ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The Bills take the AFC this seasom (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=349860)

MahomesMagic 12-29-2024 06:43 PM

Bills in line for their 4th AFC Bronze medal in a row when they lose in the Divisional to Baltimore.

Hammock Parties 12-29-2024 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 17882916)
Bills in line for their 4th AFC Bronze medal in a row when they lose in the Divisional to Baltimore.

Imagine the salt when Josh doesn't get an MVP trophy for all the tush push TDs ROFL

MahomesMagic 12-29-2024 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17882945)
Imagine the salt when Josh doesn't get an MVP trophy for all the tush push TDs ROFL

It's great that Allen can play fullback in the NFL but they don't use their RB's in the red zone so he vultures all those TD's up.

Rainbarrel 12-29-2024 09:22 PM

Barkley is going to take the MVP from Joshie and his Lamarness

IowaHawkeyeChief 12-29-2024 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 17882916)
Bills in line for their 4th AFC Bronze medal in a row when they lose in the Divisional to Baltimore.

Yea, that run defense is absolute trash. The are going to get bum rushed by the Ravens.

Monticore 12-29-2024 09:26 PM

Still would be nice if Mahomes steaks the MVP, most game winning drives , best 3rd down And 4th quarter and best record. 5-6 guys will get votes

Rausch 12-30-2024 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monticore (Post 17883201)
Still would be nice if Mahomes steaks the MVP, most game winning drives , best 3rd down And 4th quarter and best record. 5-6 guys will get votes

Mahomes wins the only MVP that matters.

tredadda 12-30-2024 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 17883548)
Mahomes wins the only MVP that matters.

This all day. When looking at what really matters, regular season MVPs don’t even come close to SB MVPs.

Brady only had 3 MVPs in the regular season, but 5 SB MVPs.

Peyton, Rodgers, and Favre have a combined 12 MVPs. They combined have 3 SB MVPs and a total of 4 SB wins. I am pretty sure they would trade some of those regular season honors for more rings/SB MVPs.

Deberg_1990 12-30-2024 09:11 AM

Josh Allen might start this Sunday just to maintain his consecutive games starting streak. ��

Rainbarrel 12-30-2024 09:17 AM

If going out of their way to prop Allen up for MVP fails. Trade him and wipe that organization clean from GM down

RaidersOftheCellar 12-30-2024 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17883624)
This all day. When looking at what really matters, regular season MVPs don’t even come close to SB MVPs.

Brady only had 3 MVPs in the regular season, but 5 SB MVPs.

Peyton, Rodgers, and Favre have a combined 12 MVPs. They combined have 3 SB MVPs and a total of 4 SB wins. I am pretty sure they would trade some of those regular season honors for more rings/SB MVPs.

On a side note, the fact that Brady has 7 rings but only 5 SB MVPs is another reason I think the “Mahomes needs 7 rings to be the GOAT” argument is dumb. SB MVP practically goes to the QB by default unless the team won in spite of his play. If Mahomes gets to 5 SB MVPs, especially if it happens within the next few years, the argument should be over.

Hammock Parties 01-01-2025 12:29 PM

Are the Bills run by morons? They aren't going to have an easy wild-card opponent. Every premium player should be sitting.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Josh Allen on getting the start against the Patriots to extend his consecutive starts streak which sits at 114 (counting playoffs): “It’s something that means a lot to me. Just making sure that I’m available, playing through things throughout the years.. Glad I get to start.”… <a href="https://t.co/u0BZDmSGs2">pic.twitter.com/u0BZDmSGs2</a></p>&mdash; alex brasky (@alexbrasky) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexbrasky/status/1874523032749850937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ptlyon 01-01-2025 12:31 PM

Wants that mvp bad. Knows in the back of his mind how this is gonna play out

Chiefspants 01-01-2025 01:17 PM

When many of the 2007 Patriots blame playing the last regular season game on losing the Super Bowl, it only makes sense to continue playing your starters especially if you don’t have a bye coming up in the playoffs.

Deberg_1990 01-01-2025 01:19 PM

Allen will probably start and play a few series, just to keep that streak going. Ironman!

ptlyon 01-01-2025 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 17886227)
When many of the 2007 Patriots blame playing the last regular season game on losing the Super Bowl, it only makes sense to continue playing your starters especially if you don’t have a bye coming up in the playoffs.

