I really think they're trying to protect the young guys by keeping it conservative and trying to get momentum going with the simple stuff. But for the love of bacon, they've got to get to the point where they say "**** it, let them make mistakes in the passing game, and hopefully the improvement will outweigh the mistakes." With the state of the OLine, that could be a "win big - lose big" decision, but hell it's not like it would ruin the season's aspirations....

Gotta let the dogs loose, or we'll never know what we've got.....

100% agree Fish :thumb:

Carl can lick my unwashed taint. **** him. And Herm can eat cow dingleberries. **** that guy.

I don't mind rebuilding, when it looks like the person running the team has sense. This ****ing moron starts calling stupid shit. How about basic foundational shit so the team can actually build a solid foundation.

No, lets throw the ****ing option in there, because its part of our long term winning strategy.

Did I mention **** CARL?

Your words of fishiness ring loudly through the gill slits of truth.

FAX

So ... let me get this straight ... the article vindicates Carl because it states that Carl's demeaning, disrespectful view of the fans is a more accurate, appropriate assessment than Clark's? Is that right?

FAX

Pretty much, yeah. But is it really a demeaning, disrespectful view if it's true? Why not just say "accurate view"?

AND CHANGE (entire front office to start)

In a word, Yes.

Pure, utter bullshit.

Except that it is 100% correct. Most of the fans who talked a good game this offseason turned out to be frauds. They say they want a winner, but they gladly spend their money for Carl and his 9-7 crap year after year. And when the team tries to do the right things to build a winner, they freak out because losing ruins their Sunday afternoon.

If the Chiefs had gone out and spent a bunch of cash on overpriced overrated FAs this offseason, the seats would still be full and everyone would be lapping up Carls BS about how the team was just a few players away.

All the masses really care about is a shiny object to distract them on Sunday. How else do you explain the obsession people still have with Dick Vermeil, even though he never won anything and his years here were a disaster for the team.

I'll repeat once again, I understand KC is in a rebuilding phase, but their is no signs of progress or signs that the process is working. Essentially, they don't know WTF they are doing.

He obviously doesn't understand what you understand.

Because there really should be visible, tangible progress. After two games.

so are these Scout people surreptitiously on the Chiefs payroll? you wouldn't know they weren't by reading this crap

the team has been demonstrably worse every year during Herm's tenure. it's not like this started last week

And the two of you (who were far from the only two, so get over yourself) may be right, still.

However, the fact that he has played behind some terrible O-Lines in both college and now with the Chiefs just might have something to do with his durability issues.

He's taken a beating.

And anyone who says that hit he took to separate his shoulder woudn't have taken out any other QB is just showing their bias.

His shoulder was ground into the turf.