ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs PFF: Poor game from Fisher (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275422)

RunKC 08-20-2013 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9903094)
Curious, how could we have fielded a Super Bowl team this year in your opinion?

In his world, Ziggy Ansah would have been a better pick because Fisher is a " project" but yet Ansah isn't.

It's butthurt.

Mav 08-20-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9903116)
The greatest part of all this? We get to discuss high-round fatties some more!

GOD I HOPE THIS TREND NEVER ENDS!/Lil Chiefy

You heart it.

I predict Sammy Watkins is your first pick next year.

Cannibal 08-20-2013 09:58 PM

I'm not sure, are the people crying about Fisher right now Geno Smith cum guzzlers?

RunKC 08-20-2013 09:59 PM

And here is a nice concept people should realize. It is entirely possible for something to be both Albert and Alex's fault.

They both looked bad and they both played bad against the 49ers. And both of them had a hand in the other looking bad.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9903131)
I'm not sure, are the people crying about Fisher right Geno Smith cum guzzlers?

We sure ****ing are, and right now no one in the universe can convince me that taking this injury-prone turnstile was a better idea than rolling the dice on a gold-toof dawg.

Mav 08-20-2013 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9903131)
I'm not sure, are the people crying about Fisher right now Geno Smith cum guzzlers?

You had to ask?

Cannibal 08-20-2013 10:00 PM

Kinda figured that was the case.

saphojunkie 08-20-2013 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9903106)
If Denver drafted Eric Fisher at 30th overall and he was playing as bad for Denver as he has for KC...these dumbass truefans would be laughing at Denver for making that pick.

But, the guy has an Arrowhead on his helmet so we should all just back off.

You're right about that. And I don't think we should be backing off Fisher. I just think it's reeruned to call him out specifically for sucking when the entire offensive line - including chiefsplanet darling Branden Albert - had similar evenings.

This also goes back to Training Camp, when the only thing you were hearing was that Fisher was getting ****ed up all over the place. Then you watch it and realize there's plenty of plays where he is more than holding his own. It's just misleading.

I'd rather see a video of every Fisher pass protection play than just the gifs of his lowlights.

jd1020 08-20-2013 10:00 PM

Isn't Geno starting the next game for the Jets?

RunKC 08-20-2013 10:00 PM

Hey Clay, Geno looked horrible in practice. 3 INT's in one practice and the coach calling him out.

I know for damn sure that you're not just going to ignore that shit.

Cannibal 08-20-2013 10:01 PM

ROFL

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903144)
Hey Clay, Geno looked horrible in practice. 3 INT's in one practice and the coach calling him out.

I know for damn sure that you're not just going to ignore that shit.

We talkin' 'bout practice?

Mav 08-20-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9903143)
Isn't Geno starting the next game for the Jets?

He is......

Says a lot about their plans for him. if he plays well he will start week one id bet.

MeatRock 08-20-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903135)
We sure ****ing are, and right now no one in the universe can convince me that taking this injury-prone turnstile was a better idea than rolling the dice on a gold-toof dawg.

LMAO

saphojunkie 08-20-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903135)
We sure ****ing are, and right now no one in the universe can convince me that taking this injury-prone turnstile was a better idea than rolling the dice on a gold-toof dawg.

I wanted Geno Smith as much as absolutely anyone, but injury-prone turnstile is just horrible hyperbole. Always one step too far with you.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903142)
I'd rather see a video of every Fisher pass protection play than just the gifs of his lowlights.

Whatever good Fisher did is outweighed by the bad.

Mav 08-20-2013 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903155)
I wanted Geno Smith as much as absolutely anyone.

Injury-prone turnstile. Damn you are hyperbolic.

Isnt it cute to hear that Eric Fisher is injury prone, but Geno Smith twisted his ****ing ankle in the open field ON HIS OWN......

Yet, Eric Fisher is the injury prone one.

saphojunkie 08-20-2013 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903159)
Whatever good Fisher did is outweighed by the bad.

That's reeruned.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903163)
That's reeruned.

The guy had a -4.5 grade. In 30 snaps.

It's hard to suck that bad.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-20-2013 10:06 PM

Let's trade Albert to SF for another shitty Receiver!/Lil Chiefy

RunKC 08-20-2013 10:06 PM

If he sucks this bad on a consistent basis next month, then I'll start to worry. Until then, relax.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 10:07 PM

This thread is hot tonight, boyo.

It's like Eric Fisher put on his best **** me pumps, a couple of push up bras and went out to a hot new club to get free drinks from horny homers.

MeatRock 08-20-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903166)
The guy had a -4.5 grade. In 30 snaps.

It's hard to suck that bad.

