ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

evenfall 10-18-2011 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8003432)
A third of the population in the metro area are Mizzou fans. I'm pretty sure they're going to get a mention here and there when ****ing Alabama comes to town.

Nick Wright has said that he can't wait to cover the SEC. I mean seriously, would you rather cover the Jayhawks traveling to Lubbock to play the Red Raiders or the Tigers visiting Death Valley? The Louisville Cardinals coming to Manhattan to square off against KSU or the Gators invading Faurot?

This is going to be badass.

Wright is ready to capitalize on his rival KK making a fool of himself through this whole process, to the point where KK was intimating that they wouldn't spend much time covering Missouri. Wright is ready to accept the huddled masses of Mizzou fans yearning to breathe free of KK's butthurt.

If he thinks there won't be any local interest in Missouri, he is sadly mistaken. This will increase local awareness of Missouri, in football season especially.

Pants 10-18-2011 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 8002824)
It is more like a group of people just wanting to emote and not knowing why.

We hate you we hate you...

we hate you because you dont matter!

we hate because you messed up this great thing we had!

we hate you because we cant make up our minds about how we hate you!

Do you think it's possible that a group of people doesn't share a hivemind? I don't know, maybe different people feel differently about this? Naw, they just can't make their minds up...

lulz

duncan_idaho 10-18-2011 09:02 AM

One thing that will be interesting to see... how much will the KC market be considered a "Big 12-2-1-1" market for college football once Missouri is gone?

For basketball, KU obviously has the coverage in the market. For football, it's obvious they don't (unless they're having a miraculous season).

Missouri is the big draw among the local schools for college football.

I don't know that KU/KSU get enough TV sets during college football season that the Big 12 will get credit for that TV market when it comes time to renegotiate the football TV deals. T-shirt KU fans don't care about football, and Nebraska has as big a college football fan presence in KC as KSU. With 2/3 of the metro's population outside the league's footprint, the Big 12 might be negotiating a football deal without big markets outside Texas.

That was what ultimately destroyed the SWC (no major TV markets outside Texas)...

evenfall 10-18-2011 09:24 AM

Duncan, I think that could be an important issue. Previously, let's say half of the Kansas City metro and most all of St. Louis were Big 12 markets. Losing basically 1.5 major cities is not going to help the revenue situation, to say nothing of replacing Nebraska, Colorado, Texas A&M, and Missouri with TCU, Louisville, and whomever else.

The profile of the conference has both lessened and become even more Texas-centric than it was before Nebraska's departure. The revenue disparity is going to become wide as the SEC will be set for a big raise when the next TV deal happens, but the Big 12 can hardly expect that.

The Big 12 is a sinking ship, I think. I hope for the sake of the fans of bystanders schools that some kind of conference merge or basketball conference can be made, it would be awful for ISU fans or KSU fans or any others to be the victims here, for no sin other than being a second school in a small state. Seems kind of sad, though I agree with everyone doing what is best for their institution.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8003525)
http://www.chron.com/sports/cougars/...ce-2223466.php

Big East is reportedly inviting Houston. If my numbers are right, there are now 79 teams expected to join the Big East by 2013.

Yet they will still only have 5 football teams, and none of them will be ranked. The Mountain Conference West USA thinks the Big East is a cluster****.

track 10-18-2011 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8003528)
Wright is ready to capitalize on his rival KK making a fool of himself through this whole process, to the point where KK was intimating that they wouldn't spend much time covering Missouri. Wright is ready to accept the huddled masses of Mizzou fans yearning to breathe free of KK's butthurt.

If he thinks there won't be any local interest in Missouri, he is sadly mistaken. This will increase local awareness of Missouri, in football season especially.


One more reason not to listen to that nut job Wright.

|Zach| 10-18-2011 09:38 AM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NpVWoF57sZg?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Saul Good 10-18-2011 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by track (Post 8003692)
One more reason not to listen to that nut job Wright.

