Did someone seriously say Bosa



If we're posting pipe dreams let's get AJ Brown everyone

In fairness...he said call them up and see what they want. Plus it was O.City and he wants to trade for everyone.

sounds like Veach is just doing due diligence. Calling around to see whats available and what it would take to get them.

Goddamnit!

I logged in this morning just to say, "herp derp i think the Chiefs are going to trade for a young "vet" receiver."

Welp, there went my ****ing shine LMAO

I think they've pivoted and are just seeing what options they have. Someone is willing to do some trade, they'll do it.

Like last year with Williams. When one door closes another opens. Pivot and move on.

Everyone has a price.

Would you have said Tyreek would be a Dolphin a month ago?

Hell nah.

We're talking about Bart mother****ing Beach. Dude swings for the fences. I'm team Shenault too, but i think the Chiefs are thinking bigger. A true #1.

Honestly....It very well could be DK.

I don't think it is. Look at what he's done so far in FA. None of that shit has been swinging for the fences. Veach two years ago? Sure. Now? I don't think so.

I think he's changed to a team that has a ton of depth. A team that's good across the board instead of two all world players on each side of the ball and then trash because of it.

Yep.

I agree with you.

But if there's something that Veach is excellent at, it's making a great trade out of nowhere and shocking the living **** out of all of us.

As Somerset said in Se7en: If John Doe's head splits open and a UFO should fly out, I want you to have expected it.

If he did it...I wouldn't be surprised.

I'm just hard pressed to see them trading for DK at this point.

Can someone with more knowledge tell me what is stopping the Chiefs from picking up Calvin Ridley now and put him on ice

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sources: Giants, Chiefs still actively discussing potential James Bradberry trade, Brian Daboll calls it a &quot;fluid situation&quot; <a href="https://twitter.com/PFN365?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PFN365</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> <a href="https://t.co/BwyCmxZAx0">https://t.co/BwyCmxZAx0</a></p>&mdash; Aaron Wilson (@AaronWilson_NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronWilson_NFL/status/1508832752329793540?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"The Chiefs are extremely interested in a potential trade for Bradberry. Compensation discussions have ranged from a late-round selection going to New York in a possible deal to swapping picks in the middle rounds, according to league sources not authorized to speak publicly.

Kansas City would likely try to sign Bradberry to a long-term contract extension if they acquire him, a league source predicted."

Good. Bradberry would be such a good get for us

Nah, i don't believe you. I'm looking at the moves he's done, and based on his history, he's still after his cornerstone piece. Orlando Brown to finish off his rebuilt OL, so to speak.

We know he was willing to pay $21M+ a season on a star WR. Just not $30M. So i'm not buying that they're avoiding a guy they have to pay.

What i WILL buy though, is that they're willing to trade for a young star player that they can kick the contract down the road for a season or two.

The Chiefs can afford a #1, they just couldn't afford Tyreek.

After spending the last week reviewing receivers, i've come to the conclusion that the guys they like won't be there, much like the OT situation last season. As you've said, they're much more likely to target a guy on day two. But day two guys aren't your #1. ONE of those 1sts will be used to secure a DE. The other will be used to secure a WR.

And since Veach is missing his cornerstone for his WR room, and since no blue chippers will be available when they pick, i think they flip that 1st for a cornerstone WR to round off that room.

As far as Shenault goes, he doesn't fit the bill. I think once they signed MVS, our room of #2'/3's just became too crowded.

The only guy I'm willing to trade for at this point is McLaurin in your scenario. I don't want Metcalf.

AJ Brown.

I'm not. I think it makes perfect sense.

1. Does Seattle really want to pay a top WR despite having no Qb and rebuilding?

2. Carrol is Mr. Run 1st. I bet he's apt to trading away a player like DK more so than other coaches would be.

3. From a football perspective it's not hard to see how DK would fit in here. Could DK possibly be an even BETTER match for Mahomes than Tyreek? It's something to seriously consider.

