![]() |
Quote:
It's just not something we're gonna do here. |
Quote:
Also, Metcalf is fast. He's not just some big WR who catches lobs. He can stretch a defense. It's been a few years now, but he ran a 4.33 dash. His highlight reel isn't just jump balls. |
It's not gonna happen, but something that should be considered as we're staring down a future of this no longer being a TE based offense.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They want guys that get separation. |
Quote:
Metcalf isn't worth $30 million for the Chiefs but he can get separation. |
4 years of Rice, Worthy and THIS?
I'm coming around, no matter the cost. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/juX4JUMiQkY?si=EZkCm6Jip5VK8mur" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Seattle is looking for a 1st and 3rd for Metcalf. There is no way in hell Veach is trading for him. None. Zip. Zero. Nadda.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They aren't getting anywhere NEAR that, considering the contract he'll be asking for. General consensus seems to be a R3 pick and a 3 year, $88M deal with $40-50M guaranteed. |
Quote:
Reports are the Seahawks would be lucky to get a 2nd. No idea why trading one of 63 or 66 is a bad deal. Do we want the offense to be good again or not? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We need an average or better left tackle to be really good on offense again. That’s it. Because that is what’s going to get Mahomes back on track too. The weapons are not a problem. We’re talking about needing RB help definitely and a WR3 + 4. That’s it. |
Just sign Lockett.
Would've been cool to select him over Phil Gaines lmao |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.