The Patriots. Blaming anything other than themselves.

Color me shocked.

smithandrew051 01-01-2025 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 17886230)
Allen will probably start and play a few series, just to keep that streak going. Ironman!

He should play the whole game behind a back up OL!

A real leader would lead the backups into battle while giving the other starters a rest.

Bearcat 01-01-2025 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17886265)
He should play the whole game behind a back up OL!

A real leader would lead the backups into battle while giving the other starters a rest.

And if they don't let Allen play the entire game, go get Dan Campbell in the offseason so he has a HC with some balls!

DrunkBassGuitar 01-01-2025 01:45 PM

lol your path to the SB goes through the Ravens and the 2 week rested Chiefs. why would you not take every possible opportunity to rest starters. you need every advantage possible! you're going to play against a team that is extremely good at winning games at the margins, you can't cede the margins before the game even starts

smithandrew051 01-01-2025 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17886267)
And if they don't let Allen play the entire game, go get Dan Campbell in the offseason so he has a HC with some balls!

Dan Campbell would make Barkley set the rushing record.

He might even play for OT if Barkley comes up short in regulation.

DRM08 01-01-2025 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17886134)
Are the Bills run by morons? They aren't going to have an easy wild-card opponent. Every premium player should be sitting.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Josh Allen on getting the start against the Patriots to extend his consecutive starts streak which sits at 114 (counting playoffs): “It’s something that means a lot to me. Just making sure that I’m available, playing through things throughout the years.. Glad I get to start.”… <a href="https://t.co/u0BZDmSGs2">pic.twitter.com/u0BZDmSGs2</a></p>&mdash; alex brasky (@alexbrasky) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexbrasky/status/1874523032749850937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 1, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He might just be handing the ball off to RB for a couple drives. Leave the game pretty early in first half.

Pepe Silvia 01-01-2025 02:47 PM

Josh Allen is a pure stats QB.

ptlyon 01-01-2025 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17886268)
lol your path to the SB goes through the Ravens and the 2 week rested Chiefs. why would you not take every possible opportunity to rest starters. you need every advantage possible! you're going to play against a team that is extremely good at winning games at the margins, you can't cede the margins before the game even starts

Or, pad stats until the inevitable end

duncan_idaho 01-01-2025 03:20 PM

I mean, if you play Allen and are padding his stats as you do it, aren’t you risking the football gods making you pay?

Why expose your QB to injury in a game that doesn’t matter?

I can see letting him have a series to keep his silly streak alive, but it would be pretty silly to do something like the tush push or QB power while they do it.

Hammock Parties 01-01-2025 03:24 PM

Dude could blow a ligament in his leg while rolling out after a handoff FFS.

PHOG 01-01-2025 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17886431)
Dude could blow a ligament in his leg while rolling out after a handoff FFS.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2...yQ1DU/200.webp

smithandrew051 01-01-2025 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17886416)
I mean, if you play Allen and are padding his stats as you do it, aren’t you risking the football gods making you pay?

Why expose your QB to injury in a game that doesn’t matter?

I can see letting him have a series to keep his silly streak alive, but it would be pretty silly to do something like the tush push or QB power while they do it.

If Allen got hurt playing in a meaningless game, McDermott is fired, right?

FlaChief58 01-01-2025 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17886448)
If Allen got hurt playing in a meaningless game, McDermott is fired, right?

Do not pass go

<iframe src="https://gifer.com/embed/1oUo" width=480 height=480.000 frameBorder="0" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://gifer.com">via GIFER</a></p>

Rainbarrel 01-01-2025 04:30 PM

Wouldn't a game started with no stats drop his average. New excuse for fans

RaidersOftheCellar 01-01-2025 04:32 PM

Didn't they confirm that he's only going to take a snap or two before he's pulled?

RaidersOftheCellar 01-01-2025 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainbarrel (Post 17886766)
Wouldn't a game started with no stats drop his average. New excuse for fans

"We were going to give you MVP, but your yards per game are just slightly too low to justify it. Better luck next year."