Not really hard, there have been others. We have had our share of turnstiles in the past.

saphojunkie 08-20-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903171)
This thread is hot tonight, boyo.

It's like Eric Fisher put on his best **** me pumps, a couple of push up bras and went out to a hot new club to get free drinks from horny homers.

And then Larry Johnson threw a drink in his face.

saphojunkie 08-20-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903170)
If he sucks this bad on a consistent basis next month, then I'll start to worry. Until then, relax.

No, if he sucks this bad for the whole preseason then we have a serious problem. I'm hoping this is just an injury. But even then, we have to hope the injury heals.

He cannot continue to play this badly and us have a hope of making the playoffs.

I'm not exactly optimistic about him, but I'm hoping it was just the whole offensive line not being prepared for a beastly defense.

BossChief 08-20-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9903086)
I thought that too. And that would make sense. A guy who was a dominant left tackle at a Mid Level D1 school making the transition to the pros struggling with his technique at the pro level is to be expected. he will get it figured out....

So we are back to trying to justify a project right tackle at first overall?

Great.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9903094)
Curious, how could we have fielded a Super Bowl team this year in your opinion?

If I was privy to the information GMs are privy to, I'd say I'd have done something like this:

1) Sign Matt Moore instead of trading two seconds for Alex Smyth and cut Matt Cassel.

2) Trade down to 12 with Miami, adding another second rounder.



3) Draft EJ Manuel, Geno Smith. depending on who interviewed/worked out the best. Not who I thought would be an immediate impact quarterback, but who I thought had the highest achievable ceiling.

4) take Robert Woods with our second rounder to help give our drafted quarterback a chance with two good receivers.

5) Draft Margus Hunt with our traded for second rounder from Miami

6) I like the Travis Kelce pick, so I'll actually keep that one at the top of the third.

7) Alex Okeafor with the comp third.

8) Nico Johnson with the fourth

9) coupled my 5 and 7th rounders to move up to take Marcus Lattimore

10) Bacardi Rambo in the 6th

11) Tyler Bray with the 6th comp pick

As far as FA goes, I am OK with Sean Smith, Fasano, Hussein, Devito, Jordan and Avery.

I would still have my second rounder next year and would be VERY excited about the short and long term future of this team.

How's that?

BossChief 08-20-2013 10:39 PM

Crickets?

Mav 08-20-2013 10:43 PM

Boss Chief-

Lets get something really clear.

Im not trying to justify anything. Just because he isn't mowing down an entire defense by himself after not even a full games worth of professional action, doesn't in any way shape or form mean he is a "project". He is transitioning.

I stated this before. In Joe Thomas' very first NFL regular season game as a professional gave up 4 sacks by himself against the Steelers in a 34-7 home loss.

Now, this is one of the BEST 3 Tackles in the league. So I guess with the logic being displayed here, he was a project pick as well.

chiefzilla1501 08-20-2013 10:48 PM

The fact is...
This front office will be judged on the QB we have in year 3, and the QBs we passed on. Period.

The Smith trade. Passing on Geno. Etc... None of that matters, even the trade value, if we have a franchise QB in 3 year, even if by some miracle, that ends up being Alex Smith.


Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9903208)
So we are back to trying to justify a project right tackle at first overall?

Great.



If I was privy to the information GMs are privy to, I'd say I'd have done something like this:

1) Sign Matt Moore instead of trading two seconds for Alex Smyth and cut Matt Cassel.

2) Trade down to 12 with Miami, adding another second rounder.



3) Draft EJ Manuel, Geno Smith. depending on who interviewed/worked out the best. Not who I thought would be an immediate impact quarterback, but who I thought had the highest achievable ceiling.

4) take Robert Woods with our second rounder to help give our drafted quarterback a chance with two good receivers.

5) Draft Margus Hunt with our traded for second rounder from Miami

6) I like the Travis Kelce pick, so I'll actually keep that one at the top of the third.

7) Alex Okeafor with the comp third.

8) Nico Johnson with the fourth

9) coupled my 5 and 7th rounders to move up to take Marcus Lattimore

10) Bacardi Rambo in the 6th

11) Tyler Bray with the 6th comp pick

As far as FA goes, I am OK with Sean Smith, Fasano, Hussein, Devito, Jordan and Avery.

I would still have my second rounder next year and would be VERY excited about the short and long term future of this team.

How's that?


BossChief 08-20-2013 10:55 PM

I don't care to hear anything from you. You aren't anywhere near as smart as you think you are in football terms, you are condescending and then pull the "I want to keep this about football only" card constantly, you are a quitter, you don't have any ability to be interesting and your only redeemable quality is that you served in the military, but the loads of other stuff about you personally cancelled that positive out and swung the pendulum the other way.