Amen. Why would I care about the Florida\Georgia, LSU\Auburn, and Alabama\Tennessee games when I could hear about BYU/Baylor, Iowa State\Louisville, and Texas Tech\Kansas?

eazyb81 10-18-2011 09:48 AM

Now this can't be right. I have been assured by Stewie and a few other CP Mensa members that the Big 12's TV deal will be massive with or without Mizzou. Texas will get a blank check from the networks and divide it equally among its brothers in arms. WTF?

http://campuscorner.kansascity.com/n...#ixzz1b9Ct9spI

Quote:

Big 12 future with and w/out Mizzou


By Blair Kerkhoff - Posted on 18 October 2011



How’s this for influence?

Missouri holds the key to membership in three conferences: Big 12, SEC and Big East.

Will the Tigers be one of 10 or 12 in the Big 12 or the 14th in the SEC? If it’s the latter, how does this impact Louisville and West Virginia in the Big East?

After talking to several sources in the Big 12, the general feeling is this: If Missouri stays in the Big 12, the league is more likely to stay at 10, with TCU replacing Texas A&M as the lone move.

But if Mizzou goes to the SEC, the Big 12 could look more favorably at a 12-team arrangement.

The idea is without Missouri the Big 12 would need more than one replacement to bring value to its football contracts.


Louisville is the most suggested addition to the Big 12, but West Virginia, and its stronger football brand, is the favorite of some in the Big 12, if it’s a one-team add.

Cincinnati can’t be ruled out if multiple Big East teams are the answer for the Big 12.

Brigham Young is not out of the Big 12 expansion picture, an official said. BYU athletic director Tom Holmoe said on Saturday that there have been discussions between the Big 12 and BYU but no invitation.

Holmoe smartly reminded reporters how quickly the TCU action transpired, in a matter of days from the initial call from Big 12 interim athletic director Chuck Neinas to the press conference introducing the Horned Frogs to the conference.

As for potential Big East candidates, that league has voted to raise its exit fee from $5 to $10 million. Big East bylaws also require a 27-month notice, which wouldn’t make any member available to a new conference until the middle of the 2013-14 season.

Later today, Big East Commissioner John Marinatto will hold a news conference to discuss his league's future.



evenfall 10-18-2011 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8003722)
Amen. Why would I care about the Florida\Georgia, LSU\Auburn, and Alabama\Tennessee games when I could hear about BYU/Baylor, Iowa State\Louisville, and Texas Tech\Kansas?

It's not like the local media ever spent a huge amount of time covering Texas/Texas A&M or other games far afield while still being in the conference. I am sure the coverage of the SEC would all be from an MU perspective. Keitzman just acted a fool through the whole process, swearing there was no interest in Missouri, that the big 12 is more stable, that it would be foolish, that the money really isn't better, and also, scaring fans that their school won't get media coverage. He was trying to wield whatever influence he had on the process, no doubt about that. Turns out is didn't have much, even after trying everything.

He almost seems to have been going through the Kubler/Ross grief stages over the demise of the B12.

Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance

I wonder what will be heard today. Anger? Sour grapes? This is an upgrade? Acceptance...?

Dayze 10-18-2011 10:02 AM

when it's all said and done, KK will ignore the fact that he's been completely wrong at every turn and somehow spin it into 'see, this is exactly what I said would happen"

Pitt Gorilla 10-18-2011 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by track (Post 8003692)
One more reason not to listen to that nut job Wright.

Actually, it's a pretty strong argument to listen to him.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 12:55 PM

KK is coming up on the radio. Today's meltdown should be classic.

Saulbadguy 10-18-2011 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8004141)
KK is coming up on the radio. Today's meltdown should be classic.

He's such a jerk!! :mad:

http://www.fileunderhorrible.com/wp-...dio-show-1.jpg

vailpass 10-18-2011 01:12 PM

This thread is circular, like the snake eating itself. I look for updates here but find the same thing over and over again. It's like CNN.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 01:29 PM

Might as well give up being a Mizzou fan...they are no better than the Royals according to KK.

evenfall 10-18-2011 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8004141)
KK is coming up on the radio. Today's meltdown should be classic.

