ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs hire Steve Spagnuolo as new defensive coordinator (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=320876)

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070926)
Ford will have trade value. The "team has no leverage" nonsense is just that. Nonsense.

By that measure, Chiefs had no leverage with Alex Smith. Leverage is created by more than one team being interested. If Chiefs put non-exclusive tag on Ford, more than 1 team will be interested.

I wouldn't trade him unless you're getting a high 2 at minimum. The league is starved for pass rushers and not many are hitting the market.

Other teams will value him more than we do also. The nfl forgets quickly. Only chiefs fans will look at his injury history as a major deterrent for a long term deal. A pass rush starved team with a gm looking for a quick move to help his job.. I think a 1 and 2 is where I’d start talking but I’d settle for a 1 and a 3 or 4 and the market will be out there.

Reerun_KC 01-24-2019 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefoftheKeyboard (Post 14070925)
Are you serious? Lol

Same thing we went through when Sutton was hired. After the indy debacle, I rode Sutton hard about being trash... Took shit from everyone while Alex was shitting the bed and the defense couldnt always win games.

4 years later....

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070930)
And if one gets fired for having a poor defense what happens? Will they get another job in the league?

Yes! It happens all the time.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070930)
And if one gets fired for having a poor defense what happens? Will they get another job in the league?

Some won't because of age, but most of them would.

Joe Woods was supposed to be the next best thing when he took over for Wade Phillips. His units weren't even close to being as good as Wade's. Al Holcomb was supposed to be a rising star last year as a new coordinator. Best Woods and Holcomb did was passing game coordinator for their new teams.

Defensive coordinator is not a place head coaches go to break in new guys. Retreads are all over the league. Belichick is going to a retread next year in Schiano too.

You didn't know 90% of the names on that list did you?

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070936)
Same thing we went through when Sutton was hired. After the indy debacle, I rode Sutton hard about being trash... Took shit from everyone while Alex was shitting the bed and the defense couldnt always win games.

4 years later....

So what is it? You called Sutton trash but were saying the defense couldn't always win the game? Seems pretty contradictory.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070936)
Same thing we went through when Sutton was hired. After the indy debacle, I rode Sutton hard about being trash... Took shit from everyone while Alex was shitting the bed and the defense couldnt always win games.

4 years later....

I never liked the Sutton hire. This dude shut down the best offense of all time in the Super Bowl. Not some bs regular season win. If you look at his shit seasons it was all bad situations.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14070934)
They're getting a 2 and more or a player for player swap at least. I think Spag is going to have a lot of interest in getting Jason Pierre-Paul back somehow if it would be feasible.

He had a really nice year for Tampa. He's probably going to be a big part of a hybrid defense Bowles will run.

Reerun_KC 01-24-2019 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070942)
So what is it? You called Sutton trash but were saying the defense couldn't always win the game? Seems pretty contradictory.

Welcome to CP

UChieffyBugger 01-24-2019 10:21 PM

SHAWN BARBER EXPLAINS HOW SPAGS IS AS A COACH HERE

BryanBusby 01-24-2019 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070946)
He had a really nice year for Tampa. He's probably going to be a big part of a hybrid defense Bowles will run.

I think he's pretty big into playing in particular systems. Will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.

Will also be interesting to see if the Giants keep Janoris Jenkins or let him go.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070948)
Welcome to CP

Nice deflection.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:23 PM

I think Landon Collins could be someone to look out for that spag would want

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:24 PM

People always view this stuff with homer glasses. One week ago, all the talk around here was how the Chiefs' defense was actually good at home. Rather than looking at what QBs they had faced at home (almost all shit), they ignored the warning signs.

Steve Spagnuolo is a guy that had a couple of good defenses a decade ago when he had DE's like Strahan (HOF'er) Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and JPP.

In 2007, his three best DE's combined for over 300 career sacks.
In 2011, his three best DE's combined for over 210 career sacks.

No shit he had good defenses back then. Christ, Greg Robinson could have coordinated a great unit with that talent.

The best thing you can say about him is that when he had the best DL of the last generation he didn't **** it up, but that's damning with faint praise.