Tribal Warfare 01-01-2025 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17886268)
lol your path to the SB goes through the Ravens and the 2 week rested Chiefs. why would you not take every possible opportunity to rest starters. you need every advantage possible! you're going to play against a team that is extremely good at winning games at the margins, you can't cede the margins before the game even starts

Mother****er thinks he's Brett Favre with an imaginary Mark Brunnell breathing down his neck attempting to take his job

RaidersOftheCellar 01-01-2025 04:41 PM

"We were going to give you MVP, but Trubisky was more impressive vs the Patriots than you were."

Basileus777 01-01-2025 05:33 PM

Allen has been padding stats all year, his MVP case relies on him vulturing a bunch of 1 yard runs from his RB. I still doubt he plays much in this game.

Deberg_1990 01-01-2025 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 17886888)
Allen has been padding stats all year, his MVP case relies on him vulturing a bunch of 1 yard runs from his RB. I still doubt he plays much in this game.

I mean. He is pretty automatic on short yardage
Why wouldn’t you do it if he has a higher rate of success than any RB you have?

But watch them leave him in there for a drive or two to get a cheap TD or two.

Basileus777 01-01-2025 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 17886898)
I mean. He is pretty automatic on short yardage
Why wouldn’t you do it if he has a higher rate of success than any RB you have?

But watch them leave him in there for a drive or two to get a cheap TD or two.

Cook is 2/2 from the goalline, he just doesn't get the attempts. And the Bills have the best oline in the league. But the point is that those TDs aren't that valuable because it's an 80%+ success rate play for anyone. They should not be the hinge of a MVP case.

Rainbarrel 01-01-2025 06:50 PM

You see that head in a popcorn bucket setting on a guy's lap and saying Buffalo. What is the message here

Wallcrawler 01-02-2025 09:18 AM

The level of surprise at the Buffalo Bills doing stupid things is much higher than anticipated. It is very unlikely that the Bills win anything under McDerpitt.

Let's be honest here.

Josh Allen knows that his precious consecutive games started streak is the only thing he's getting out of this seasoM.

Allen is probably praying the hardest that The Bengals don't reach the playoffs, because if they do, Allen knows there's a really good chance he's losing a playoff game in his own stadium for the third year in a row.

So sure. Play. Keep your consecutive games started streak going, and see if it's enough to counter the post seasoM home loss streak you'll have going.

Allen has 3 wins against teams with a winning record. They won a shootout with the Lions, 48-42 Spags giftwrapped the Chiefs 30-21 loss with probably the easiest 30+ yard td run late in the game on 4th down of Allen's entire God damn career to put the game out of reach, and a 31-10 drubbing of the Seahawks.

The trash that Allen has been feasting on is not what is going to be rolling into Buffalo. Bills are 3-3 against winning clubs.

DrunkBassGuitar 01-02-2025 09:19 AM

when did the coward mods fix the typo in the thread title, bring it back it was a very bills fan typo!

Hammock Parties 01-02-2025 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17887279)
when did the coward mods fix the typo in the thread title, bring it back it was a very bills fan typo!

bad juju

tredadda 01-02-2025 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 17886888)
Allen has been padding stats all year, his MVP case relies on him vulturing a bunch of 1 yard runs from his RB. I still doubt he plays much in this game.

Look at Lamar’s first MVP season. They were padding his stats all year.

tredadda 01-02-2025 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 17887278)
The level of surprise at the Buffalo Bills doing stupid things is much higher than anticipated. It is very unlikely that the Bills win anything under McDerpitt.

Let's be honest here.

Josh Allen knows that his precious consecutive games started streak is the only thing he's getting out of this seasoM.

Allen is probably praying the hardest that The Bengals don't reach the playoffs, because if they do, Allen knows there's a really good chance he's losing a playoff game in his own stadium for the third year in a row.

So sure. Play. Keep your consecutive games started streak going, and see if it's enough to counter the post seasoM home loss streak you'll have going.

Allen has 3 wins against teams with a winning record. They won a shootout with the Lions, 48-42 Spags giftwrapped the Chiefs 30-21 loss with probably the easiest 30+ yard td run late in the game on 4th down of Allen's entire God damn career to put the game out of reach, and a 31-10 drubbing of the Seahawks.

