ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Rashee Rice Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348549)

saphojunkie 05-23-2023 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955651)
My point is that while it's true that Rodgers struggled without Adams and Pat didn't struggle nearly as much without Tyreek, the truth is that Tyreek was never Pat's actual 1. Travis was.

Meanwhile, Rodgers true 1 was in fact D. Adams. Adams=Travis. Not Adams=Tyreek.


to make it more apples to apples, Pat would have to play a season without Travis, not Tyreek.

this is absolutely true, and the biggest reason why everyone saying we need a superstar receiver is missing the big picture.

Megatron96 05-23-2023 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16955688)
this is absolutely true, and the biggest reason why everyone saying we need a superstar receiver is missing the big picture.

We don't 'need' a superstar WR. We need a solid possession vet WR, imo. I've consistently said this, but my words get twisted around every time. But I consistently said that we need/should get a Adam Thielen type, or a Corey Davis, more recently. Basically a better version of JJSS.



Anyway, we need a guy like that to force the defense to make some decisions about how they're going to defend us.

Midway through 2022, JJSS basically became invisible because defenses began paying a lot more man/press vs. KC, and JJSS couldn't beat his DBs. Neither could Skyy or anyone else for that matter. It became something of an issue until Andy started scheming plays for McKinnon more.

But that's a band aid, not a long-term solution.

ReynardMuldrake 05-23-2023 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955651)
My point is that while it's true that Rodgers struggled without Adams and Pat didn't struggle nearly as much without Tyreek, the truth is that Tyreek was never Pat's actual 1. Travis was.

Meanwhile, Rodgers true 1 was in fact D. Adams. Adams=Travis. Not Adams=Tyreek.


to make it more apples to apples, Pat would have to play a season without Travis, not Tyreek.

But the tweet never calls Tyreek his #1. That's a strawman.

Megatron96 05-23-2023 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReynardMuldrake (Post 16955816)
But the tweet never calls Tyreek his #1. That's a strawman.



I think we can safely infer that, considering the first part of the tweet. The tweeter is being obtuse, in order to make his point.

Chris Meck 05-23-2023 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955711)
We don't 'need' a superstar WR. We need a solid possession vet WR, imo. I've consistently said this, but my words get twisted around every time. But I consistently said that we need/should get a Adam Thielen type, or a Corey Davis, more recently. Basically a better version of JJSS.



Anyway, we need a guy like that to force the defense to make some decisions about how they're going to defend us.

Midway through 2022, JJSS basically became invisible because defenses began paying a lot more man/press vs. KC, and JJSS couldn't beat his DBs. Neither could Skyy or anyone else for that matter. It became something of an issue until Andy started scheming plays for McKinnon more. .



But that's a band aid, not a long-term solution.

Andy didn't really 'scheme' up Mckinnon, he's usually the outlet pass, and that's been there for YEARS. Pat just started taking it more often rather than forcing the downfield play.

It's not a scheme change. Occasionally there would be something drawn up, but mostly it was just the outlet pass.

Megatron96 05-23-2023 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16955859)
Andy didn't really 'scheme' up Mckinnon, he's usually the outlet pass, and that's been there for YEARS. Pat just started taking it more often rather than forcing the downfield play.

It's not a scheme change. Occasionally there would be something drawn up, but mostly it was just the outlet pass.

Eh, there were more screens installed, McKinnon actually began running WR routes, like that skinny post vs. HOU (I think it was HOU).

Regardless at this point, JJSS stopped being as effective as he was in the first half of the season, and McKinnon became the consistent option instead.

And we know this is true, because JJSS' projection at about the 8 week mark was to exceed 1,200 yards and 4-5 TDs, but he went from averaging about 60 yds/gm to about 30.

And McKinnon wasn't on pace for 512 yards receiving/10 TDs through about the same number of weeks. His production increased about when JJSS decreased. And we didn't see a big jump in anyone else's numbers. McKinnon effectively was schemed to replace JJSS lack of production.


Okay well, the stats and the timeline seem to imply that. Obviously, I don't know exactly what Andy's real thoughts were.