Just beating the "Missouri can't compete in the SEC" drum, starting by playing a clip from Herbstreit and saying that he didn't really mean what he said when he said Missouri would walk in around the equator of that conference, and that they could compete.

That will be the party line I guess, "you are gonna get killed over there", because its not falsifiable except over the course of years.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 8004159)

I've got no problem listening to him. His tears sustain me. If he wants to pull down his pants and march down Main Street for attention and ratings, he can go for it.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004211)
I've got no problem listening to him. His tears sustain me. If he wants to pull down his pants and march down Main Street for attention and ratings, he can go for it.

He may need to do that...if he stops covering Mizzou like he is threatening to do, his ratings will only be going down.

evenfall 10-18-2011 01:42 PM

Reminds me of that speech Kennedy gave about trying to put a man on the moon. Some people say, why do this, why go to the moon, why climb Everest, etc. And his response, KK, was that we chose to go to the moon not because it was easy but because it was hard. Missouri believes in their program and is not afraid to take on a massive challenge to try to be greater. Digging your feet in and throwing a fit about the way the world is won't help anyone. Missouri says, "We belong up there." The SEC seems to agree.

The shrill, small voices of naysaying can stay where they are and try to be happy with what they have as the world evolves around them.

Missouri says, so long and thanks for all the fish.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 01:46 PM

KK ripping into callers now....he is getting ready to blow.

Pants 10-18-2011 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8004232)
Reminds me of that speech Kennedy gave about trying to put a man on the moon. Some people say, why do this, why go to the moon, why climb Everest, etc. And his response, KK, was that we chose to go to the moon not because it was easy but because it was hard. Missouri believes in their program and is not afraid to take on a massive challenge to try to be greater. Digging your feet in and throwing a fit about the way the world is won't help anyone. Missouri says, "We belong up there." The SEC seems to agree.

The shrill, small voices of naysaying can stay where they are and try to be happy with what they have as the world evolves around them.

Missouri says, so long and thanks for all the fish.

You're talking about intercollegiate sports, right?

Dumbass.

DeezNutz 10-18-2011 01:47 PM

"Don't put my words in my mouth!"

evenfall 10-18-2011 01:50 PM

I had to turn it off when he was comparing this to hoping the Broncos get Luck, because then the Chiefs will be in a better division.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 01:50 PM

But KK is a big Mizzou fan according to him. He loves Mizzou!

evenfall 10-18-2011 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 8004238)
You're talking about intercollegiate sports, right?

Dumbass.

I don't see why that's inaccurate. He went on for 15 minutes about how Missouri is making a mistake because it will be hard. Well, shying away from doing things that are hard is not the attitude they have.

kstater 10-18-2011 01:52 PM

How can ANYONE listen to him?

Saul Good 10-18-2011 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8004207)
Just beating the "Missouri can't compete in the SEC" drum, starting by playing a clip from Herbstreit and saying that he didn't really mean what he said when he said Missouri would walk in around the equator of that conference, and that they could compete.

That will be the party line I guess, "you are gonna get killed over there", because its not falsifiable except over the course of years.

Its impossible to field a winning team in the SEC because all the teams are so good!

That's like saying that nobody goes to that restaurant because its too crowded to get a table.

kstater 10-18-2011 01:53 PM

OMG Did you hear what KIETZMAN just said?

evenfall 10-18-2011 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004260)
OMG Did you hear what KIETZMAN just said?

It's fun to listen to him melt down on callers like that one. Entertaining, no question about it. But he is a sideshow in the end.

Reerun_KC 10-18-2011 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8004252)
But KK is a big Mizzou fan according to him. He loves Mizzou!

NOT.

He is the lone voice of KSU Athletics department...

