ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2018 Free Agents (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=313128)

RunKC 03-27-2018 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 13491603)
WTF?

We have better weapons. They have more depth than we do.

Kelce, Hunt, Watkins, Hill, Conley...Ware? Chesson?

Howard, Cohen, Gabriel, Burton, Shaheen, Robinson........and then get back Kevin White and Cameron Meredith as insurance.

TRR 03-27-2018 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491612)
The Bears definitely have more weapons than they did last year, but that is certainly a stretch

With their prized FA weapon coming off an ACL injury, and Kevin White always injured.

Not a fan of the Bears “weapons”.

TRR 03-27-2018 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491560)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Giants’ HC Pat Shurmur on Odell Beckham Jr.: “He’s on our team right now.”</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/978612777186099202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Yeah, we should have done this instead of Watkins.

OMG...absolutely no.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 09:58 AM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...206863339.html

Five positions the Chiefs could upgrade before the 2018 season

Quote:

1. Defensive line
The Chiefs re-signed Jarvis Jenkins and tendered Rakeem Nunez-Roches. They also signed Grandview High product Xavier Williams to bolster the run defense as their best interior run stopper, Bennie Logan, left via free agency. Throw those guys in the mix with established starters Chris Jones and Allen Bailey, and you can live with this group. But Veach is trying to build a dominant unit up front, and with Bailey, Williams and Nunez-Roches all slated to hit free agency after this season, it would be a major surprise if the Chiefs didn't invest a premium draft pick in a potential three-down talent.

2. Defensive back
The trade of Peters leaves a void that Fuller will likely fill, while the super-competitive Nelson will be motivated to have a career season in a contract year. Add those two to David Amerson, who shined in 2015 with Oakland but will be looking to cash in after playing this season on a one-year prove-it deal, and the Chiefs' top three corners will be competitive. The depth behind them is lacking, however, and someone will need to step up and surprise. Bet on help coming via a top-100 pick, especially in a league that covets cover corners like never before. The best-case scenario? A top-40 talent falls to the Chiefs' first pick, No. 54 overall. But if a good corner (or defensive lineman) falls to the end of the first round, it wouldn't be a surprise to see Veach — who trusts his scouting eye and is unfailingly aggressive — move up and snatch one. At safety, a rangy cover man with ball skills could tempt the Chiefs: they interviewed several at the annual scouting combine.

3. Edge rusher
The Chiefs have the makings of a really good edge rush, provided everything breaks right. Justin Houston is expensive throughout his career, but he remains elite. And the smart money is on Dee Ford turning his insane first-step quickness into a double-digit sack season and contract-year payday in 2018. Meanwhile, the coaching staff loves 2017 second-round pick Tanoh Kpassagnon's ridiculous combination of size (6 foot 7) and athleticism, which is matched by a happy-go-lucky spirit and desire to get better. But if Houston and Ford get nicked up and Kpassagnon still hasn't mastered the mental side of the game (or the intricacies of holding the edge), the Chiefs could be in trouble here. If they plan to move on from Ford or Houston after this season, it would make sense to invest a top-100 pick in a talented edge rusher to add competition to the group.

4. Offensive line
Don't sleep on the loss of Zach Fulton; the free-agent center's departure to Houston robs this offensive line of a steady, reliable and interchangeable piece along the offensive line. The real shame of it is that we never got to see Fulton, who played best at center, teamed up with Mitch Morse at guard (where Morse could get out and run a little more than he could at center). The Chiefs might be comfortable rolling with Morse at center, Laurent Duvernay-Tardif and either Bryan Witzmann or Parker Ehinger at left guard, but no matter what, they need to add more talent to the interior to guard against injuries and/or the chance that Morse leaves via free agency after this season. Meanwhile, the Chiefs appear to be set at tackle with Eric Fisher or Mitch Schwartz, but with Cameron Erving scheduled to be a free agent after the season — and with him also doing his best work as a blocking tight end, of sorts — the Chiefs would be wise to find a long, tough, developmental prospect on the outside, too: someone who could potentially blossom after two offseasons spent with head strength coach Barry Rubin.

5. Tight end
Travis Kelce is elite, and what's more, he really seemed to mature during the course of the 2017 season. You never know when he might unleash during a game, but as a player, there's no doubt he has lots of good football left. That said, he turns 29 this year and coach Andy Reid loves using tight ends, so it wouldn't hurt to find a developmental tight end to add to this unit, especially one who can block well — an ongoing net deficiency for years now. Adding depth here could also be smart because No. 2 tight end Demetrius Harris, a gifted former basketball player who has gotten better every season, hits free agency after this season.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491614)
We have better weapons. They have more depth than we do.