Chris Meck 05-23-2023 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955869)
Eh, there were more screens installed, McKinnon actually began running WR routes, like that skinny post vs. HOU (I think it was HOU).

Regardless at this point, JJSS stopped being as effective as he was in the first half of the season, and McKinnon became the consistent option instead.

And we know this is true, because JJSS' projection at about the 8 week mark was to exceed 1,200 yards and 4-5 TDs, but he went from averaging about 60 yds/gm to about 30.

And McKinnon wasn't on pace for 512 yards receiving/10 TDs through about the same number of weeks. His production increased about when JJSS decreased. And we didn't see a big jump in anyone else's numbers. McKinnon effectively was schemed to replace JJSS lack of production.


Okay well, the stats and the timeline seem to imply that. Obviously, I don't know exactly what Andy's real thoughts were.

Again, I think it's reasonable to figure the knee was a problem. But there's no reason to think McKinnon won't still be a useful weapon.

Megatron96 05-23-2023 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16955988)
Again, I think it's reasonable to figure the knee was a problem. But there's no reason to think McKinnon won't still be a useful weapon.

Oh, I think McKinnon will still be effective. I just don't think we should reasonably expect him to post the same or greater numbers, that's all. Looking at his career numbers receiving, it's reasonable to expect a small drop overall, closer to his career average, that's all.

That said, we're probably going to need some other player to make some kind of jump to make that up.

Chris Meck 05-23-2023 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955997)
Oh, I think McKinnon will still be effective. I just don't think we should reasonably expect him to post the same or greater numbers, that's all. Looking at his career numbers receiving, it's reasonable to expect a small drop overall, closer to his career average, that's all.

That said, we're probably going to need some other player to make some kind of jump to make that up.

Well, yeah. Of course. Why wouldn't we?

Couch-Potato 05-23-2023 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16955471)
Somewhat misleading, in that Mahomes' number 1 receiver wasn't Tyreek, it was Travis. Take Kelce away, and Mahomes might not do as well. I doubt he'd have as large a drop-off as what happened with Rodgers, but Pat also has other advantages that Rodgers didn't have last season. Like Andy. And youth.

Really solid argument for our unwillingness to pay any other weapon more than Travis.

Megatron96 05-23-2023 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 16956074)
Really solid argument for our unwillingness to pay any other weapon more than Travis.



Well, except for the fact that Travis is 34 this year. Might want to replace that production in the near future. Before he actually declines. Just a thought.

ForeverIowan 05-23-2023 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16956082)
Well, except for the fact that Travis is 34 this year. Might want to replace that production in the near future. Before he actually declines. Just a thought.

They are trying. In the last two years theyve drafted two 2nd round receivers and traded for a former 1st rounder. Veach could give up 3 future 1st rounders for Marvin Harrison Jr next year and some ppl would still claim we arent doing enough to address receiver.

saphojunkie 05-23-2023 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverIowan (Post 16956127)
They are trying. In the last two years theyve drafted two 2nd round receivers and traded for a former 1st rounder. Veach could give up 3 future 1st rounders for Marvin Harrison Jr next year and some ppl would still claim we arent doing enough to address receiver.

not counting Mecole in the second.

If one of those guys was DK Metcalf, Terry MacLaurin, or Tee Higgins, this isn't a conversation. If you want to critique the FO's ability to scout WR talent after round one, then fine. But the efforts have been made, and the results have been two Lombardi trophies.

duncan_idaho 05-24-2023 07:38 AM

Moore didn’t really get big snap counts in the part of the season we’re talking about, save for the Chargers game, where he had multiple big catches on third down, including one where he made Derwin James look foolish.

He definitely had more chops vs man than done so far, but I think he can/will develop better feel for that.

I think Rice complements him well in that regard. He shows a good feel for working vs zone in his highlights, and Keysor’s film review showed that, too, if I recall correctly.

If your top 3 pass catchers feature one guy who is great against zone and man, one guy who has a good feel in zone, and one guy who can win vs man consistently, I think you’re in pretty fantastic shape.

Kiimo 05-31-2023 04:00 PM

https://i.imgur.com/xx9slxw.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.