The Titans are not trading AJ Brown to the Chiefs. And if they did....you'd be looking at giving up basically everything you got from the Hill trade.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/s239QJIh56sRW" width="480" height="259" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/everyone-remake-rw-s239QJIh56sRW"

They're gonna have to blow up the thing anyway cause Tannehill sucks and they know it now.

The cost in both draft picks and money. I think you'd get better value for a guy like McLaurin. That's just my personal preference.

That would be solid.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Highest average WR depth 2 seconds after snap when running a vertical route and not facing press coverage.<br><br>Via NFL Next Gen Stats! <a href="https://t.co/OZm7ENk2pE">pic.twitter.com/OZm7ENk2pE</a></p>&mdash; Seth Walder (@SethWalder) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethWalder/status/1507049428049346566?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Go get Scary Terry (bitch!) then.

Just because I had him in fantasy I'd love to try and get KJ Osborn from the Vikings.

That guy has talent but doesn't get enough snaps behind Jefferson and Thielen

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Give us Bradberry for a 2023 conditional 6th and I’ll be sure to get Terry McLaurin out of your division” -Brett Veach probably <a href="https://t.co/kOfaAvvVql">https://t.co/kOfaAvvVql</a></p>&mdash; Arrowhead Live (@ArrowheadLive) <a href="https://twitter.com/ArrowheadLive/status/1508834238564601857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I like McLaurin too. I just think that Big Balls Brett will swing big.

And i also think Carrol is trying to distance himself from the passing game like it's covid.

Seattle may be willing to part with DK more than the Commies are willing to part with McLaurin.

And i also think DK would brings some more size and physicality that Mahomes hasn't really had in his WR's.

McLaurin is 6' and 210 lbs. He isn't small. He's no Metcalf but still.

And Washington signed Curtis Samuel last year and then drafted Dyami Brown. They could see the writing on the wall that McLaurin isn't going to be there long term. Yeah they could keep him around to help out with Wentz....or they could trade him away and get a rookie WR in this years draft. They'd have the same time to grow a connection.

McLaurin
Juju
MVS
Hardman
A 3rd-4th round rookie

Now THAT is a WR room that has depth.

If we somehow landed both Bradberry and McLaurin, are we already as least as good at every position on the team as last year? And that’s BEFORE the draft.

Maybe slightly worse on the DL without Ingram, but wouldn’t we still be able to grab him or someone similar on another 1-year deal?

That would be fun!

Kinda ironic that in trading Hill, KC will have basically countered the two deep shell defenses that frustrated the shit out of us.

Yup, i can see that happening too.

And they could take a WR at #11 to do it.

Regardless of who it is, i firmly believe the Chiefs will be trading for a WR that's on his rookie contract.

I'd rather have a DE in that situation.

Did Chris Jones just restructure/sign an extension?


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I&#39;m here for life</p>&mdash; Chris Jones (@StoneColdJones) <a href="https://twitter.com/StoneColdJones/status/1508840955495043084?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Did we just extend Chris Jones or something?

I think they'll be throwing a lot of draft capital at the DL.

Could see that. Go young and draft heavy on D, trade for offense. Makes some sense.

Or he had heard a bunch of talk after Hill got traded and just wanted to calm fans down.

Who the **** knows really.

Mahomes replied almost instantly. Very weird.

As they should. This DE group is deep in the top 3-4 rounds. Get a DT and a couple of DEs out of it.

It would be an extension over a restructure....I would think. Unless they restructured and added some void years onto the back end to lower his cap hits.

Extend Jones to a few years to make that contract easier to deal with would be great. Otherwise he's gone next offseason along with Clark.

It's kind of weird timing. And adding Mahomes response....and Nate Taylor retweeting it.

The Mahomes response within seconds has me thinking this is legit.

Like 15 just happened to be sitting on his phone scrolling Twitter and got a notification?

Didn't know Nate RT'd.

Yeah. I believe he RT'd it as soon as it was posted.

Could be nothing but who the **** knows anymore. Maybe they extend him to lower his cap hit this year and next.