Kelce, Hunt, Watkins, Hill, Conley...Ware? Chesson?

Howard, Cohen, Gabriel, Burton, Shaheen, Robinson........and then get back Kevin White and Cameron Meredith as insurance.

Kevin White as insurance. ROFL

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491627)
Kevin White as insurance. ROFL

That's some SR 22 bullshit.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:00 AM

We totally have the most weapons in the league guys. I’m sure that’s why Veach is on the phone with a 50 year old TE and Kendall Wright

ROFL

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491632)
We totally have the most weapons in the league guys. I’m sure that’s why Veach is on the phone with a 50 year old TE and Kendall Wright

ROFL

Pretty sure people have just been calling you on your bullshit....not trying to claim that the Chiefs have the most weapons.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-27-2018 10:05 AM

Speaking of solid QB deals... the #Chiefs signed Chad Henne to a 2-year deal worth $6.7M, source said. He gets $4.15M in year one and
$5.1M guaranteed (into year 2). Henne has thrown 2 passes in 3 years #backuplife

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491636)
Pretty sure people have just been calling you on your bullshit....not trying to claim that the Chiefs have the most weapons.

This.

They definitely have more of a case than the ****ing Bears do though.

ChiefGator 03-27-2018 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 13491638)
Speaking of solid QB deals... the #Chiefs signed Chad Henne to a 2-year deal worth $6.7M, source said. He gets $4.15M in year one and
$5.1M guaranteed (into year 2). Henne has thrown 2 passes in 3 years #backuplife

Those numbers don't make sense.. if it is 4.15M year one and 5.1M year two, how is that 6.7M total?

BossChief 03-27-2018 10:13 AM

“Into year 2”

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 13491638)
Speaking of solid QB deals... the #Chiefs signed Chad Henne to a 2-year deal worth $6.7M, source said. He gets $4.15M in year one and
$5.1M guaranteed (into year 2). Henne has thrown 2 passes in 3 years #backuplife

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator (Post 13491645)
Those numbers don't make sense.. if it is 4.15M year one and 5.1M year two, how is that 6.7M total?

2018:

Base Salary - $1,015,000 fully guaranteed
Signing Bonus - $1,550,000
Workout Bonus - $35k
Cap Hit: $2,600,000

2019:

Base Salary - $2,500,000 ($1M guaranteed)
Signing Bonus - $1,550,000
Workout Bonus: $50k
Cap Hit: $4,100,000

O.city 03-27-2018 10:15 AM

You guys would rather have Watkins than Odell? Ya'll nuts.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:16 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">With Tyrod Taylor, Drew Stanton and a QB to be drafted later, the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Browns?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Browns</a> are expected to shop Cody Kessler, who started 8 games in 2016. <a href="https://t.co/ETyrWlE8vQ">https://t.co/ETyrWlE8vQ</a></p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/978658491425611779?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491655)
You guys would rather have Watkins than Odell? Ya'll nuts.

Odell would cost not only a draft pick (and a high one at that) but a brand new ****ing contract for a dude who's already had multiple off the field issues.

ChiefGator 03-27-2018 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491651)
2018:

Base Salary - $1,015,000 fully guaranteed
Signing Bonus - $1,550,000
Workout Bonus - $35k
Cap Hit: $2,600,000

2019:

Base Salary - $2,500,000 ($1M guaranteed)
Signing Bonus - $1,550,000
Workout Bonus: $50k
Cap Hit: $4,100,000

Better.. thanks.

It is quite a bit guaranteed, between signing bonus and base salary guarantee in year 2. oh well.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491658)
Odell would cost not only a draft pick (and a high one at that) but a brand new ****ing contract for a dude who's already had multiple off the field issues.

We just gave a brand new contract to a dude that can't stay on the field and produce.

ChiefGator 03-27-2018 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491655)
You guys would rather have Watkins than Odell? Ya'll nuts.

Odell is nuts... he has said he wants to be paid more than anyone else in football. Seriously..

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491658)
Odell would cost not only a draft pick (and a high one at that) but a brand new ****ing contract for a dude who's already had multiple off the field issues.

Exactly. With all of our holes on defense, we’re better off holding on to our picks.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491661)
We just gave a brand new contract to a dude that can't stay on the field and produce.

