeling like we squandered a great opportunity over the last few years. Yes, that one Super Bowl win was fantastic, but another would have been ideal. I'd hate for us to look back in 10 years and that 2019 chip is the only one we added with Mahomes ala Rodgers, Brees, etc. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.