Nobody here respects you or your takes because we are all loyal fans of a team that is normally bad, but we stick through thick and thin, and you jump ship whenever you
decide the weather changes.

The saddest part?

You are only here because you are Alex Smiths personal condom/dicksock.

Get lost.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 10:57 PM

http://i.imgur.com/bX2nfQ6.jpg

Albert sure is getting beaten on this play. ROFL

BossChief 08-20-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903233)
The fact is...
This front office will be judged on the QB we have in year 3, and the QBs we passed on. Period.

The Smith trade. Passing on Geno. Etc... None of that matters, even the trade value, if we have a franchise QB in 3 year, even if by some miracle, that ends up being Alex Smith.

I agree mostly.

The part I don't is that Alex needs to "hit the ground running" it's not like the guy has a 10 year window here. His window of effectiveness is likely 4-6 years (max)

For the trade to be a success, it needs to happen QUICKLY.

Remember, this was a "win right now" move.

RunKC 08-20-2013 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9903208)
So we are back to trying to justify a project right tackle at first overall?

Great.



If I was privy to the information GMs are privy to, I'd say I'd have done something like this:

1) Sign Matt Moore instead of trading two seconds for Alex Smyth and cut Matt Cassel.

2) Trade down to 12 with Miami, adding another second rounder.



3) Draft EJ Manuel, Geno Smith. depending on who interviewed/worked out the best. Not who I thought would be an immediate impact quarterback, but who I thought had the highest achievable ceiling.

4) take Robert Woods with our second rounder to help give our drafted quarterback a chance with two good receivers.

5) Draft Margus Hunt with our traded for second rounder from Miami

6) I like the Travis Kelce pick, so I'll actually keep that one at the top of the third.

7) Alex Okeafor with the comp third.

8) Nico Johnson with the fourth

9) coupled my 5 and 7th rounders to move up to take Marcus Lattimore

10) Bacardi Rambo in the 6th

11) Tyler Bray with the 6th comp pick

As far as FA goes, I am OK with Sean Smith, Fasano, Hussein, Devito, Jordan and Avery.

I would still have my second rounder next year and would be VERY excited about the short and long term future of this team.

How's that?

Thank God some of you guys aren't the GM. Matt Moore leading this team=5-11 at best.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903248)
Thank God some of you guys aren't the GM. Matt Moore leading this team=5-11 at best.

Most of us would be willing to go 5-11 if it meant we were developing a young QB.

It's a lot more enticing than going 8-8 with Alex Smith.

BossChief 08-20-2013 11:09 PM

Matt Moore has a winning record starting for talentless teams.

He had a 98+ rating in 2009
87+ rating in 2011
96+ rating in 2012

He has never played on a team with as much talent as we have in KC, either.

A quarterback like that coupled with a drafted quarterback >>>> Alex Smith and Chase Daniel.

SAUTO 08-20-2013 11:13 PM

I was all for Matt hasselback
Posted via Mobile Device

chiefzilla1501 08-20-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9903247)
I agree mostly.

The part I don't is that Alex needs to "hit the ground running" it's not like the guy has a 10 year window here. His window of effectiveness is likely 4-6 years (max)

For the trade to be a success, it needs to happen QUICKLY.

Remember, this was a "win right now" move.

I think Alex Smith is the best guy to win us some games quickly. By a mile. I like him better than Matt Moore.

But yeah... I don't think his window is 5 years and I don't think he wins us a Super Bowl. I'm only happy with the Alex Smith trade if he gets us winning again and we have a different QB in 3 years, unless he makes a big transformation.

RealSNR 08-20-2013 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903248)
Thank God some of you guys aren't the GM. Matt Moore leading this team=5-11 at best.

Who gives a ****? Everybody here says Alex Smith was the best we could do this year.

That's dogshit. We can do better, and you know it.

I'm willing to punt this one away and try again next year. One year doesn't make a ****ing difference when you're trying to build a dynasty and make the entire country forget that the Chiefs ever sucked this much shit for so long.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9903275)
I'm willing to punt this one away and try again next year. One year doesn't make a ****ing difference when you're trying to build a dynasty and make the entire country forget that the Chiefs ever sucked this much shit for so long.

I didn't give a shit about wins this year.

All I wanted to see was a QB making some plays and showing some long-term potential by December.

We aren't going to see that for at least three years now.

chiefzilla1501 08-20-2013 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9903275)
Who gives a ****? Everybody here says Alex Smith was the best we could do this year.

That's dogshit. We can do better, and you know it.

I'm willing to punt this one away and try again next year. One year doesn't make a ****ing difference when you're trying to build a dynasty and make the entire country forget that the Chiefs ever sucked this much shit for so long.