A 3 year deal, yes. That deal can also be gone around the time that we'll need to pay for Hill.

Odell wants $20 million a season.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:20 AM

Odell can't want the moon made out of cheese. Doesn't mean he'll get it.

Red Dawg 03-27-2018 10:20 AM

[QUOTE=O.city;13491655]You guys would rather have Watkins
No player is worth the trouble he causes. They constantly answer questions about OBJ 24/7. He's a drama queen to the max and gets by on pure talent. Not a leader at all and certainly not worth forking over a large deal. You pay mature players that a re studs and leaders that act professional. He is none of that.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491636)
Pretty sure people have just been calling you on your bullshit....not trying to claim that the Chiefs have the most weapons.

Bullshit?

Wilson is gone
Conley probably won’t be completely ready due to Achilles
Ware probably won’t be ready due to MCL
Incompletions Harris should be cut yesterday
Demarcus Robinson is very overrated
DAT sucks

Not bullshit when our GM shares this opinion and has signed a RB and is actively talking deals with Kendall Wright and Ben Watson

O.city 03-27-2018 10:20 AM

You guys remember you wanna hold on to the picks. Don't me ball washing when Veach uses them to trade up this year.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491671)
Bullshit?

Wilson is gone
Conley probably won’t be completely ready due to Achilles
Ware probably won’t be ready due to MCL
Incompletions Harris should be cut yesterday
Demarcus Robinson is very overrated
DAT sucks

Not bullshit when our GM shares this opinion and has signed a RB and is actively talking deals with Kendall Wright and Ben Watson

Reading is imperative

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491672)
You guys remember you wanna hold on to the picks. Don't me ball washing when Veach uses them to trade up this year.

Was this supposed to be English?

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491671)
Bullshit?

Wilson is gone
Conley probably won’t be completely ready due to Achilles
Ware probably won’t be ready due to MCL
Incompletions Harris should be cut yesterday
Demarcus Robinson is very overrated
DAT sucks

Not bullshit when our GM shares this opinion and has signed a RB and is actively talking deals with Kendall Wright and Ben Watson

Your reading comprehension ****ing sucks.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13490583)
Suh to Rams, 1 year $14M

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/kpn5b6huP1">pic.twitter.com/kpn5b6huP1</a></p>&mdash; Wade Phillips (@sonofbum) <a href="https://twitter.com/sonofbum/status/978399846016073728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491672)
You guys remember you wanna hold on to the picks. Don't me ball washing when Veach uses them to trade up this year.

Yea, but it’s a different story if we’re using them to trade up for a defensive player.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:28 AM

Nick Jacobs says we have $7.3 million in cap space after Damien Williams.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Jacobs71/...46811790446593

O.city 03-27-2018 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491683)
Yea, but it’s a different story if we’re using them to trade up for a defensive player.

But with all the holes, wouldn't you say we need more picks not less?

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491676)
Your reading comprehension ****ing sucks.

Yeah I definitely missed that...

O.city 03-27-2018 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491675)
Was this supposed to be English?

Yeah, sorry.

Just saying everyone now is against trading picks. But when they trade picks in the draft, it'll be ok.

Seems off to me.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:35 AM

I do agree wit RunKC in that the Bears could have the best weapons if all works out well.

Theres a few teams I'd take over them right now, but in the future maybe no.

I'd say the top line the CHiefs can put up there is right there with anyone right now.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491688)
But with all the holes, wouldn't you say we need more picks not less?

Yea, but we’d be trading up to plug one of those holes, presumably with a 1st round talent, as opposed to trading a draft pick for a WR, so I’d be fine with that.

If we traded up for a LG, I’d be pissed.

Mother****erJones 03-27-2018 10:36 AM

Keep that cap room for draft and rollover next year

O.city 03-27-2018 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491700)
Yea, but we’d be trading up to plug one of those holes, presumably with a 1st round talent, as opposed to trading a draft pick for a WR, so I’d be fine with that.

If we traded up for a LG, I’d be pissed.

I'm just not sure about trading up due to the cost or likely cost.

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491661)
We just gave a brand new contract to a dude that can't stay on the field and produce.

Watkins has missed 12 games to injury. OBJ has missed 16.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

If I were the Browns, I'd offer 4 and 33 to the Giants for Odell.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13491707)
Watkins has missed 12 games to injury. OBJ has missed 16.

Now lets look at their production.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491703)
I'm just not sure about trading up due to the cost or likely cost.