The trash that Allen has been feasting on is not what is going to be rolling into Buffalo. Bills are 3-3 against winning clubs.

ROFL Love how you kept the seasoM going.

Bearcat 01-02-2025 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17887279)
when did the coward mods fix the typo in the thread title, bring it back it was a very bills fan typo!

I just noticed that the other day, too.

mr. tegu 01-02-2025 11:03 AM

The typo needs to be fixed back to the typo.

FloridaMan88 01-02-2025 11:09 AM

We really trying to mess with success here?

S E A S O M

Passepartout 01-02-2025 02:50 PM

Wouldn't be surprising if the Chiefs host the Bills for the AFC Championship Game!

TomBarndtsTwin 01-02-2025 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Passepartout (Post 17887684)
Wouldn't be surprising if the Chiefs host the Bills for the AFC Championship Game!

Hard to imagine that NOT happening if the current playoff seeds play out like they should.

Buffalo and Baltimore likely win their WC games and are set up to play each other in the divisional.

Chiefs get to play the tomato can that emerges from Pitt. vs. Houston.

Pretty easy path to the Title Game for KC.

Just a matter of will we be playing Buffalo or Baltimore?

Bl00dyBizkitz 01-02-2025 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88 (Post 17887392)
We really trying to mess with success here?

S E A S O M

Seasom is part of the culture. It's part of our history. We can't just retcon Seasom, what kind of savages are we?

duncan_idaho 01-02-2025 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 17887697)
Hard to imagine that NOT happening if the current playoff seeds play out like they should.

Buffalo and Baltimore likely win their WC games and are set up to play each other in the divisional.

Chiefs get to play the tomato can that emerges from Pitt. vs. Houston.

Pretty easy path to the Title Game for KC.

Just a matter of will we be playing Buffalo or Baltimore?


It’s pretty easy to imagine the Bills getting upset at home by Baltimore, for me…

In fact, I will consider it an upset if Buffalo wins that game.

Hammock Parties 01-02-2025 05:18 PM

mods ****ing sleeping on the job

smithandrew051 01-02-2025 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17887279)
when did the coward mods fix the typo in the thread title, bring it back it was a very bills fan typo!

A typo in the title of a bad thread is always funny:

https://www.chiefsplanet.com/bb/showthread.php?t=325902

St. Patty's Fire 01-02-2025 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 17887279)
when did the coward mods fix the typo in the thread title, bring it back it was a very bills fan typo!

its been wrong for like 2 ****ing years why change it now??? clown behavior

mr. tegu 01-02-2025 07:47 PM

Going to have to place a bet on the Bills winning it all. This is obviously a bad change to put out in the universe.

rfaulk34 01-02-2025 09:25 PM

WHY ISN'T DAFACE FIXING HIS SHIT??!!!!

Rainbarrel 01-02-2025 10:08 PM

It's like Hope Solo without organic mayo

Rausch 01-03-2025 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17887803)
It’s pretty easy to imagine the Bills getting upset at home by Baltimore, for me…

In fact, I will consider it an upset if Buffalo wins that game.

I wouldn't be shocked in the least if the hapless Chargers beat Baltimore in round 1. The Ravens and Bills are shockingly inferior to what they were last year...

St. Patty's Fire 01-03-2025 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 17888132)
I wouldn't be shocked in the least if the hapless Chargers beat Baltimore in round 1. The Ravens and Bills are shockingly inferior to what they were last year...

im rooting for the steelers to win so we have a better chance at avoiding the Chargers. They’re the scariest AFC wc and its not even close. i still think we’d beat em but it’d be a massive butt clench. If Chargers/Ravens is confirmed I’d absolutely be on Ravens upset watch, but i’d be rooting for Baltimore so we get houston or pittsburgh.

duncan_idaho 01-03-2025 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 17888132)
I wouldn't be shocked in the least if the hapless Chargers beat Baltimore in round 1. The Ravens and Bills are shockingly inferior to what they were last year...


I wouldn’t be shocked, but I’d be surprised. I still don’t think the Chargers run D is all that great, and the Ravens have no problem spamming the same stuff. Henley and James give them some good spy/matchup options against Jackson, Andrews, and Likely, though.