He is Ballsack!

track 10-18-2011 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8003732)
It's not like the local media ever spent a huge amount of time covering Texas/Texas A&M or other games far afield while still being in the conference. I am sure the coverage of the SEC would all be from an MU perspective. Keitzman just acted a fool through the whole process, swearing there was no interest in Missouri, that the big 12 is more stable, that it would be foolish, that the money really isn't better, and also, scaring fans that their school won't get media coverage. He was trying to wield whatever influence he had on the process, no doubt about that. Turns out is didn't have much, even after trying everything.

He almost seems to have been going through the Kubler/Ross grief stages over the demise of the B12.

Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance

I wonder what will be heard today. Anger? Sour grapes? This is an upgrade? Acceptance...?

Apparently you guys who are so outraged by KK's position don't understand he is a KSU guy. Of course he is going to want the Big 12 to stay together and of course he isn't going to be very interested in the SEC if MU goes there. Why would you expect him to feel any other way. I am sure most of you felt the same way about Nebraska when they left the conference ...don't be hypocrites and act like it's bad when Nebraska leaves but it's great when MU leaves.

Saulbadguy 10-18-2011 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReeTodd_KC (Post 8004283)
NOT.

He is the lone voice of KSU Athletics department...

He is Ballsack!

That...is inaccurate.

DeezNutz 10-18-2011 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by track (Post 8004292)
Apparently you guys who are so outraged by KK's position don't understand he is a KSU guy. Of course he is going to want the Big 12 to stay together and of course he isn't going to be very interested in the SEC if MU goes there. Why would you expect him to feel any other way. I am sure most of you felt the same way about Nebraska when they left the conference ...don't be hypocrites and act like it's bad when Nebraska leaves but it's great when MU leaves.

I think most intellectually honest people said that it was great for Nebraska that they left. At the time, the departures challenged the integrity of the Big XII, but the only people to blame for that are the administrators who developed and structured an unsound conference.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8004306)
I think most intellectually honest people said that it was great for Nebraska that they left. At the time, the departures challenged the integrity of the Big XII, but the only people to blame for that are the administrators who developed and structured an unsound conference.

Nebraska is a proud (junior) member if the B1G, and it was a good move for them.

Perhaps the B1G should call themselves the Big XIi in order to avoid confusion. When Nebraska is no longer a junior member, they can capitalize the second "i".

veist 10-18-2011 02:11 PM

Congratulations to Missouri on their upcoming big move to the SEC East so that Auburn doesn't get a recruiting advantage over Alabama in Florida and Georgia!

kstater 10-18-2011 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8004331)
Congratulations to Missouri on their upcoming big move to the SEC East so that Auburn doesn't get a recruiting advantage over Alabama in Florida and Georgia!

Don't worry, everyone's equal in the SEC.

veist 10-18-2011 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004335)
Don't worry, everyone's equal in the SEC.

I know, some of them are just more equal. They have to make sure that the equality is just right.

mnchiefsguy 10-18-2011 02:17 PM

KK says Mizzou will never win 10 games in a season again as long he will be on the radio if they go.....

I guess we could call it the KK curse?

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8004331)
Congratulations to Missouri on their upcoming big move to the SEC East so that Auburn doesn't get a recruiting advantage over Alabama in Florida and Georgia!

I will gladly take the recruiting advantage in Georgia and Florida.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:19 PM

Holy shit! A KSU grad and a KU grad are discussing MU, and Boal is claiming to be an objective outsider because he didn't go to a Big XII school.

Titty Meat 10-18-2011 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8004306)
I think most intellectually honest people said that it was great for Nebraska that they left. At the time, the departures challenged the integrity of the Big XII, but the only people to blame for that are the administrators who developed and structured an unsound conference.

Must on here cried like bitches and said the move was because they couldn't beat Texas.

Dayze 10-18-2011 02:23 PM

I've never heard someone so scared/angry that another team is moving to a better conference than KK.

tredadda 10-18-2011 02:27 PM

Any way to listen to his rants for someone who does not live in the KC metro area?