Same here, but if we do, I get it.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491713)
Same here, but if we do, I get it.

Depends on the cost.

If it's not terrible, do it.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491699)
I do agree wit RunKC in that the Bears could have the best weapons if all works out well.

Theres a few teams I'd take over them right now, but in the future maybe no.

I'd say the top line the CHiefs can put up there is right there with anyone right now.

My thing is, let’s learn from the past. We get a brash of injuries every year. Look at who we have put out there as depth to cover for those injuries.

Frank Zombo, Kenneth Acker, Philip Gaines, Justin Hamilton, Incompletrious Harris, Orson Charles.

Really want Veach to work on that. It’s been a big problem IMO

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491709)
If I were the Browns, I'd offer 4 and 33 to the Giants for Odell.

Wut? Dudes super talented but there's way too many ?s about him to invest that much draft capital into him.

O.city 03-27-2018 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491718)
My thing is, let’s learn from the past. We get a brash of injuries every year. Look at who we have put out there as depth to cover for those injuries.

Frank Zombo, Kenneth Acker, Philip Gaines, Justin Hamilton, Incompletrious Harris, Orson Charles.

Really want Veach to work on that. It’s been a big problem IMO

That's league wide though.

Usually, the teams left standing are the ones that stay the healthiest. Lotta luck in play.

They definitely need more depth though.

Best22 03-27-2018 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491718)
My thing is, let’s learn from the past. We get a brash of injuries every year. Look at who we have put out there as depth to cover for those injuries.

Frank Zombo, Kenneth Acker, Philip Gaines, Justin Hamilton, Incompletrious Harris, Orson Charles.

Really want Veach to work on that. It’s been a big problem IMO

You should follow other NFL teams more. KC had fewer injuries than most teams in 2017

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491700)
Yea, but we’d be trading up to plug one of those holes, presumably with a 1st round talent, as opposed to trading a draft pick for a WR, so I’d be fine with that.

If we traded up for a LG, I’d be pissed.

It wouldn't bother me at all because the Chiefs have been looking for a long term solution at LG since Brian Waters retired.

A stud left guard would also help Morse and Fisher, along with finally being able to have a serious ground attack between the tackles.

RunKC 03-27-2018 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491722)
That's league wide though.

Usually, the teams left standing are the ones that stay the healthiest. Lotta luck in play.

They definitely need more depth though.

Yeah I get that. My main takeaway from it was Zombo. We all loathed having this guy on the field in 2016. Glad they addressed it and got Tanoh in the draft.

We seemed to have struck gold with Terrance Mitchell at first. It sucks that he fell apart last season. I think we all thought that we stole a solid corner.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491732)
It wouldn't bother me at all because the Chiefs have been looking for a long term solution at LG since Brian Waters retired.

A stud left guard would also help Morse and Fisher, along with finally being able to have a serious ground attack between the tackles.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m fine with taking a LG at any point in the draft. I just wouldn’t like to see us waste more than one pick to do so.

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Best22 (Post 13491726)
You should follow other NFL teams more. KC had fewer injuries than most teams in 2017

wut

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491736)
Don’t get me wrong, I’m fine with taking a LG at any point in the draft. I just wouldn’t like to see us waste more than one pick to do so.

Since Colquitt was re-signed and the Chiefs have Butker, I'm good with them packaging a 6th or 7th with their 2nd round pick to move up and grab a guard, safety, CB or D lineman and if a stud is there, one of their 4th round picks.

I still believe it's highly unlikely that the Chiefs are able adequately address every need long term this offseason so if the 10 year starter at guard is there, get him.

staylor26 03-27-2018 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491745)
Since Colquitt was re-signed and the Chiefs have Butker, I'm good with them packaging a 6th or 7th with their 2nd round pick to move up and grab a guard, safety, CB or D lineman and if a stud is there, one of their 4th round picks.

I still believe it's highly unlikely that the Chiefs are able adequately address every need long term this offseason so if the 10 year starter at guard is there, get him.

I’d be fine with that as well. I should’ve specified any trade up including our 2nd AND a 3rd in 2018/2019 (or better).

Pasta Little Brioni 03-27-2018 10:59 AM

O is a damn loon

Shoes 03-27-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491709)
If I were the Browns, I'd offer 4 and 33 to the Giants for Odell.

