bricks |
09-26-2017 07:28 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buehler445
(Post 13107038)
The only thing he has on Prime Charles' ability to run through arm tackles. But it's somewhat offset, but Charles' agility to make dudes miss. Over time fumbling will probably be better than Charles, but like I posted earlier, he's on pace to have the same number of fumbles as Charles' worst year.
Everywhere else, Charles was better. That's not to say he isn't a very pleasant surprise or that he can't improve, but you're off base man. Prime Charles was a different species of human than the rest of the guys on the field.
|
You're entitled to your own opinion and I accept that.
I've only watched two Chiefs games this year but I will say that from what I saw in both the New England and San Diego game, he was stiff arming people and using his agility to make people miss. What should've been 1 or 2 yard losses were turned into 8,9 or 10 yard gains. He did this with toughness, strength, agility and sheer will and determination. We'll see over time how his ability is to protect the ball but we do know that was one of his strong suits coming out of college.
I know this is a small sample size but in 3 games thus far, he has already proven to have more potential with respect to big playmaking ability. Dude has pulled off 3 50 yard plus runs. That's insane! Did Charles do that? Nope. I'm not gonna crown his ass already but I do think he will have an edge over Charles with respect to staying healthy. There is a better chance Hunt will be more durable than Charles because of his frame/build alone. Like I said earlier, I do feel Charles is better in some ways, but I think Hunt has more potential, and is a more balanced complete back.
|