![]() |
Quote:
|
What a shitfest of an article.
Yeah the Big XII will suddenly cease to exist and OU and UT won't give a shit anymore if Nebraska leave. People may not be clamoring to see what Mizzou does but no on is exactly on pins and needles to see what the hell Nebraska is going to do. They're both much more attractive as a package deal IMO. |
Quote:
|
pure speculation by ****ing blogger. sometimes I hate the internet. you know what's not journalism? The term "I bet."
|
Quote:
I like the Big 12 as it is. If a couple of rogue schools want to leave it, **** THEM. |
Quote:
|
2 points:
A) Missouri is the 18th most populous state in the Union and there's not a single state ahead of them that has only 1 major university. Better still, MU is smack in the middle of 2 major sports cities (and 2 NFL football teams). Does MU have a long history of sustained success? Nope, they don't. But there's nobody in the country that doesn't use the term 'underachiever' to describe MU thus far. For decades you've heard people wondering why MU hasn't become a more viable national player. From what I can tell, it's been a matter of the AD just not committing to being a sports power. That attitude has changed over the last decade or so and with Big 10 money, it could change even more. There's a LOT to like about MU going forward and I think that's what has attracted the Big 10. B) The Big 12 folks seem to think that MU gives a rip what the Big 12 thinks about their departure. We don't. If the Big 12 doesn't care that MU leaves, who gives a shit? MU is still upgrading. MU is still going to bring in a lot more money and go to a far more prestigous conference. Folks keep acting like MU is trying to leverage the Big 12 into a better deal - they're not. MU's gone as soon as they get an offer, period. What the Big 12 thinks about MU's leaving is completely irrelevant. Y'all sound like a jaded girlfriend. |
It's all about Nebraska. The only thing that Missouri has going for them is better academics, better athletics, and 10x the population base.
|
Quote:
The official moves have yet to be made, but the Pac-10 is remaining open minded in their approach to expansion. One option still being considered: A full merger between the Big 12 and Pac-10 that would blow yesterday's news away but still raise plenty of questions while making teams like Iowa State, Baylor and Kansas feel a little more secure. "There is an enormous amount of speculation about conference expansion right now and I think with the Pac-10 that anything is possible, all the way from remaining with the status quo, where we are today, to a full merger with the Big 12 and anything in between,'' Washington athletic director Scott Woodward told the Seattle Times on Thursday. "All possibilities are viable and open for discussion.'' A reminder: None of this would be anything the Big 12 brass are discussing -- or possibly even aware of -- this week in Kansas City, but the Pac-10 is making it clear they won't be happy with handing over the first move of conference realignment to the Big Ten. And after yesterday's talk -- or lack thereof -- it's hard to be surprised by anything in relation to the Big 12's future. http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...merger-in-play |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am not comparing the two universities as that is an exercise in futility. My point all along is that the Big XII isn't going to have a problem unless both teams leave. Why is that so damn hard to understand? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.