Even in 2016 he had two good-great ends and three All-Pro DBs. No one could **** that up.

BryanBusby 01-24-2019 10:25 PM

I don't see the Giants letting Landon Collins go.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070956)
People always view this stuff with homer glasses. One week ago, all the talk around here was how the Chiefs' defense was actually good at home. Rather than looking at what QBs they had faced at home (almost all shit), they ignored the warning signs.

Steve Spagnuolo is a guy that had a couple of good defenses a decade ago when he had DE's like Strahan (HOF'er) Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and JPP.

In 2007, his three best DE's combined for over 300 career sacks.
In 2011, his three best DE's combined for over 210 career sacks.

No shit he had good defenses back then. Christ, Greg Robinson could have coordinated a great unit with that talent.

The best thing you can say about him is that when he had the best DL of the last generation he didn't **** it up, but that's damning with faint praise.

Even in 2016 he had two good-great ends and three All-Pro DBs. No one could **** that up.

And when he had bad defenses he didn’t have much talent, but you continue to ignore that part.

DC’a need talent and a good situation to be successful. It’s not that complicated.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:25 PM

He's actually exactly right, There are very few 1st time DC's doing a good job in the NFL. And with Andy Reid and the way he approaches the defensive side there was no way he was ever going with a dude who had never done it before.

You can say retread all you want but the truth is, what happens if they hire a 1st time DC and he isn't cut out for basically being completely in charge of his side of the ball? You're talking about a total meltdown that season.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14070959)
And when he had bad defenses he didn’t have much talent, but you continue to ignore that part.

DC’a need talent and a good situation to be successful. It’s not that complicated.

Bad defenses and bad talent sounds a lot like what he'll have here.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:27 PM

Ken Norton looked like the worst DC in the NFL when he was with the Raiders.

This year in Seattle, he did a damn good job with that D.

Reerun_KC 01-24-2019 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14070960)
He's actually exactly right, There are very few 1st time DC's doing a good job in the NFL. And with Andy Reid and the way he approaches the defensive side there was no way he was ever going with a dude who had never done it before.

You can say retread all you want but the truth is, what happens if they hire a 1st time DC and he isn't cut out for basically being completely in charge of his side of the ball? You're talking about a total meltdown that season.

Fair to say an experience DC had a total meltdown in KC this year, and a few other critical playoff games during his tenure...

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070956)
People always view this stuff with homer glasses. One week ago, all the talk around here was how the Chiefs' defense was actually good at home. Rather than looking at what QBs they had faced at home (almost all shit), they ignored the warning signs.

Steve Spagnuolo is a guy that had a couple of good defenses a decade ago when he had DE's like Strahan (HOF'er) Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and JPP.

In 2007, his three best DE's combined for over 300 career sacks.
In 2011, his three best DE's combined for over 210 career sacks.

No shit he had good defenses back then. Christ, Greg Robinson could have coordinated a great unit with that talent.

The best thing you can say about him is that when he had the best DL of the last generation he didn't **** it up, but that's damning with faint praise.

Even in 2016 he had two good-great ends and three All-Pro DBs. No one could **** that up.

I'm still not a huge fan of it, but with the pass rush last year generating that many sacks, I think Spags will get the most out of that.

I'm going to be very curious to see what position coaches stay on staff.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14070963)
Ken Norton looked like the worst DC in the NFL when he was with the Raiders.

This year in Seattle, he did a damn good job with that D.

Pete Carroll runs that defense.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070961)
Bad defenses and bad talent sounds a lot like what he'll have here.

So it wouldn’t have mattered who we hired because there’s not a DC in the NFL that can make chicken salad out of chicken shit.

Might as well just skip the draft a free agency too.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 14070965)
Fair to say an experience DC had a total meltdown in KC this year, and a few other critical playoff games during his tenure...

It could actually end up worse than that...you can bitch and all but guess what look at the numbers, Who has done well never being a DC before? Who are the hot young DC's in the league right now?

