ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Brock 05-17-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6762939)
Don't respond. Honestly, if it is down to that being their angle, you've already won the argument. KU fan can't comprehend a school making a decision based in large part on academics and it isn't difficult to understand why.

Elaborate.

DeezNutz 05-17-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6762939)
Don't respond. Honestly, if it is down to that being their angle, you've already won the argument. KU fan can't comprehend a school making a decision based in large part on academics and it isn't difficult to understand why.

Which is why the move couldn't be more exciting. It's tremendous for past graduates and current and future students.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-17-2010 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 6762626)
Well, if you can't beat 'em, join a different conference. At least you'll get paid more to be a sparring partner.

ROFL We've beat your ass plenty, Padawan.

Move along people; nothing to see here.

Brock 05-17-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 6763033)
ROFL We've beat your ass plenty, Padawan.
.

Well, sure. Almost exactly the same number of times we've beat your ass.

Mr. Kotter 05-17-2010 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6762939)
Don't respond. Honestly, if it is down to that being their angle, you've already won the argument. KU fan can't comprehend a school making a decision based in large part on academics and it isn't difficult to understand why.

:spock:

Still not seeing your being a jerk about the KU stuff, right? Of course, that's part of the rationalization those considering the move would offer...doesn't necessarily make it true those, does it???

Heh.

kepp 05-17-2010 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 6763081)
:spock:

Still not seeing your being a jerk about the KU stuff, right? Of course, that's part of the rationalization those considering the move would offer...doesn't necessarily make it true those, does it???

Heh.

So you really think that the decision to change conferences (if invited, of course) would be left to the athletic department for the most part?

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-17-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6763056)
Well, sure. Almost exactly the same number of times we've beat your ass.

Exactly. It's a dumb take.

AustinChief 05-17-2010 01:23 PM

If they both leave, I could see OSU and OU moving to the north division and UH and TCU being invited to join the south. That would actually work out well for everyone... not a HUGE talent dropoff and both have solid academics

Titty Meat 05-17-2010 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6763156)
If they both leave, I could see OSU and OU moving to the north division and UH and TCU being invited to join the south. That would actually work out well for everyone... not a HUGE talent dropoff and both have solid academics

No way they move OU to the North that would mean no more Texas OU game every year. Nebraska alone probably brings in more revenue then both UH and TCU.

duncan_idaho 05-17-2010 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6763156)
If they both leave, I could see OSU and OU moving to the north division and UH and TCU being invited to join the south. That would actually work out well for everyone... not a HUGE talent dropoff and both have solid academics

Only issue with that is that it even further weakens the Big 12's ability to negotiate a new TV deal. Adding more Texas schools doesn't improve the conference's ability to deliver TV sets.

The Big 12 would have to add new markets to survive, or partner extremely closely with the Pac-10. Or both.

I think the most likely thing is the Big 12 dies as its pieces are bitten off by conferences with competant leadership.

kepp 05-17-2010 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6763275)
Only issue with that is that it even further weakens the Big 12's ability to negotiate a new TV deal. Adding more Texas schools doesn't improve the conference's ability to deliver TV sets.

The Big 12 would have to add new markets to survive, or partner extremely closely with the Pac-10. Or both.

I think the most likely thing is the Big 12 dies as its pieces are bitten off by conferences with competant leadership.

Yep...as much as they hate to admit it, losing MU would be very difficult to overcome in terms of negotiating a new TV contract.

Reaper16 05-17-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6763211)
No way they move OU to the North that would mean no more Texas OU game every year.

There would still be an annual Texas vs OU game. It would be played at Reliant Stadium or Texas Stadium and would be called the Big XII Championship Game.

Titty Meat 05-17-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6763319)
There would still be an annual Texas vs OU game. It would be played at Reliant Stadium or Texas Stadium and would be called the Big XII Championship Game.

Touche

HemiEd 05-17-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 6762626)
Well, if you can't beat 'em, join a different conference. At least you'll get paid more to be a sparring partner.

That is pretty much how I see it for Missouri.

But the Nebraska issue is different, they will be missed, and they have won something numerous times. The glory days are fading in people's memories, but they were one of the top programs for many years.

Mr. Kotter 05-17-2010 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6763089)
So you really think that the decision to change conferences (if invited, of course) would be left to the athletic department for the most part?


No, but it's driven more by money than anything else. It's just transparent and lame then to rationalize it further by adding...'oh, yeah; we like the academics too' when the difference isn't nearly that big of a deal.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.