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:27 PM

You know its bad when te Oklahoma guy, Todd Leabo, is defending Mizzou.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8004386)
Any way to listen to his rants for someone who does not live in the KC metro area?

Just google "810 WHB" and you will get a link to streaming audio of Kietzman's streaming tears and streaming vag.

eazyb81 10-18-2011 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 8004374)
I've never heard someone so scared/angry that another team is moving to a better conference than KK.

I swear to God, KK is literally going to break down and start sobbing any minute.

This has gone beyond funny. I am seriously worried about his mental health right now. He needs to go to grief counseling.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 02:38 PM

Not only does Kietzman think Mizzou is making a bad move by going to the SEC, he thinks the Raiders made a good trade in getting Palmer. (Seriously)

Titty Meat 10-18-2011 02:42 PM

**** you guys for making me tune into this shit. When I tuned in these dumbasses were trying to justify the Palmer trade.

evenfall 10-18-2011 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReeTodd_KC (Post 8004283)
NOT.

He is the lone voice of KSU Athletics department...

He is Ballsack!

I don't think that is what he is about. He and his radio station have made a lot of money indirectly from the Big 12 being centered right around their transmitter. Now that is changing. I think he tried everything in his tacklebox to sway public opinion against the move and couldn't do it. Maybe there is a component that is reacting because this hurts his team, but it is about money for him too.

Titty Meat 10-18-2011 02:52 PM

How many times is Reetodd going to say Ballsack?

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2011 02:53 PM

Awesome radio.

Loved every second.

kstater 10-18-2011 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8004478)
I don't think that is what he is about. He and his radio station have made a lot of money indirectly from the Big 12 being centered right around their transmitter. Now that is changing. I think he tried everything in his tacklebox to sway public opinion against the move and couldn't do it. Maybe there is a component that is reacting because this hurts his team, but it is about money for him too.

You think Missouri leaving the Big 12 hurts Kansas State?

Dayze 10-18-2011 02:54 PM

what are al these "Ballsack" references.....I must have missed something.

DeezNutz 10-18-2011 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004502)
You think Missouri leaving the Big 12 hurts Kansas State?

Of course not. Four terrible universities bailing from a conference has no effect on said conference's integrity or national perception and thus has no possible effect on K-State or any other team in the league.

The SEC has an STD. /KK (What he really said: I think Missouri has fallen in love with a girl and hasn't had her tested yet.)

veist 10-18-2011 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004356)
I will gladly take the recruiting advantage in Georgia and Florida.

Yeah, except not so much. Objectively your facilities, athletics endowment etc are going to be in line with the Mississippi schools and Vandy. Unless donations somehow grow _enormously_ and sustainably that is just how its going to be too. You'll have some good years I'm sure but sustained success? I wish you luck--because I couldn't care less who wins in the SEC--but I sure wouldn't hold my breath. No hard feelings here honestly, but it sure looks like you're just going to get paid more to fill the same conference niche that you fill in the Big 12. I'm not going sit here and claim that is a bad move but lets not act like its a game changer.

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2011 02:57 PM

As long as it remains an AQ conference I'm good.

Reerun_KC 10-18-2011 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8004499)
How many times is Reetodd going to say Ballsack?


:thumb:

eazyb81 10-18-2011 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8004514)
Yeah, except not so much. Objectively your facilities, athletics endowment etc are going to be in line with the Mississippi schools and Vandy. Unless donations somehow grow _enormously_ and sustainably that is just how its going to be too. You'll have some good years I'm sure but sustained success? I wish you luck--because I couldn't care less who wins in the SEC--but I sure wouldn't hold my breath. No hard feelings here honestly, but it sure looks like you're just going to get paid more to fill the same conference niche that you fill in the Big 12. I'm not going sit here and to say that is a bad move but lets not act like its a game changer.

ROFL

WHAT A CRAAAAAAZY IDEA!

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004502)
You think Missouri leaving the Big 12 hurts Kansas State?