It's an honest question I don't think this current team is the time to roll with a dude with no experience.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14070959)
And when he had bad defenses he didn’t have much talent, but you continue to ignore that part.

DC’a need talent and a good situation to be successful. It’s not that complicated.

Exactly! The ppl saying this shit probably don’t know Belichick used to be a sub .500 coach with the browns lol. You gotta have talent at some point.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070961)
Bad defenses and bad talent sounds a lot like what he'll have here.

It's tough for me to say they have bad talent when Hitchens played a lot better in Dallas and other teams were interested in him, and they have 3 guys who could post double digit sacks.

They need more secondary talent and will potentially need to figure out a MLB or SLB, but there are pieces to work with.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14070970)
It could actually end up worse than that...you can bitch and all but guess what look at the numbers, Who has done well never being a DC before? Who are the hot young DC's in the league right now?

It's an honest question I don't think this current team is the time to roll with a dude with no experience.

They certainly aren't. The head coach isn't going to be involved in anything defense related.

There's very, very few teams that are taking chances on first-time DC's. The only ones doing that are defensive head coaches.

BryanBusby 01-24-2019 10:31 PM

I don't think it's so much of an thing where the Chiefs took a retread as it doesn't seem like he really did a coaching search at all and tripped allover his dick to hand the job to someone in his inner circle.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070966)
I'm still not a huge fan of it, but with the pass rush last year generating that many sacks, I think Spags will get the most out of that.

I'm going to be very curious to see what position coaches stay on staff.

The Chiefs have proven you can have a ton of sacks and still have a really bad defense, and they did that without relying on the blitz. If you add a blitz-happy DC you'll probably notice an uptick against young/bad QBs, but what happens when you face QBs that thrive against the blitz, especially if you don't have press-man corners?

This feels exactly like a move from the Pioli years.

RealSNR 01-24-2019 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 14070886)
1/2 of CP. The same 1/2 that thought Geno Smith was our QBOTF

Oh shut the **** up. There are like two guys who really ****ing hate this hire and are predicting doom. Everyone else seems to have wanted somebody else but is at least slightly intrigued about some of the new possibilities with alignments we can try out. Re-purposing players is sometimes the key to unlocking a player's full potential, like it was for Derrick Johnson in 2009.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070961)
Bad defenses and bad talent sounds a lot like what he'll have here.

That’s not true at all. The point of firing Sutton is bc the sum was worse than the individual talent. He will get way more out of the talent we have, or at worst break even- something Sutton couldn’t do.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070976)
The Chiefs have proven you can have a ton of sacks and still have a really bad defense, and they did that without relying on the blitz. If you add a blitz-happy DC you'll probably notice an uptick against young/bad QBs, but what happens when you face QBs that thrive against the blitz, especially if you don't have press-man corners?

This feels exactly like a move from the Pioli years.

Who would you have hired?

RealSNR 01-24-2019 10:33 PM

Would some of you really rather have had Mike Smith as your DC?

Didn't ****ing think so.

Sassy Squatch 01-24-2019 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14070982)
Would some of you really rather have had Mike Smith as your DC?

Didn't ****ing think so.

That's legit the only reason I'm even lukewarm on this hire. The mere thought of hiring within had me ****ing pissed off.

suzzer99 01-24-2019 10:35 PM

So if we tag & trade Ford, does the team that gets him have the same rights as we do - potentially to franchise him another 2 years?

If we just let him walk we get a 3rd rounder basically?

chiefzilla1501 01-24-2019 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070956)
People always view this stuff with homer glasses. One week ago, all the talk around here was how the Chiefs' defense was actually good at home. Rather than looking at what QBs they had faced at home (almost all shit), they ignored the warning signs.

Steve Spagnuolo is a guy that had a couple of good defenses a decade ago when he had DE's like Strahan (HOF'er) Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and JPP.

In 2007, his three best DE's combined for over 300 career sacks.
In 2011, his three best DE's combined for over 210 career sacks.

No shit he had good defenses back then. Christ, Greg Robinson could have coordinated a great unit with that talent.

