ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Stewie 09-09-2011 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7890794)
Not giving you shit here, I honestly don't follow. What is redundancy in college regions and how is the solving of said issue (if it is an issue) related to enrollment size?

From what I see there are several "little sisters" in conferences that add nothing. "It's just always been that way."

If we want a true 64, then lets go with the true 64.

kstater 09-09-2011 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7890796)
Pure Gold Jerry... Pure Gold!!!!

Tell me the truth, this is you isn't it?

Quote:

Me and 90% of Jayhawk nation want to absolutely see KU split away from ksu. We've shared recruits, state funding, and fan support with you long enough. Its time to be the only featured school in a small state that only needs one AQ school. ksu brings nothing, I repeat NOTHING that you don't already recieve with KU. KU brings the KC market and the rest of Kansas by itself.. KSU is not needed for anything but the Sun Belt Conference.

kstater 09-09-2011 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7890799)
From what I see there are several "little sisters" in conferences that add nothing. "It's just always been that way."

If we want a true 64, then lets go with the true 64.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7890800)
Tell me the truth, this is you isn't it?

LMAO

vailpass 09-09-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7890799)
From what I see there are several "little sisters" in conferences that add nothing. "It's just always been that way."

If we want a true 64, then lets go with the true 64.

Got it, thanks.

Reaper16 09-09-2011 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7890790)
Is MO ST a D1 school in football?

Yes, of course they are. You know they are D1 in basketball, which means they are D1 in everything.

Of course, D1 doesn't mean what it used to. Mo St. football is an FCS team, not an FBS one.

RustShack 09-11-2011 09:41 AM

Some ISU love by Texas http://www.shaggybevo.com/board/show...-State-v.-Iowa

Brianfo 09-11-2011 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 7894915)

That was one of the greatest college football games I have ever seen. Jantz looks to be the real deal.

RustShack 09-11-2011 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brianfo (Post 7894933)
That was one of the greatest college football games I have ever seen. Jantz looks to be the real deal.

I hated it. I was having a heart attack the whole fourth quarter and overtimes until that field goal. I knew it was over with the Man of Steele at the helm!

RustShack 09-11-2011 09:54 AM

Last ISU game I went to went into triple overtime also, but the didn't pull that one out even though the guy was wide open and we should have won.

vailpass 09-11-2011 09:54 AM

Clones always go way over their heads when they play the Hawks then revert to their lackluster selves for the rest of the year. Nothing new or unexpected here. We'll see how the rest of the season plays out.

RustShack 09-11-2011 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7894943)
Cones always go way over their heads when they play the Hawks then revert to their lackluster selves for the rest of the year. Nothing new or unexpected here. We'll see how the rest of the season plays out.

You are thinking of the Dan McCarney era. Rhoads cares more about conference games than Iowa. I can just as easily say the last few years Iowa has cared more about the ISU game because that was their best game they played, where as ISU looked bad but looked pretty good the rest of the year in conference play.

vailpass 09-11-2011 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 7894947)
You are thinking of the Dan McCarney era. Rhoads cares more about conference games than Iowa. I can just as easily say the last few years Iowa has cared more about the ISU game because that was their best game they played, where as ISU looked bad but looked pretty good the rest of the year in conference play.

I must have missed all those bowls ISU played in over the last few years. Your post is idiotic and reeks of Ames.

RustShack 09-11-2011 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7894957)
I must have missed all those bowls ISU played in over the last few years. Your post is idiotic and reeks of Ames.

If ISU had Iowas schedule they would have easily been in a bowl game last year. Shit they should have with ISU's harder schedule they just missed out in triple OT against Nebraska that would have put them in one. Fell apart against Colorado the next week after that and then lost to Mizzou 0-14 without our starting QB.

vailpass 09-11-2011 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 7894959)
If ISU had Iowas schedule they would have easily been in a bowl game last year.

LMAO ISU, the ugly step sister.

RustShack 09-11-2011 01:22 PM

Geoffroy: "we are waiting for Oklahoma to make a decision at this point". Did not seem too concerned about the situation, although he obviously doesn't like to discuss matters like this while watching our football games. Also mentioned Dodds & Texas and equal revenue sharing within the conference, sounded like that could in fact be a distinct possibility.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.