There is no excuse for not winning games now.

Arrowhead is deflated. Players don't want to come here anymore. And yes, the Chiefs spent a shitload of non-cap money on coaches and front office. They should have some need to make that money back.

I don't blame Clark Hunt if his directive is to win games ASAP, even if you're not a real Super Bowl team. What matters is if we stubbornly stick to this team and say a playoff win or two is good enough. Alex Smith was the best safe option out there. He can definitely lead us to a playoff win. To win super bowls, we need to do better. I'll give this front office a year or 2 to figure that out.

BossChief 08-20-2013 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903266)
I think Alex Smith is the best guy to win us some games quickly. By a mile. I like him better than Matt Moore.

But yeah... I don't think his window is 5 years and I don't think he wins us a Super Bowl. I'm only happy with the Alex Smith trade if he gets us winning again and we have a different QB in 3 years, unless he makes a big transformation.

I think Alex is better than Matt Moore, but I think winning it all is the ultimate goal and giving up two premium picks for the difference between the two is a huge waste of resources.

A team with Matt Moore and two second round talents is better than Alex without those players.

Both scenarios have replaceable quarterbacks, but one scenario has two additional quality players on it when the QB is replaced.

Hammock Parties 08-20-2013 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903283)
Alex Smith was the best safe option out there. He can definitely lead us to a playoff win.

I'd be utterly shocked if we ever get close to such a thing with him.

My opinion of him has dropped like a rock since preseason started.

RealSNR 08-20-2013 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903283)
There is no excuse for not winning games now.

Arrowhead is deflated. Players don't want to come here anymore. And yes, the Chiefs spent a shitload of non-cap money on coaches and front office. They should have some need to make that money back.

I don't blame Clark Hunt if his directive is to win games ASAP, even if you're not a real Super Bowl team. What matters is if we stubbornly stick to this team and say a playoff win or two is good enough. Alex Smith was the best safe option out there. He can definitely lead us to a playoff win. To win super bowls, we need to do better. I'll give this front office a year or 2 to figure that out.

Did you see the Ravens game in 2010? We couldn't even ****ing fill Arrowhead for a goddamn playoff game.

Arrowhead is probably permanently deflated, and I think it has to do with the fact that there aren't enough people in KC rich enough to blow that much money on attending a game in an era when you can watch that shit nearly ANYWHERE. You don't even need cable TV to do it.

I'm not from Kansas City. I haven't been to a game in Arrowhead since 2003. Clark Hunt may worry about filling the stadium, but what REALLY matters is growing out your product.

People become fans of teams when they have STARS. That's how the Packers are able to make it in tiny ass Green Bay, WI. They have stars. They invest in those stars. And when their stars get old, they go out and get MORE stars.

Alex Smith is not a star. He's an insult. And that's why nobody will ever give a shit about the Chiefs, which DRAMATICALLY affects the dollars and cents.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903286)
I'd be utterly shocked if we ever get close to such a thing with him.

My opinion of him has dropped like a rock since preseason started.

Because you base way too much of your opinion on meaningless preseason games.

I was not impressed with Alex Smith either. But he is clearly a bubble playoff QB who is a longshot to do anything big in the playoffs.

Hammock Parties 08-21-2013 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903306)
Because you base way too much of your opinion on meaningless preseason games.

Perhaps, but to me the preseason is a confirmation of what I already knew about him.

And I also think preseason games aren't as meaningless as people believe them to be where individual players are concerned.

Preseason meant a LOT last year.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 12:08 AM

I've talked about this a few times in other threads.

The reason Chiefs' fans didn't care about the 2010 Chiefs is because of Pioli's reeruned media blackout. The team was impossible to like. Charismatic guys like Bowe were forced to give canned answers to the media. That may not matter to you, but it matters to the true fans. And Alex Smith is going to be a popular player among true fans.

I can guarantee you that with the media blitz they've pulled, if this team wins games, Arrowhead will be back. I hope we don't fall into the same dumb trap of settling for happy fans but medium team. But it will be good to get some excitement at Arrowhead again.


Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9903290)
Did you see the Ravens game in 2010? We couldn't even ****ing fill Arrowhead for a goddamn playoff game.

Arrowhead is probably permanently deflated, and I think it has to do with the fact that there aren't enough people in KC rich enough to blow that much money on attending a game in an era when you can watch that shit nearly ANYWHERE. You don't even need cable TV to do it.

I'm not from Kansas City. I haven't been to a game in Arrowhead since 2003. Clark Hunt may worry about filling the stadium, but what REALLY matters is growing out your product.