I don’t think the Chargers have the weapons to take advantage of Baltimore’s susceptible pass D.

pugsnotdrugs19 01-03-2025 09:05 AM

Hopefully Pitt can extinguish Cincy Saturday night and lock themselves into going to Houston.

That would then make it probably an 80% or better chance that we draw Steelers or Texans in the divisional and I feel great about those matchups even on a 'B' day.

King_Chief_Fan 01-03-2025 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by St. Patty's Fire (Post 17888166)
im rooting for the steelers to win so we have a better chance at avoiding the Chargers. They’re the scariest AFC wc and its not even close. i still think we’d beat em but it’d be a massive butt clench. If Chargers/Ravens is confirmed I’d absolutely be on Ravens upset watch, but i’d be rooting for Baltimore so we get houston or pittsburgh.

So...the #1 seed Chiefs shouldn't care who they play nor should we. Bring them on.

ptlyon 01-03-2025 09:23 AM

This is where the cheese gets binding. Let's see who blinks first.

Go Royals 01-03-2025 09:26 AM

why does it still say season?????

htismaqe 01-03-2025 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 17888191)
So...the #1 seed Chiefs shouldn't care who they play nor should we. Bring them on.

No shit. The Chiefs beat the Chargers twice. They're not scary at all.

DJ's left nut 01-03-2025 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17888177)
I wouldn’t be shocked, but I’d be surprised. I still don’t think the Chargers run D is all that great, and the Ravens have no problem spamming the same stuff. Henley and James give them some good spy/matchup options against Jackson, Andrews, and Likely, though.

I don’t think the Chargers have the weapons to take advantage of Baltimore’s susceptible pass D.

Yeah, the AFC looks set to go completely chalk to me. The only home team that might lose would be Houston because those guys are just in a tailspin right now.

I guess they'd be playing Pittsburgh? Neither of those teams seems inclined to win a post-season game but if they face each other, one of 'em is gonna have to before getting steamrolled by KC.

Neither team has even an A game that can beat KC's B game.

tk13 01-03-2025 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17888293)
Yeah, the AFC looks set to go completely chalk to me. The only home team that might lose would be Houston because those guys are just in a tailspin right now.

I guess they'd be playing Pittsburgh? Neither of those teams seems inclined to win a post-season game but if they face each other, one of 'em is gonna have to before getting steamrolled by KC.

Neither team has even an A game that can beat KC's B game.

I would not put money on the Chargers and Broncos but they're both teams with veteran coaches and top 5 defenses. They can at least get you in a rock fight. But if the game gets away from them they might get blown out.

I get that Burrow is putting up monster numbers but I'm not entirely convinced the Bengals are THAT much more dangerous than the Broncos/Chargers like all the talking heads are saying. With the Bengals you have to win a shootout so you aren't going to blow them out, I get that. Teams with bottom 5 defenses usually trip up somewhere though because the offense has to be perfect.

Lzen 01-03-2025 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by St. Patty's Fire (Post 17887837)
its been wrong for like 2 ****ing years why change it now??? clown behavior

Does anyone think that maybe the title was changed by the thread starter?

htismaqe 01-03-2025 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 17888340)
Does anyone think that maybe the title was changed by the thread starter?

He hasn't been logged in since September.

ptlyon 01-03-2025 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 17888340)
Does anyone think that maybe the title was changed by the thread starter?

Well, **** HIM

Lzen 01-03-2025 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17888343)
He hasn't been logged in since September.

Do we know when the title was changed?

DJ's left nut 01-03-2025 11:02 AM

You'll just have a hard time convincing me that a team that lost 4 of 5 games -- TWICE -- is 'the most dangerous team in the playoffs'

They had two completely independent stretches where they went 1-4. And the only thing that prevented those from being 5 game losing streaks was beating the Panthers and Raiders respectively.

No, they're not a good football team. They're not even the sort of dynamic offense that keeps you from being dependent on game-script because they haven't demonstrated the ability to come back in games.

They're no different than the Baltimore teams of a couple years back that had one way to win -- keep you from scoring, get the lead, let Lamar and the run game salt the game away.

The Bengals have one way to win -- take the lead, keep scoring, hold onto the lead like grim death as their defense craters around them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Broncos win STILL their only win against a .500 team this year?