The best thing you can say about him is that when he had the best DL of the last generation he didn't **** it up, but that's damning with faint praise.

Even in 2016 he had two good-great ends and three All-Pro DBs. No one could **** that up.

I don't think many, not on CP at least, are doing cartwheels over the hire. There are no homer glasses. Any positive comments are basically saying it won't be hard to be better than Sutton and top 25 is a more than achievable bar for spagnuolo. I certainly don't think claims that he's a consistent bottom 2 defense are at all fair based on what was going on during those seasons.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070976)
The Chiefs have proven you can have a ton of sacks and still have a really bad defense, and they did that without relying on the blitz. If you add a blitz-happy DC you'll probably notice an uptick against young/bad QBs, but what happens when you face QBs that thrive against the blitz, especially if you don't have press-man corners?

This feels exactly like a move from the Pioli years.

I don't agree at all about the Pioli years. Spags loves zone blitzes. I'm not sure how much press-man he ran, but the zone blitz was a staple of those Giants teams from what I remember.

The secondary was completely lost. There were more blown assignments this year than I can recall ever happening. That has to change. There was a massive communication breakdown and that's probably the biggest task for him to fix.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:36 PM

I think that is the problem, there is bitching to bitch because who else were you gonna hire?

Hewitt and McDonald weren't options here with no playcalling experience, Kris Richard wasn't getting out of Dallas...at that point who are you left with?

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:36 PM

The only good argument for an experienced DC that isn’t a ****ing jack ass like Rex would be Jack del rio, who seems committed to the bengals. For winning the Sb next year this was the right hire even if it’s boring to some of you.

suzzer99 01-24-2019 10:36 PM

Btw I don't remember anyone around here being that jacked about getting Reid - and that's worked out pretty well.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070972)
It's tough for me to say they have bad talent when Hitchens played a lot better in Dallas and other teams were interested in him, and they have 3 guys who could post double digit sacks.

They need more secondary talent and will potentially need to figure out a MLB or SLB, but there are pieces to work with.

If two of those guys post double digit sacks by blowing all responsibility or ability to stop the run in the process they are more rotational players than building blocks.

Regarding Hitchens--it's not like the scheme was complicated. The counterargument is that playing alongside other elite LBs made him look better than he was.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 14070985)
So if we tag & trade Ford, does the team that gets him have the same rights as we do - potentially to franchise him another 2 years?

If we just let him walk we get a 3rd rounder basically?

I think the acquiring team would have a long-term deal in place for him if they are trading.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14070987)
I don't agree at all about the Pioli years. Spags loves zone blitzes. I'm not sure how much press-man he ran, but the zone blitz was a staple of those Giants teams from what I remember.

The secondary was completely lost. There were more blown assignments this year than I can recall ever happening. That has to change. There was a massive communication breakdown and that's probably the biggest task for him to fix.

If anything we can stop paying a bajillion dollars for safeties as even his good defenses didn't need all pros there.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14070988)
I think that is the problem, there is bitching to bitch because who else were you gonna hire?

Hewitt and McDonald weren't options here with no playcalling experience, Kris Richard wasn't getting out of Dallas...at that point who are you left with?

Hamas shit on my thread about Wilks before he got fired, so I know he wouldn’t have even been happy with a hire like that had he been available.

Seriously, that guy is 100% bitching just to bitch.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:39 PM

Yes, he could play on the tag and then they could tag him once more. If he walks it depends on what he gets in FA. He’d probably get a huge deal so we’d get a 3rd rd comp pick the following year.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:39 PM

It was seriously Rex Ryan or Spags...or an in house hire and no one wanted that.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 14070985)
So if we tag & trade Ford, does the team that gets him have the same rights as we do - potentially to franchise him another 2 years?

If we just let him walk we get a 3rd rounder basically?

Yes, he could play on the tag and then they could tag him once more. If he walks it depends on what he gets in FA. He’d probably get a huge deal so we’d get a 3rd rd comp pick the following year.

Sassy Squatch 01-24-2019 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14071000)
It was seriously Rex Ryan or Spags...or an in house hire and no one wanted that.