People become fans of teams when they have STARS. That's how the Packers are able to make it in tiny ass Green Bay, WI. They have stars. They invest in those stars. And when their stars get old, they go out and get MORE stars.

Alex Smith is not a star. He's an insult. And that's why nobody will ever give a shit about the Chiefs, which DRAMATICALLY affects the dollars and cents.


Sorter 08-21-2013 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903306)
Because you base way too much of your opinion on meaningless preseason games.

I was not impressed with Alex Smith either. But he is clearly a bubble playoff QB who is a longshot to do anything big in the playoffs.

I don't think preseason games are meaningless.

aturnis 08-21-2013 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9902967)
Alberts a fifth year vet that couldn't hand off a de on a basic cb blitz from a trips set.


Again, Albert is a good player but he needs a lot of work still

I've said this 100 times already. The blitz pickups are on the coaches. Period. I don't believe I saw a single one picked up that night and the 9ers blitzed all night.

Also, have you guys never heard vet Olinemen talk about why they don't like the preseason? It's b/c the majority of vets in the trenches have an understanding that they aren't going fill speed. Then you always have young guys coming in trying to price something, and that's when guys get hurt.

I'm much less worried about Albert b/c I'm not altogether sure he was playing to his usual standard. I am though worried about this lines lack of knowledge passed down by the coaches of the blocking scheme. Especially with Allen, Fisher and Hudson. These guys have less experience, and the two vets probably don't know if they can even trust then enough TO hand of blockers to them. Then there is Fisher's lack of ability. At times his footwork looks labored, and his leverage socks. I hope to hell that it is his hand.

Sorter 08-21-2013 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9903334)
I've said this 100 times already. The blitz pickups are on the coaches. Period. I don't believe I saw a single one picked up that night and the 9ers blitzed all night.

Also, have you guys never heard vet Olinemen talk about why they don't like the preseason? It's b/c the majority of vets in the trenches have an understanding that they aren't going fill speed. Then you always have young guys coming in trying to price something, and that's when guys get hurt.

I'm much less worried about Albert b/c I'm not altogether sure he was playing to his usual standard. I am though worried about this lines lack of knowledge passed down by the coaches of the blocking scheme. Especially with Allen, Fisher and Hudson. These guys have less experience, and the two vets probably don't know if they can even trust then enough TO hand of blockers to them. Then there is Fisher's lack of ability. At times his footwork looks labored, and his leverage socks. I hope to hell that it is his hand.


From what I remember, the 49ers never sent more than 5. Typically, your protection philosophies/principles will be designed with 5 in mind. So, for me, it's hard to really pin blame on someone yet despite my own suspicions.

aturnis 08-21-2013 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 9903081)
It looks like Fisher's feet are all ****ed up when he moves to block. He's quick stepping and allowing the rushers to blow by him. His struggles look to have nothing to do with his injured hand.

No. In that GIF, if you watch closely, he for some reason thinks he needs to help Asamoah. The quick step was him stopping and putting his left arm out to help. Then before he can recover to block his own man, he realizes "I'm a fixing idiot and just let myself get beat outside".

Hammock Parties 08-21-2013 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9903337)
No. In that GIF, if you watch closely, he for some reason thinks he needs to help Asamoah. The quick step was him stopping and putting his left arm out to help. Then before he can recover to block his own man, he realizes "I'm a fixing idiot and just let myself get beat outside".

Yep, this is exactly what it looks like to me. His brain's all ****ed up.

The thing that bothers me about that is he lacks the athletic ability to make up for it against a pretty average pass rusher.

1.1

aturnis 08-21-2013 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903155)
I wanted Geno Smith as much as absolutely anyone, but injury-prone turnstile is just horrible hyperbole. Always one step too far with you.

He's already had at last three injuries and we've seen what he can do on the field.

aturnis 08-21-2013 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903163)
That's reeruned.

We haven't even talked about his fail in the run game.

aturnis 08-21-2013 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9903187)
No, if he sucks this bad for the whole preseason then we have a serious problem. I'm hoping this is just an injury. But even then, we have to hope the injury heals.

He cannot continue to play this badly and us have a hope of making the playoffs.

I'm not exactly optimistic about him, but I'm hoping it was just the whole offensive line not being prepared for a beastly defense.

I honestly think his hand might require surgery. Maybe it's just a insignificant one like Donald Stephenson had and they play him this week, gets the procedure done, misses the 4th preseason game and stats week one a new man. Who knows.

I don't feel good watching him favor it, hurt it in the game, then go spend time with an ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON on the sideline, and not come back in.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9903135)
We sure ****ing are, and right now no one in the universe can convince me that taking this injury-prone turnstile was a better idea than rolling the dice on a gold-toof dawg.