Way too much for Odell- yes he is a premier receiver but OBJ's value takes a slight dip since he is due for a massive raise next season. Two first round picks (essentially) on their rookie deals for the next 4 seasons has way more value in my opinion.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491745)
Since Colquitt was re-signed and the Chiefs have Butker, I'm good with them packaging a 6th or 7th with their 2nd round pick to move up and grab a guard, safety, CB or D lineman and if a stud is there, one of their 4th round picks.

I still believe it's highly unlikely that the Chiefs are able adequately address every need long term this offseason so if the 10 year starter at guard is there, get him.

If Braden Smith is there at #54.....I'm taking him.

BossChief 03-27-2018 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator (Post 13491664)
Odell is nuts... he has said he wants to be paid more than anyone else in football. Seriously..

And got knocked out in a nightclub not too long ago

RunKC 03-27-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491745)
Since Colquitt was re-signed and the Chiefs have Butker, I'm good with them packaging a 6th or 7th with their 2nd round pick to move up and grab a guard, safety, CB or D lineman and if a stud is there, one of their 4th round picks.

I still believe it's highly unlikely that the Chiefs are able adequately address every need long term this offseason so if the 10 year starter at guard is there, get him.

Have you looked up Frank Ragnow? OL from Arkansas who can play G or C. Gave up zero sacks in 41 games in the SEC.

He just seems like a guy Andy would love. I have a strong suspicion that he could be our pick at 54.

Rausch 03-27-2018 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491732)
It wouldn't bother me at all because the Chiefs have been looking for a long term solution at LG since Brian Waters retired.

A stud left guard would also help Morse and Fisher, along with finally being able to have a serious ground attack between the tackles.

This.

All these weapons are useless if Mahomes doesn't have time or is on his ass.

And think back to how bad we were at times in short yardage. It wasn't because of Hunt (who's tough as nails) it was because our line was getting dominated...

UChieffyBugger 03-27-2018 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491711)
Now lets look at their production.

Doesn't Watkins have one of the best TD record's In NFL history by the age of 24? I believe he may have been ranked In the top ten or something.

UChieffyBugger 03-27-2018 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491750)
If Braden Smith is there at #54.....I'm taking him.

His whole family are Chiefs fans as well apparently.

ForeverChiefs58 03-27-2018 11:12 AM

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oXWYdVYnN...hit%2Borig.gif

O.city 03-27-2018 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491745)
Since Colquitt was re-signed and the Chiefs have Butker, I'm good with them packaging a 6th or 7th with their 2nd round pick to move up and grab a guard, safety, CB or D lineman and if a stud is there, one of their 4th round picks.

I still believe it's highly unlikely that the Chiefs are able adequately address every need long term this offseason so if the 10 year starter at guard is there, get him.

I think there may be a starting LG in the 3rd round, I'd prefer moving up for a safety, or corner.

UChieffyBugger 03-27-2018 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13491614)
We have better weapons. They have more depth than we do.

Kelce, Hunt, Watkins, Hill, Conley...Ware? Chesson?

Howard, Cohen, Gabriel, Burton, Shaheen, Robinson........and then get back Kevin White and Cameron Meredith as insurance.

You forgot we have Robinson, DAT and Williams on the roster as well? The only Bears offensive weapon who would have a chance at KC is Robinson, the rest don't even come close to the quality we have imo.

O.city 03-27-2018 11:13 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Giants?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Giants</a> are listening to trade calls/talks for Odell Beckham Jr and there have been several, I’m told. <a href="https://twitter.com/wyche89?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@wyche89</a> says the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rams?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rams</a> No. 23 pick is available. ... what’s not clear is whether NY actually wants to trade him. Definitely open to listening, tho</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/978681228697243649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


All you ****s that called me out for saying it was crazy can suck one.

ToxSocks 03-27-2018 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491773)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Giants?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Giants</a> are listening to trade calls/talks for Odell Beckham Jr and there have been several, I’m told. <a href="https://twitter.com/wyche89?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@wyche89</a> says the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rams?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rams</a> No. 23 pick is available. ... what’s not clear is whether NY actually wants to trade him. Definitely open to listening, tho</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/978681228697243649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


All you ****s that called me out for saying it was crazy can suck one.

LMAO

Shoes 03-27-2018 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491773)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Giants?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Giants</a> are listening to trade calls/talks for Odell Beckham Jr and there have been several, I’m told. <a href="https://twitter.com/wyche89?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@wyche89</a> says the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rams?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rams</a> No. 23 pick is available. ... what’s not clear is whether NY actually wants to trade him. Definitely open to listening, tho</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/978681228697243649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


All you ****s that called me out for saying it was crazy can suck one.