I think it could be a disaster. When looking at that conference realignment tool, I didn't see a single plausible scenario involving KSU going to a superconference. The most likely scenario involved Texas and Tech going to the B1G and KU going to the PAC with KSU. In other words, not likely at all. Short of that, it would require the B1G taking 2 Kansas teams.

kstater 10-18-2011 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8004510)
Of course not. Four terrible universities bailing from a conference has no effect on said conference's integrity or national perception and thus has no possible effect on K-State or any other team in the league.

The SEC has an STD. /KK (What he really said: I think Missouri has fallen in love with a girl and hasn't had her tested yet.)

I wouldn't call Nebraska terrible.

Reerun_KC 10-18-2011 03:06 PM

So when does MU make it official and when do they start playing in the SEC?

kstater 10-18-2011 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004548)
I think it could be a disaster. When looking at that conference realignment tool, I didn't see a single plausible scenario involving KSU going to a superconference. The most likely scenario involved Texas and Tech going to the B1G and KU going to the PAC with KSU. In other words, not likely at all. Short of that, it would require the B1G taking 2 Kansas teams.

You do realize 4 super conferences is just a talking head creation?

veist 10-18-2011 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8004526)
ROFL

WHAT A CRAAAAAAZY IDEA!

It sure ain't a game changer though. You're still going to have a lot more in common with Miss St, Ole Miss and Vandy than LSU, Florida and Bama.

allen_kcCard 10-18-2011 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8004576)
It sure ain't a game changer though. You're still going to have a lot more in common with Miss St, Ole Miss and Vandy than LSU, Florida and Bama.

Yup, millions of things in common with all of them, and one more with the the first three in having the bar set higher to strive for greater things.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004560)
You do realize 4 super conferences is just a talking head creation?

Yep. Its just a myth. Never mind the fact that the 4 supposed superconferences have all added teams in the past 18 months.

Never mind the fact that both of the other BCS conferences have lost members.

Never mind the fact that 4 of the remaining schools in the Big IIX just tried to bolt to the PAC.

Never mind the fact that WVU and Rutgers are actively shopping themselves to the superconferences.

Never mind the fact that the MWC and CUSA decided they had to merge into a 40 team conference in a desperate attempt to remain viable.

Those 4 conferences would hate to create a playoff that would crowd out the have-nots in order to divvy up billions amongst themselves. Its all good in the 'hood.

evenfall 10-18-2011 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004548)
I think it could be a disaster. When looking at that conference realignment tool, I didn't see a single plausible scenario involving KSU going to a superconference. The most likely scenario involved Texas and Tech going to the B1G and KU going to the PAC with KSU. In other words, not likely at all. Short of that, it would require the B1G taking 2 Kansas teams.

I doubt any disaster is pending. But you have a conference that lost two members last year, two this year, and there are two others that were actively shopping themselves to the PAC-whatever. This Big 12 isn't going to be around 5 years from now. Something probably will be. Will it have Texas or OU, will it get an automatic bid, you can't say those things for sure. You are counting on Texas and OU to still be around when they have demostrated a clear desire to leave.

I think this just leaves bystanders wondering if the Big 12 has crossed the event horizon now, but without anything to do but watch

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veist (Post 8004576)
It sure ain't a game changer though. You're still going to have a lot more in common with Miss St, Ole Miss and Vandy than LSU, Florida and Bama.

Why don't Miss, Miss St, and Vandy try to move to the Big IIX?

kstater 10-18-2011 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004601)
Yep. Its just a myth. Never mind the fact that the 4 supposed superconferences have all added teams in the past 18 months.

Never mind the fact that both of the other BCS conferences have lost members.

Never mind the fact that 4 of the remaining schools in the Big IIX just tried to bolt to the PAC.

Never mind the fact that WVU and Rutgers are actively shopping themselves to the superconferences.

Never mind the fact that the MWC and CUSA decided they had to merge into a 40 team conference in a desperate attempt to remain viable.

