I am just messing with you

Turn on 610 now. This host is saying Herm should come back because they may lose the young players if he doesn't come back

Yea that guy's a dumbass, he says we don't need a QB either, because you don't need a franchise QB.

Wow I'm pretty sure that Sanchez had a leg injury right before the season am I right? I remember seeing a clip before the season about Sanchez maybe missing the season opener walking around on crutches with a brace on. That makes me mildly reeruned?

You guys can promote Sanchez all you want but I'll bet my bottom dollar that Sanchez will not be better than Carson Palmer and will just be a pretty face that comes out of a USC football program. Maluaga will be ten times the player that Sanchez will be. If we take Sanchez with the #3 pick, Pioli or not, then I"ll believe that we're mildly reeruned. You can argue against me but in five years I'll still stand by the correct assessment that Stafford will be better than Sanchez.

And comparing a QB that was injured to another QB that was injured isn't dumb as shit, stop defending your USC boys so brazenly and accept that I have my opinions and you have yours.

Go to http:/articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/09/sports/sp-sanchez9

I never said that Sanchez missed games due to his injury, but the fact that he was just in practice and dislocated his knee cap is pretty unheard of for a QB that he just moved the wrong way and got injured.

This isn't the only point I have for not wanting Sanchez, but in someone that got injured strictly off of a practice throw makes me a little weary of his durability against top tier defenses. This year he didn't really face any top tier defenses outside of the rose bowl game.

WTF??

I seriously dont get this argument.

Some people act like Herm is the only coach in america who can coach up young players???

If you don't miss a game due to injury it's not significant now is it?

And it's not a remote reason to start bringing up Brodie Croyle who misses seasons...you took an injury that caused no missed game time and compared him to Croyle that means I can call you reeruned.

And he has failed at it for 3 years...

See our DL for player development...

Only a poster on chiefsplanet can try to compare a guy who had a minor injury and missed no games to a guy who's blown out both his knees and blew up his shoulder...

Yea those 2 players are obviously comparable in the injury front.

I think they both have huge upside.

I would like to see either drafted and groomed on the bench, Stafford because he needs to mature as a decision maker and Sanchez because he has much less time starting in college.

If I had to choose one that I felt could make the transition to starting in the NFL right away, that would be Sanchez because of his maturity and composure.

I chose Sanchez. After watching a few games, I think Sanchez plays in a more NFL-like offense. I'm not opposed, however, to drafting Andre Smith, sucking for another year, then drafting a QB next year. Next years draft is going to be QB rich, whereas this draft might see 3 first round QB's total.

Some of you guys should start drinking bottled water.

There has to be a dangerous level of lead in what you're currently drinking.

Im wondering why Bradford chose to stay?

Was he frightened by being taken by the Lions?

Umm the best from that junior class just came out.

yes, now that you mention it. So, I don't think the Chiefs get Sanchez OR Stafford.

Probably OL Alabama or Ole Miss in first round... or a massive attempt to trade down to someone who HAS to have stafford or sanchez.

He knows that he will be picked apart in workouts and tape study....

Riiiiiight, ok I'll give you the Croyle thing I didnt need to bring it up,

BUT

Mark Sanchez almost got taken out on a practice play snap where his KNEE buckled out on him. His coach even said "We got lucky"

Read the damn article you might learn a thing or two. I don't want a QB that has the propensity to break himself in practice. Those are the facts, deny them as you wish.