saphojunkie |
11-04-2016 02:21 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo
(Post 12528685)
Nick Foles can't throw the ball any further than Alex Smith.
And Nick Foles isn't going to bust wide open Reid's offensive system.
If you think he is, you are absolutely delusional.
Reid's system is based on accuracy. Timing on routes. A strict route tree/patterns. Turnover margin. Time of possession.
And it wins football games.
Go ask a Cowboys fan.
Tony Romo versus Dak Prescott.
Ask Jet fans after the KC game how much they love a "gunslinger" type QB.
Foles is not a better QB than Smith and he's not going to be hurling the ball over the field. He's not going to go outside the system and freelance his way all over the field. The system works, and the system wins games.
I was thrilled when they signed Foles for exactly this situation. He's knows the system and is good enough to help keep this team in a couple of games if Smith were to go down with injury.
To keep Smith out of the Jags game and have Foles start is smart. But for the long term interest of the team's playoff success, Smith is, without question, the best option. By a very wide margin.
Alex Smith is a very good NFL QB. Especially for Reid's system. His win/loss record, accuracy %, TD/Int ratio, etc. during his time in KC proves it.
Frankly I'm absolutely stunned that he's been nearly vilified by a certain segment of Chiefs "fans" for being the near perfect QB for Reid's system that has led to winning records every year he's been here including two playoff appearances and a playoff win. The KC Chiefs fans "basket of deplorables" if you will.
|
Nick Foles threw 27 touchdowns in 10 starts.
Alex Smith has never thrown more than 23 in an entire season.
That is the damning piece of evidence. I think I'm fairly well on-record having defended Smith against the army of idiots that pretend like somehow he's terrible for the team, or not capable of winning big games.
However, Foles absolutely has a different skill set - one that has been demonstrably more productive than Alex Smith's. They are wildly different players, so it's ridiculous to say that Smith is..."the best option. By a very wide margin."
That's ****ing ridiculous. You can prefer Smith's skill set, but it is absolutely not the better option by any evidence presented so far.
And if Foles is incapable of taking advantage of the deep pass in this system, then why did he have 5 passes of more than 28 yards while Smith only had ONE pass of more than 23?
Are you saying that Reid changed the play calling to fit Nick Roles? If so, then... ****ing right on.
If he DIDN'T change the play calling to fit Foles' skill set, then Foles' skill set allowed him to take better advantage of the play calling. either way, Foles vs. Smith is in NO WAY an open/shut case and the debate is only starting.
|