And there it is.

Funny that fisher is injury prone. I guess geno smith and Mingo just had freak injuries.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9903337)
No. In that GIF, if you watch closely, he for some reason thinks he needs to help Asamoah. The quick step was him stopping and putting his left arm out to help. Then before he can recover to block his own man, he realizes "I'm a fixing idiot and just let myself get beat outside".

The quick stepwas to avoid contact with knife Davis, who is sprinting between them. In all the clips, he doesn't use his right arm. It really looks to me like he's favoring it. His inability to block guys isn't an athletic problem. It's that he's not getting a good punch in.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9903329)
I don't think preseason games are meaningless.

I am talking about the amount people are freaking out over these games. EEspecially in a new system and a training camp that, in my opinion, was way too short. We know what we have in Alex smith and game 2 isnt it. In the regular season, we will have more gadgetry and smith will be much better than critics like clay want him to be, but much worse than true fans want him to be.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9903339)
He's already had at last three injuries and we've seen what he can do on the field.

His had one injury that is turning into multiple. It seems to me he hurt his hand, and he injured his shoulder trying to overcompensate. To my knowledge, he played most of his college career mostly injury free. He's not injury prone just because he's getting dinged up in one preseason.

saphojunkie 08-21-2013 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9903339)
He's already had at last three injuries and we've seen what he can do on the field.

He had no history of injury in college.

I'm not saying there isn't cause for concern here, but come on, people. Your reaction should never be larger than the sample size.

saphojunkie 08-21-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903513)
And there it is.

Funny that fisher is injury prone. I guess geno smith and Mingo just had freak injuries.

If we had drafted Geno first overall and he had the same injury as well as throwing multiple dreadful INTs in practice, I'd be on full protection duty against the truefans trying to tell me he's injury prone and a bust and we should have never taken a second round talent first overall when we already had a starting QB on the roster.

GoChargers 08-21-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9903086)
I thought that too. And that would make sense. A guy who was a dominant left tackle at a Mid Level D1 school making the transition to the pros struggling with his technique at the pro level is to be expected. he will get it figured out....

He was the first overall pick. If you're taking a left tackle first overall, he'd better be the new Orlando Pace and dominate immediately from day one to even come close to justifying it.

Even then, there'd better not be any playmakers worthy of even a top 10 pick. Wasn't the case this past draft, as Tavon Austin and Dee Milliner went in the top 10.

Even with all that, the left tackle position is still increasingly irrelevant by the year as teams continue to move their best pass rushers to the right side of the field and statistics show that quarterback performance doesn't significantly differ whether pressure is coming from the left or the right. The last five Super Bowl winners did it with mediocre left tackles and half-decent O-lines at best.

So really, there's no justifying the Fisher pick in the modern NFL, and it especially looks bad because he's so raw and playing horribly in both training camp and preseason.

Sandy Vagina 08-21-2013 11:15 AM

^ people get so stupid over this 1st overall pick issue. This was one of those underwhelming drafts where there really was no clear #1 overall pick. Many felt that the top 2 players were Fisher and Joeckel. It's been two preseason games, and people are crying, JFC. Not the sexy pick, but building in the trenches is not a bad thing. If you can't protect your QB or open lanes for your RB, then you are handicapping your two key players on offense... and you DO want a better offense, right?

Pablo 08-21-2013 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9903945)
^ people get so stupid over this 1st overall pick issue. This was one of those underwhelming drafts where there really was no clear #1 overall pick. Many felt that the top 2 players were Fisher and Joeckel. It's been two preseason games, and people are crying, JFC. Not the sexy pick, but building in the trenches is not a bad thing. If you can't protect your QB or open lanes for your RB, then you are handicapping your two key players on offense... and you DO want a better offense, right?

GAMES WON IN THE TRENCHES!

Pablo 08-21-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9903922)
He was the first overall pick. If you're taking a left tackle first overall, he'd better be the new Orlando Pace and dominate immediately from day one to even come close to justifying it.

Even then, there'd better not be any playmakers worthy of even a top 10 pick. Wasn't the case this past draft, as Tavon Austin and Dee Milliner went in the top 10.

Even with all that, the left tackle position is still increasingly irrelevant by the year as teams continue to move their best pass rushers to the right side of the field and statistics show that quarterback performance doesn't significantly differ whether pressure is coming from the left or the right. The last five Super Bowl winners did it with mediocre left tackles and half-decent O-lines at best.

So really, there's no justifying the Fisher pick in the modern NFL, and it especially looks bad because he's so raw and playing horribly in both training camp and preseason.

A lot of this.