Yep. Just fired Sutton and started the search a couple of weeks (or a year, depending on who you ask) too late.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14070981)
Who would you have hired?

Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14070992)
If two of those guys post double digit sacks by blowing all responsibility or ability to stop the run in the process they are more rotational players than building blocks.

Regarding Hitchens--it's not like the scheme was complicated. The counterargument is that playing alongside other elite LBs made him look better than he was.

Stop avoiding my question.

Who the **** would you have hired? What sure fire defensive mastermind are we all forgetting about here?

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14070997)
Hamas shit on my thread about Wilks before he got fired, so I know he wouldn’t have even been happy with a hire like that had he been available.

Seriously, that guy is 100% bitching just to bitch.

WTF are you talking about?

CoMoChief 01-24-2019 10:42 PM

Guess this means goodbye Dee Ford.

He has zero place in a 43 alignment.

Sassy Squatch 01-24-2019 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071005)
Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

Apparently Kris Richard calls plays and is the de facto DC in Dallas. Has to be a HC interview, unless Dallas grants permission (which I'm assuming they wouldn't)

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:43 PM

Kris Richard was in no way getting out of Dallas, they can block anything that isn't a HC interview.

jerryaldini 01-24-2019 10:43 PM

Don't forget about Rags and Dirty Dan! Interception machines!

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071005)
Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

Kris. Richard. Wasn’t. An. Option.

Chris Hewitt has absolutely no experience as a DC

And John Pagano? LMAO you can’t possibly be this ****ing stupid

pugsnotdrugs19 01-24-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071005)
Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

Pagano? Wtf.

How can you throw his name in there and then shit on Spagnuolo or other veteran DCs. Pagano didnt exactly set the world on fire with his SD defenses.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071014)
Kris. Richard. Wasn’t. An. Option.

Chris Hewitt has absolutely no experience as a DC

And John Pagano? LMAO you can’t possibly be this ****ing stupid

Why?
So?
Why?

BleedingRed 01-24-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14071000)
It was seriously Rex Ryan or Spags...or an in house hire and no one wanted that.

I’d have rolled Rex Ryan 10/10 times, less risky... AND you have a chance for a top 10 defense next year

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071005)
Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

Richard said today that there are some head coaching jobs he would decline to stay with the Cowboys. He was never realistic.

Pagano was a pretty meh coordinator with the Chargers. He was terrible in Oakland.

Hewitt, who knows, but it doesn't seem like the league wants young DC's.

BryanBusby 01-24-2019 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071005)
Kris Richard is the obvious top target. John Pagano and Chris Hewitt would be others.

I think I would have liked John Pagano even less.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071008)
WTF are you talking about?

Sutton’s scheme actually was very complicated if you’ve ever heard ppl talk about it. That’s why there were a lot of communication breakdowns that led to blown coverages. And if you watched, you’d notice hitch was trying to read things before reacting. It made him look slow but really he was taking a second to read what he needed to do.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14071024)
I think I would have liked John Pagano even less.

Agreed. Pagano has had virtually zero success in this league.

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14071018)
I’d have rolled Rex Ryan 10/10 times, less risky... AND you have a chance for a top 10 defense next year

Ryan is actually more risky because he and Reid are like oil and water as personalities and his defense is outdated these days.

chiefzilla1501 01-24-2019 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14071018)
I’d have rolled Rex Ryan 10/10 times, less risky... AND you have a chance for a top 10 defense next year

Except the risk that his defense is no longer relevant in the NFL and that he'd be unwilling to change it.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefoftheKeyboard (Post 14071026)
Sutton’s scheme actually was very complicated if you’ve ever heard ppl talk about it. That’s why there were a lot of communication breakdowns that led to blown coverages. And if you watched, you’d notice hitch was trying to read things before reacting. It made him look slow but really he was taking a second to read what he needed to do.

Shawn Barber was talking about it today I think. He was a coaching intern with the Chiefs and said Sutton's scheme wasn't simple.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14071016)
Pagano? Wtf.