I've never seen a team get so much credit on the strength of one half of good football 4 years ago. It's just the strangest thing.

Bearcat 01-03-2025 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17888353)
You'll just have a hard time convincing me that a team that lost 4 of 5 games -- TWICE -- is 'the most dangerous team in the playoffs'

They had two completely independent stretches where they went 1-4. And the only thing that prevented those from being 5 game losing streaks was beating the Panthers and Raiders respectively.

No, they're not a good football team. They're not even the sort of dynamic offense that keeps you from being dependent on game-script because they haven't demonstrated the ability to come back in games.

They're no different than the Baltimore teams of a couple years back that had one way to win -- keep you from scoring, get the lead, let Lamar and the run game salt the game away.

The Bengals have one way to win -- take the lead, keep scoring, hold onto the lead like grim death as their defense craters around them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Broncos win STILL their only win against a .500 team this year?

I've never seen a team get so much credit on the strength of one half of good football 4 years ago. It's just the strangest thing.

Panthers, 4-12
Giants, 3-13
Browns twice, 3-13
Raiders, 4-12
Titans, 3-13
Cowboys, 7-9 (against Cooper Rush)
Broncos, 9-7 (in OT)

That's why I don't like the Burrow MVP talk... yeah, he almost beat some good teams, so we're saying he elevated his team to almost winning a few games and uh, not losing to 3-win teams? :shrug:

I think they'd be a significantly tougher out than the imploding Texans or complete fraud Steelers, but that's not saying a ton given what they haven't accomplished all season.

rfaulk34 01-03-2025 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17888353)
You'll just have a hard time convincing me that a team that lost 4 of 5 games -- TWICE -- is 'the most dangerous team in the playoffs'

They had two completely independent stretches where they went 1-4. And the only thing that prevented those from being 5 game losing streaks was beating the Panthers and Raiders respectively.

No, they're not a good football team. They're not even the sort of dynamic offense that keeps you from being dependent on game-script because they haven't demonstrated the ability to come back in games.

They're no different than the Baltimore teams of a couple years back that had one way to win -- keep you from scoring, get the lead, let Lamar and the run game salt the game away.

The Bengals have one way to win -- take the lead, keep scoring, hold onto the lead like grim death as their defense craters around them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Broncos win STILL their only win against a .500 team this year?

I've never seen a team get so much credit on the strength of one half of good football 4 years ago. It's just the strangest thing.

Not even close....bud! /John Bender, probably.

KC - lost the lead on a Morris TD half way through the 3rd. Regained the lead on a Yoshi TD late 3rd. Lost the lead on a fumblesix, start of the 4th. Regained the lead on a McP FG just about half way through the 4th.

WSH - Scored 3 TDs to draw close each time in the 2nd half. Defense could not make a single stop the entire game.

BLT(2) - Chase TD to tie the game w/5mins left in the 4th. Los the lead on a TD w/under 2 mins left in the 4th. Chase TD w/38 seconds in the 4th. failed 2 pt try to lose.

LAC - 3 TDs in the 2nd half to tie the game with 12 minutes left in the 4th.

DAL - FG to tie w/10 min left in the 4th. TD to take lead with 1 minute left in the 4th.

DEN - GWD in OT.
Obv, only 2 of those are wins but they don't just have one way to win. The defense has actually improved a little in important points of the game recently.

As far as your last point. It's not strange at all since it was more than 1 good half of football. It was finding a way to win 3 straight times, once to go to the SB and making Patty look human while doing it.

You've managed to beat Burrow twice in a row since then, by a combined 4 pts, so we'll see how it turns out the next time we meet...

rfaulk34 01-03-2025 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17888371)
Panthers, 4-12
Giants, 3-13
Browns twice, 3-13
Raiders, 4-12
Titans, 3-13
Cowboys, 7-9 (against Cooper Rush)
Broncos, 9-7 (in OT)

That's why I don't like the Burrow MVP talk... yeah, he almost beat some good teams, so we're saying he elevated his team to almost winning a few games and uh, not losing to 3-win teams? :shrug:

I think they'd be a significantly tougher out than the imploding Texans or complete fraud Steelers, but that's not saying a ton given what they haven't accomplished all season.