There's still time for him to turn into the most nastiest, soul eating OT of all time. Which is pretty much what he'll need to be at some point. Just wish the arrow was pointing up early on.

RunKC 08-21-2013 11:20 AM

People are implying that it was mostly Alex Smith's fault Friday. Let's take a look at what actually happened.

-No Charles.
-Bowe double covered.
-OL getting pushed back into the QB.
-Kelce and Baldwin dropping passes they should have caught.
-Rookie RB looking decent but not that great.
-Baldwin not getting separation or turning head for the ball.

Alex wasn't the factor like people are proclaiming. He was a part of many factors.

Frosty 08-21-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903963)
People are implying that it was mostly Alex Smith's fault Friday. Let's take a look at what actually happened.

-No Charles.
-Bowe double covered.
-OL getting pushed back into the QB.
-Kelce and Baldwin dropping passes they should have caught.
-Rookie RB looking decent but not that great.
-Baldwin not getting separation or turning head for the ball.

Alex wasn't the factor like people are proclaiming. He was a part of many factors.

-Chiefs' starting offense on the whole struggled through most of the first half against the 49ers' backups.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2013 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903963)
People are implying that it was mostly Alex Smith's fault Friday. Let's take a look at what actually happened.

-No Charles.
-Bowe double covered.
-OL getting pushed back into the QB.
-Kelce and Baldwin dropping passes they should have caught.
-Rookie RB looking decent but not that great.
-Baldwin not getting separation or turning head for the ball.

Alex wasn't the factor like people are proclaiming. He was a part of many factors.

Thank you for compiling the season excuse-list early.

Sandy Vagina 08-21-2013 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9903980)
Thank you for compiling the season excuse-list early.

Yeah, really. What QB needs his receivers to get open, catch balls thrown in their hands, or blockers to protect him.

Excuses! http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/u...___by_auge.gif



... but this thread was about Fisher, RunKC.

Mav 08-21-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9903513)
And there it is.

Funny that fisher is injury prone. I guess geno smith and Mingo just had freak injuries.

Well, yes, Mingo did have a freak injury. They still don't know how he ended up with a bruised lung.
Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9903922)
He was the first overall pick. If you're taking a left tackle first overall, he'd better be the new Orlando Pace and dominate immediately from day one to even come close to justifying it.

Even then, there'd better not be any playmakers worthy of even a top 10 pick. Wasn't the case this past draft, as Tavon Austin and Dee Milliner went in the top 10.

Even with all that, the left tackle position is still increasingly irrelevant by the year as teams continue to move their best pass rushers to the right side of the field and statistics show that quarterback performance doesn't significantly differ whether pressure is coming from the left or the right. The last five Super Bowl winners did it with mediocre left tackles and half-decent O-lines at best.

So really, there's no justifying the Fisher pick in the modern NFL, and it especially looks bad because he's so raw and playing horribly in both training camp and preseason.

He was the First overall pick in a top 10 draft that was littered with offensive linemen. As I have stated. 7 of the top 12 were offensive linemen with one receiver, 3 pass rushers, and a corner taken. They didn't see Milliner as a need because they already had Flowers, Sean Smith, and Dunta Robinson. They didn't need a pass rusher because they have both Hali, and Houston, and even on draft day there was speculation they were going to move Albert.

It was the absolute worst case scenario for the Chiefs. They were damned if they did, and damned if they didn't, and had they drafted Milliner, people would of crushed them for taking another corner after spending so much in free agency on the position. The only possible outcome that would of made people happy were to reach for a qb, or to take Austin.

It sucks.

O.city 08-21-2013 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9903208)
So we are back to trying to justify a project right tackle at first overall?

Great.



If I was privy to the information GMs are privy to, I'd say I'd have done something like this:

1) Sign Matt Moore instead of trading two seconds for Alex Smyth and cut Matt Cassel.

2) Trade down to 12 with Miami, adding another second rounder.



3) Draft EJ Manuel, Geno Smith. depending on who interviewed/worked out the best. Not who I thought would be an immediate impact quarterback, but who I thought had the highest achievable ceiling.

4) take Robert Woods with our second rounder to help give our drafted quarterback a chance with two good receivers.

5) Draft Margus Hunt with our traded for second rounder from Miami

6) I like the Travis Kelce pick, so I'll actually keep that one at the top of the third.

7) Alex Okeafor with the comp third.

8) Nico Johnson with the fourth

9) coupled my 5 and 7th rounders to move up to take Marcus Lattimore

10) Bacardi Rambo in the 6th

11) Tyler Bray with the 6th comp pick

As far as FA goes, I am OK with Sean Smith, Fasano, Hussein, Devito, Jordan and Avery.

I would still have my second rounder next year and would be VERY excited about the short and long term future of this team.

