ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Dorsey gone?

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Dorsey gone? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308394)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12927805)

I'm guessing Reid wants more control over player personnel and Hunt is gonna give Reid what he wants. Face it, no new GM will be hired that is not a yes man to Reid.

You mean like the yes man coaches that Smellway hires exclusively?

In this clip rap states the Chiefs have the BEST 53 man roster in the NFL. Damn!!!!

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...e-to-part-ways

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 12928139)

We're not going after a big name. Andy Reid runs the show and that makes the job unappealing to up and coming outsiders. We'll promote Veach, as we should for continuity purposes. At this point, we just have to hope Reid really is that good at building an organization.

That's my gut feeling as well. I don't know much about him, but I assume he will have two tasks, be a yes man and play the part of Andy's whipping boy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 12928151)

Yep. I'm betting Clark wanted assurances for a long term deal and Dorsey wanted an "OUT" just in case something in GB presented itself. Rather than deal with it next year before the draft, or later down the line, Clark cut ties now.

THIS

Clark wanted full commitment. Dorsey wanted to wait and see.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12928160)

THIS

Clark wanted full commitment. Dorsey wanted to wait and see.

That's fine and reasonable. But that is something you check on BEFORE Ballard leaves, not months after.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12928162)

That's fine and reasonable. But that is something you check on BEFORE Ballard leaves, not months after.

It can be a fluid situation.. where things can change quickly. Could be that a conversation between GB and Dorsey took place after Ballard was already gone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12927792)

Chiefs fan

https://media.giphy.com/media/10bR02lqANvmkU/giphy.gif

That's hilarious.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He probably just wanted to get away from the week 2 clamoring for the rookie from the fans and didn't have the stomach to fight through that circus all season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12928144)

He didn't have a problem paying Pioli, Reid, Dorsey out the gate and eating a year of Dorsey's contract and several years of Pioli's.

If its a $ issue then you have to believe Dorsey was wanting something unreasonable and Clark has a limit on what he thinks a GM is worth in comparison to what he has working there now like Veach.

Clark had no choice but to pay Pioli. Clark had to suck it up and spend money to be able to get this team out of the hell hole it was in.

The management that was here the last four years was as good of management that this team has ever had in it's entire history. It was also one of the best in the entire league and this team as it stands today is set up for long-term success the same way the Packers have been for a long long time.

I trust to Terez because he's always had great information about this team that's been truthful. If what he is reporting is true and Clark didn't want to pay to keep Dorsey, then fans should want Clark to step down a new ownership to take over.

You absolutely do not try to fix what is not broken and this is exactly what Clark is done. Losing Chris Ballard and John Dorsey in the same off-season is a tremendous Backstep to what has been One of the best managed teams.

this should come as a surprise to nobody. After all, Clark was the only person in his family that voted to keep that shithead Scott Pioli. If it wasn't for Clark siblings, we would've never fired that guy.

Here's my shitty list

Nick Caserio - not every NE'er is a pisspocket like Pioli
Eliot Wolf - why would he leave GB unless Gutekunst is already guaranteed the promotion
Brett Veach - most likely, IMO
Lake Dawson - Rooney rule or something (insert Ray Farmer here too)
Peyton Manning - just because. If Lynch and Elway can make that leap, so can he. Unless he wants to go straight to ownership. And in that case, **** it, I'm in. Let him take over for chunt so he can go kick his little soccer ball all around Legends.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12928167)

It can be a fluid situation.. where things can change quickly. Could be that a conversation between GB and Dorsey took place after Ballard was already gone.

In that case either Dorsey lied and screwed us or Clark waited way too long to figure this out.

Where's The Bad Guy when you need him

https://omny.fm/shows/between-the-li...t-as-chiefs-gm

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

Originally Posted by tatorhog (Post 12928179)

I would give both of my nuts to have Peyton Manning as the GM. Imagine Mahomes working with Peyton.