My goodness...i'd almost be willing to give my right ****ing leg to get in, drop Buff and meet the Chiefs in arrowhead again this year...

htismaqe 01-03-2025 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17888385)
Not even close....bud! /John Bender, probably.

KC - lost the lead on a Morris TD half way through the 3rd. Regained the lead on a Yoshi TD late 3rd. Lost the lead on a fumblesix, start of the 4th. Regained the lead on a McP FG just about half way through the 4th.

WSH - Scored 3 TDs to draw close each time in the 2nd half. Defense could not make a single stop the entire game.

BLT(2) - Chase TD to tie the game w/5mins left in the 4th. Los the lead on a TD w/under 2 mins left in the 4th. Chase TD w/38 seconds in the 4th. failed 2 pt try to lose.

LAC - 3 TDs in the 2nd half to tie the game with 12 minutes left in the 4th.

DAL - FG to tie w/10 min left in the 4th. TD to take lead with 1 minute left in the 4th.

DEN - GWD in OT.
Obv, only 2 of those are wins but they don't just have one way to win. The defense has actually improved a little in important points of the game recently.

As far as your last point. It's not strange at all since it was more than 1 good half of football. It was finding a way to win 3 straight times, once to go to the SB and making Patty look human while doing it.

You've managed to beat Burrow twice in a row since then, by a combined 4 pts, so we'll see how it turns out the next time we meet...

Gonna be a while considering the Bengals aren't making the playoffs.

rfaulk34 01-03-2025 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 17888347)
Do we know when the title was changed?

I feel like i got a good solid look at seasom just 2 or 3 days ago. But i can't say for certain.

rfaulk34 01-03-2025 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17888391)
Gonna be a while considering the Bengals aren't making the playoffs.

Yeah, we'll see about that.

jjjayb 01-03-2025 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17888385)
Not even close....bud! /John Bender, probably.

KC - lost the lead on a Morris TD half way through the 3rd. Regained the lead on a Yoshi TD late 3rd. Lost the lead on a fumblesix, start of the 4th. Regained the lead on a McP FG just about half way through the 4th.

WSH - Scored 3 TDs to draw close each time in the 2nd half. Defense could not make a single stop the entire game.

BLT(2) - Chase TD to tie the game w/5mins left in the 4th. Los the lead on a TD w/under 2 mins left in the 4th. Chase TD w/38 seconds in the 4th. failed 2 pt try to lose.

LAC - 3 TDs in the 2nd half to tie the game with 12 minutes left in the 4th.

DAL - FG to tie w/10 min left in the 4th. TD to take lead with 1 minute left in the 4th.

DEN - GWD in OT.
Obv, only 2 of those are wins but they don't just have one way to win. The defense has actually improved a little in important points of the game recently.

As far as your last point. It's not strange at all since it was more than 1 good half of football. It was finding a way to win 3 straight times, once to go to the SB and making Patty look human while doing it.

You've managed to beat Burrow twice in a row since then, by a combined 4 pts, so we'll see how it turns out the next time we meet...

So next year? On your way to another year of watching the playoffs from the couch. Sounds about right. Bengals are going to fade back into obscurity and so will you

Buehler445 01-03-2025 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17888293)
Yeah, the AFC looks set to go completely chalk to me. The only home team that might lose would be Houston because those guys are just in a tailspin right now.

I guess they'd be playing Pittsburgh? Neither of those teams seems inclined to win a post-season game but if they face each other, one of 'em is gonna have to before getting steamrolled by KC.

Neither team has even an A game that can beat KC's B game.

Houston looked really REALLY ****ing bad the week after they played us. Tank Dell might have imploded that team. Maybe it's because they clinched and they got deflated after taking a shot at the champ. But they looked really awful.

htismaqe 01-03-2025 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17888394)
Yeah, we'll see about that.

The Chiefs are going to lose. Haven't you heard? They're so scared of facing the Bengals they're letting the Broncos win on purpose.

rfaulk34 01-03-2025 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17888398)
The Chiefs are going to lose. Haven't you heard? They're so scared of facing the Bengals they're letting the Broncos win in purpose.

I DON'T BELIEF THAT!!!!!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.