How can you throw his name in there and then shit on Spagnuolo or other veteran DCs. Pagano didnt exactly set the world on fire with his SD defenses.

Exactly. This guy is a ****ing idiot and always has been.

To call Spags an “atrocious” hire when the best you got is John ****ing Pagano?

LMAO

O.city 01-24-2019 10:47 PM

Rex has also been in the media for a couple years

I doubt he’s really up on the league as he would need to be

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14071018)
I’d have rolled Rex Ryan 10/10 times, less risky... AND you have a chance for a top 10 defense next year

The risk with Rex is his personality. Wouldn’t have meshed with how reid wants his team handled. Especially in the media.

The Bad Guy 01-24-2019 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14071028)
Ryan is actually more risky because he and Reid are like oil and water as personalities and his defense is outdated these days.

Yeah, Rex could be either really good or it could be a completely combustible situation and could totally lose a locker room.

O.city 01-24-2019 10:48 PM

I still would have liked Ray Horton

Mecca 01-24-2019 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14071030)
Shawn Barber was talking about it today I think. He was a coaching intern with the Chiefs and said Sutton's scheme wasn't simple.

I think that may have been the biggest issue, sometimes the best defensive just man up and play hard and fast.

The Chiefs look like a team that thinks way to much on that side.

BryanBusby 01-24-2019 10:49 PM

Sutton's system was pretty complex and I really doubt he was working all that hard to teach it to the younger guys, which is why he always stuck with his old vets even if they sucked out loud.

I think Hewitt would have been my top choice, along with bringing in someone like Dick LeBeau to be a senior advisor till he got established. Oh well.

pugsnotdrugs19 01-24-2019 10:49 PM

Rex definitely looked like a boom or bust hire on the surface. Like SB champs or **** everything up type of hire.

ChiefoftheKeyboard 01-24-2019 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 14071030)
Shawn Barber was talking about it today I think. He was a coaching intern with the Chiefs and said Sutton's scheme wasn't simple.

And I think that will be the biggest immediate difference. Less thinking and just getting back to playing ball.

staylor26 01-24-2019 10:49 PM

Spags has at east proven that if you give him the talent, he can produce a SB caliber defense.

What in the ****ing bloody hell has John Pagano EVER proven?

I’m convinced this dumbass thinks he’s talking about Chuck.

Sassy Squatch 01-24-2019 10:49 PM

Yes, let's hire a DC who is infinitely more abrasive with his approach to coach the exact same goddamn shitty ****ing scheme that players were already getting frustrated with. What could go wrong?!?

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-24-2019 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14071016)
Pagano? Wtf.

How can you throw his name in there and then shit on Spagnuolo or other veteran DCs. Pagano didnt exactly set the world on fire with his SD defenses.

Ranks:

16, 9, 20, 21, 23

For those worried about experience, he'd done it before. Didn't have great talent, and never coordinated defenses as bad as the ones either Sutton or Spagnuolo have. Also has done a good job in Houston and isn't archaic.

Monkey God 01-24-2019 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071017)
Why? He can only interview for HC jobs.
So? This team doesn't need someone learning the "on the job" Need to win now.
Why? the fact you asked that says why

The fact you asked that says why.

tk13 01-24-2019 10:51 PM

I agree it's not a young and exciting name but I'd take this over Rex 100 out of 100 times. Chiefs fans obsession with Rex Ryan is just so bleh. The guy hasn't done squat in a decade either, but gives good press conferences and that's what the fans love I guess. Might as well just throw dynamite in the locker room and save yourself the time.

Spags is going to need talent, but I think that's true regardless. The truly great defenses have been loaded with talent. There aren't many Bill Belichick's out there making chicken salad. I don't really care about the 4-3/3-4 thing. We just need someone who can put out a defense that is disciplined and can make adjustments. We shall see.

KC Hawks 01-24-2019 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 14070951)
SHAWN BARBER EXPLAINS HOW SPAGS IS AS A COACH HERE

Great stuff, especially what Barber said about Spags coaching the position coaches vs Sutton who left them alone. Also interesting about Ford possibly playing SAM linebacker.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.