Those 4 conferences would hate to create a playoff that would crowd out the have-nots in order to divvy up billions amongst themselves. Its all good in the 'hood.

So, we're going to 4 conferences and Missouri is leaving because Texas is gonna go independent eventually? I have that correct?

Pac would have had their 16 if it was gonna go to 16.

There won't ever be a 4 conference playoff because of antitrust lawsuits.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 8004619)
I doubt any disaster is pending. But you have a conference that lost two members last year, two this year, and there are two others that were actively shopping themselves to the PAC-whatever. This Big 12 isn't going to be around 5 years from now. Something probably will be. Will it have Texas or OU, will it get an automatic bid, you can't say those things for sure. You are counting on Texas and OU to still be around when they have demostrated a clear desire to leave.

I think this just leaves bystanders wondering if the Big 12 has crossed the event horizon now, but without anything to do but watch

I think the SEC goes after NC State. If they get them, WVU will round out the conference. If that happens, its on. The ACC has to fill a spot (possibly 3) to replace State, and nobody decent is choosing the Big IIX over the ACC.

This thing is more likely going to happen within 18 months than not IMO.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004631)
So, we're going to 4 conferences and Missouri is leaving because Texas is gonna go independent eventually? I have that correct?

Pac would have had their 16 if it was gonna go to 16.

There won't ever be a 4 conference playoff because of antitrust lawsuits.

This entire post is fail.

Braincase 10-18-2011 03:37 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1Gn0e7kvTA

kstater 10-18-2011 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004650)
This entire post is fail.

Great rebuttal.

You've spent the entire last month saying Missouri should leave because Texas is just sticking around long enough to build the LHN and then they're gonna go independent.

So now suddenly you're saying that they're gonna belong to a superconference?

allen_kcCard 10-18-2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004655)
You've spent the entire last month saying Missouri should leave because Texas is just sticking around long enough to build the LHN and then they're gonna go independent.

So now suddenly you're saying that they're gonna belong to a superconference?

Yes, because it is impossible for that to be their intention, and at the same time impossible that they end up not being able to do so and end up having to go to a superconference instead. In both of those scenarios, MU going to the SEC is the right move if they have the opportunity.

veist 10-18-2011 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004626)
Why don't Miss, Miss St, and Vandy try to move to the Big IIX?

They're happy to be well compensated for mediocrity?

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8004655)
Great rebuttal.

You've spent the entire last month saying Missouri should leave because Texas is just sticking around long enough to build the LHN and then they're gonna go independent.

So now suddenly you're saying that they're gonna belong to a superconference?

Never mind. I didn't realize you were just making things up.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allen_kcCard (Post 8004666)
Yes, because it is impossible for that to be their intention, and at the same time impossible that they end up not being able to do so and end up having to go to a superconference instead. In both of those scenarios, MU going to the SEC is the right move if they have the opportunity.

If it goes to superconferences, the LHN will be worthless because Texas won't be able to fill a schedule. They will drop the LHN and join the PAC IMO.

allen_kcCard 10-18-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8004700)
If it goes to superconferences, the LHN will be worthless because Texas won't be able to fill a schedule. They will drop the LHN and join the PAC IMO.

Right, so whether you said it or not, both of the things he said that you said are theoretically correct.

Saul Good 10-18-2011 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allen_kcCard (Post 8004703)
Right, so whether you said it or not, both of the things he said that you said are theoretically correct.

I agree, just expanding on the point.

The anti-trust thing is dumb as well. There are already multiple divisions in football. There is no reason that 64 (more likely 60 or 62) teams can't form their own division. Hell, they could tell the NCAA to **** right off if they really wanted. I don't think they would, and I think there would still be bowl games in addition to the playoff, but I see no major hurdles that couldn't be overcome. We are talking about massive institutions with tremendous pull within their respective states. What politician is going to stand in their way when every state with a major football program is represented?

LiveSteam 10-18-2011 04:18 PM

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT ALREADY MISSOURI!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.