#23 I believe is about fair value for OBJ. Interesting to see if Giants bite or not.

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491770)
I think there may be a starting LG in the 3rd round, I'd prefer moving up for a safety, or corner.

Yeah maybe, it's all speculation at this point but I will say that if 5 QB's do go in the first round, there should be plenty of options for the Chiefs at #54.

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13491746)
I’d be fine with that as well. I should’ve specified any trade up including our 2nd AND a 3rd in 2018/2019 (or better).

Oh yeah, I'm with you there but I would be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for a guard.

Actually, I'd be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for any player.

Not only is that a lot of draft capital for one player, it also puts an enormous amount of pressure on that player to perform at a high level immediately.

KChiefs1 03-27-2018 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491560)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Giants’ HC Pat Shurmur on Odell Beckham Jr.: “He’s on our team right now.”</p>— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/978612777186099202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Yeah, we should have done this instead of Watkins.



You’d take OBJ over Sammy Watkins?

Not me.

O.city 03-27-2018 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491802)
Oh yeah, I'm with you there but I would be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for a guard.

Actually, I'd be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for any player.

Not only is that a lot of draft capital for one player, it also puts an enormous amount of pressure on that player to perform at a high level immediately.

Yeah, this is why I'm just not a huge fan of trading up. They're already lacking in picks this year.

O.city 03-27-2018 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 13491807)
You’d take OBJ over Sammy Watkins?

Not me.

Uh, yeah.

The Franchise 03-27-2018 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491810)
Uh, yeah.

And pay him $20 million plus each year? And give up multiple picks since we don't have a 1st round pick?

O.city 03-27-2018 11:42 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Raiders are releasing tight end Clive Walford who was a former 3rd-round pick, per source. Expected to find a new home quickly.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/978688092541542400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Here's a good backup TE to Kelce.

O.city 03-27-2018 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13491817)
And pay him $20 million plus each year? And give up multiple picks since we don't have a 1st round pick?

Sure?

DaneMcCloud 03-27-2018 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491809)
Yeah, this is why I'm just not a huge fan of trading up. They're already lacking in picks this year.

As I mentioned earlier, I’m good with packaging up a 6 and either or both of their 7’s but there’s likely to be too much value in the third to trade either of those picks.

It also wouldn’t kill me to see them package up one of their 4th’s with the 2nd or 3rd to get a guy that projects as an immediate starter/rotational player, but the thirds just hold too much value this year to package with a 2nd, IMO.

O.city 03-27-2018 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491825)
As I mentioned earlier, I’m good with packaging up a 6 and either or both of their 7’s but there’s likely to be too much value in the third to trade either of those picks.

It also wouldn’t kill me to see them package up one of their 4th’s with the 2nd or 3rd to get a guy that projects as an immediate starter/rotational player, but the thirds just hold too much value this year to package with a 2nd, IMO.

I'll be interested to see the cost of a potential move up.

I'd give up one of the additional picks, but I always prefer a pick in each round.

BossChief 03-27-2018 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13491802)
Oh yeah, I'm with you there but I would be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for a guard.

Actually, I'd be shocked if Veach gave up a 2nd and a 3rd for any player.

Not only is that a lot of draft capital for one player, it also puts an enormous amount of pressure on that player to perform at a high level immediately.

I wouldn’t be shocked at all.

In fact, I kinda expect it.

He sure seems like he wants to get back into the first round.

Here’s my thinking based on verbiage used by Veach and Dorsey in the past on how they stack their board.

They will have a group of “elite” talent, position by position and which of those fits what they are looking for at each position and weigh each one on impact value they would supply. Then, it’s “next tier talent” (this is where they had Kareem Hunt graded)...so on and so forth.

After that, they are going to have a board based on team needs the next 3 years and how they want to form the roster based on meed, current players and the cap situation of the team.

That will give them groupings of players for each position that they give a total grade on that factors everything in.

If a guy with an elite grade at a position of need slips to the 20s in the draft, I think there’s a high likelihood they package this and next years second to move up to get him so they get that fifth year option.

Sassy Squatch 03-27-2018 11:54 AM

Today NFL team owners will vote to increase the debt limit for the Rams new stadium, which according to internal league documents is now projected to cost an amazing $4.963 billion.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-27-2018 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13491822)
Sure?

Loon.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.