Keep reachin dude.

His main point is that Syracuse BB makes more than Syracuse FB for the school. Judging by the the link, he looks to be correct.

Reaching? You (falsely) claimed that Syracuse basketball EARNED $10 million more than Syracuse football. That is factually incorrect. in fact, Syracuse football EARNED more than Syracuse basketball.

Keep being wrong, dude.

Because them and Pitt are the teams that were deemed desirable to the ACC.

Syracuse is firmly a basketball school and relies on bball to run it's atletic department.

It goes completely against what many have been saying in this thread for about a year now.

That's who should be giving a ****.

omg

Top 25 most profitable football and basketball programs. 1 of them is a basketball program.

It is Louiseville. LMAO

Jesus christ. Earnings, revenue, profit - it's meaningless.

Football > Basketball

Syracuse, the "basketball school", leaves the best basketball conference in the country for the ACC. Why? Their football revenues will be MUCH higher from the ACC's TV contract than they received while in the Big East.

You keep bringing up why the ACC would want Syracuse. Their football viewership numbers are larger than many of the other possible additions to their conference.

The difference in football profit compared to basketball is a lot bigger than I thought.

I mean K-State football makes more money than Kansas basketball.

Exactly. This is the broader point.

The 'Cuse basketball team does make more money but they are making the move for more football money.

That list is amazing. I've wanted to see something just like that for years.

Wanted to copy and paste a lot of it but the formatting was a complete bitch. LMAO

Which is what Wickedson can't get his pointy little head around.

Championships > Profit

:)