How's that?

Ok, cool.

Would you consider that a Super Bowl challenging team?

I'm not crazy about Alex smith, but if they didnt like any if the qbs in this class, they didnt like them.

It is what it is

LOCOChief 08-21-2013 11:47 AM

This thread will be pure gold by December.

GoChargers 08-21-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9903990)
Yeah, really. What QB needs his receivers to get open, catch balls thrown in their hands, or blockers to protect him.

Real quarterbacks are able to throw their receivers open and make throws under pressure.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9903922)
He was the first overall pick. If you're taking a left tackle first overall, he'd better be the new Orlando Pace and dominate immediately from day one to even come close to justifying it.

Even then, there'd better not be any playmakers worthy of even a top 10 pick. Wasn't the case this past draft, as Tavon Austin and Dee Milliner went in the top 10.

Even with all that, the left tackle position is still increasingly irrelevant by the year as teams continue to move their best pass rushers to the right side of the field and statistics show that quarterback performance doesn't significantly differ whether pressure is coming from the left or the right. The last five Super Bowl winners did it with mediocre left tackles and half-decent O-lines at best.

So really, there's no justifying the Fisher pick in the modern NFL, and it especially looks bad because he's so raw and playing horribly in both training camp and preseason.

I am not a fan of drafting right tackles this high.

But again... This idea that fisher is a better draft pick if he succeeds right away is total crap. If he does really well after struggling nobody will care about a year or so of struggles, just as most people have become supportive of Brandon Albert.

RealSNR 08-21-2013 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9903997)
Well, yes, Mingo did have a freak injury. They still don't know how he ended up with a bruised lung.


He was the First overall pick in a top 10 draft that was littered with offensive linemen. As I have stated. 7 of the top 12 were offensive linemen with one receiver, 3 pass rushers, and a corner taken. They didn't see Milliner as a need because they already had Flowers, Sean Smith, and Dunta Robinson. They didn't need a pass rusher because they have both Hali, and Houston, and even on draft day there was speculation they were going to move Albert.

It was the absolute worst case scenario for the Chiefs. They were damned if they did, and damned if they didn't, and had they drafted Milliner, people would of crushed them for taking another corner after spending so much in free agency on the position. The only possible outcome that would of made people happy were to reach for a qb, or to take Austin.

It sucks.

I'd much rather have had Milliner and signed Sean Smith, and let Dunte Robinson go pound sand with some other team. Keep Eric Winston, re-sign Albert.

When the Chiefs go nickel, that's going to be a huge weakness with Robinson back there... one that is largely preventing this defense from gaining elite status.

O.city 08-21-2013 11:53 AM

I'm more upset that they didnt take Richardson than not taking a qb at 1.

chiefzilla1501 08-21-2013 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9903963)
People are implying that it was mostly Alex Smith's fault Friday. Let's take a look at what actually happened.

-No Charles.
-Bowe double covered.
-OL getting pushed back into the QB.
-Kelce and Baldwin dropping passes they should have caught.
-Rookie RB looking decent but not that great.
-Baldwin not getting separation or turning head for the ball.

Alex wasn't the factor like people are proclaiming. He was a part of many factors.

Alex is experienced enough to know the hot read. He missed it way more often than a veteran should. Was a very bad performance even if lots of people also deserve blame.

RealSNR 08-21-2013 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9904043)
I am not a fan of drafting right tackles this high.

But again... This idea that fisher is a better draft pick if he succeeds right away is total crap. If he does really well after struggling nobody will care about a year or so of struggles, just as most people have become supportive of Brandon Albert.

Branden Albert was a middle first round pick.

It's good to take raw players in that area. Look at Jason Pierre-Paul. Hell, even Dontari Poe. It shows that the team is willing to roll the dice.

It's not the same thing as taking a player like that at #1 overall.

Mav 08-21-2013 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9904046)
I'd much rather have had Milliner and signed Sean Smith, and let Dunte Robinson go pound sand with some other team. Keep Eric Winston, re-sign Albert.

When the Chiefs go nickel, that's going to be a huge weakness with Robinson back there... one that is largely preventing this defense from gaining elite status.

what was the reason for cutting Winston so quickly? was it just his outspokenness, or was it he sucked?

Frosty 08-21-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9904062)
what was the reason for cutting Winston so quickly? was it just his outspokenness, or was it he sucked?

His play was thickening.

Pablo 08-21-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9904062)
what was the reason for cutting Winston so quickly? was it just his outspokenness, or was it he sucked?

I think he was viewed as a PR cancer after he lashed out at the fans.

As far as actual play; he was an average RT. Don't know that he would have been cut if he'd have shut his mouth.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.