I could see Lockett being the guy they get

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Love you KC.</p>&mdash; Chris Jones (@StoneColdJones) <a href="https://twitter.com/StoneColdJones/status/1508840502094872588?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Lockett or Cooks would be a huge steal for us

No thanks on Cooks

Cooks is going to be 29 and has had like eleventy-billion concussions.

Pass.

If you're going to trade for a guy who you believe is going to be here for the future....then you get a guy like McLaurin...or Metcalf. You don't trade a pick for a guy like Cooks or Lockett.

If Jones agreed to move money forward, you have to think some kind of trade or signing is upcoming. So many avenues they can take it's hard to predict what Veach has up his sleeve.

I think they are probably looking for a 2 year band aid until the guys they draft this year are ready to go full speed ahead. But yeah...McLaurin would be ideal for a long term investment.

Cooks has missed 4 games the last 5 years and has been a 1k receiver in 6 of the last 7 seasons.

How could you not want that for cheap? Pretty sure he’s $13 million this year

Mclaurin is THE most under rated WR in the league. Playing with below average QBs and just produces!

I would give up 50 for him in a heart beat but would hope its 62. Proven studs are better than lottery tickets.

The nice thing about Cooks is that everyone slots in better as he instantly not only is WR #1 but can make teams pay attention to him..allowing JuJu and MVS to do more damage.

Good luck though. I could see a team trading a wr kon a rookie contract but de is more valued.

Yea, they have enough short term answers at WR. If they trade for another, it’s a long term solution.

Cooks for like a 3rd wouldn't be awful. Not great but whatever.

Terry not only runs great routes but he is ridiculously explosive.

He should have way more TD's than he does but he usually has no one throwing to him when he breaks wide open.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/washingt...claurin-29112/

This is the final year of his rookie deal and a 26 year old WR doing well at his prime, it's going to cost you picks and a nice fat contract.

Trade Tyreek bc he wants too much.
Get draft picks.
Give up high draft pick(s?) for Metcalf
Metcalf wants to be highest paid WR next Spring

What are we doing here?

You answered part of your own question.

These arguments are not without merit but I don't trust someone his size, his age, and with his concussion history.

I've gone on record against trading for Metcalf. I think McLaurin would be cheaper and cost less when it comes to draft picks.

Metcalf isn't getting $30M.

And if he told Seattle he was expecting that type of money, he'd already have been traded.

I'd rather the Chiefs aggressively use their draft capital to trade up in the first round and draft one of those stud WR's... there are like SIX WR's projected to go in the first round of the draft.

The only other veteran WR free agent I think the Chiefs should add is someone to help provide depth that is cheap... someone like a Sammy Watkins.

We are doing nothing but dreaming and speculating on things that are probably <10% probability.

Veach is kicking ALL tires as he should be doing as a GM.

Reports are reporting.

That's all.

One of these WR's going early will end up being really good. Maybe 2. Which ones? Who knows.

I don't think the Chiefs should trade the capitol to go up and get one.

Yep.

Does not fit the Chiefs Way.

Too old, too much mileage. He'll be 29 when the season starts, which, for the Chiefs, is old.

And everyone is looking at guys like Metcalf....but that's not what the report said.

DK would be awesome but it makes NO SENSE. After trading Tyreek away we would have to give up the picks we got for him. After playing a season with Mahomes, DK would probably get MORE money than Tyreek.

This is why Franchise is saying no and everyone has to see this.

Exactly.

Go take a look at WR draft history in R1 and see how many were actually worth it.

Hint: Not many.

Probably for Bradberry I’d assume.

If the Chiefs stay put and draft a WR with one of those 1sts, i'm reaaaally starting to warm up to Christian Watson. That dude is freaky.

You spelled Treylon Burks wrong.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahawks</a> HC Pete Carroll said the team “intends” for DK Metcalf to be with them next season. <br><br>Carroll used the same word to describe Russell Wilson’s future at the Combine. <br><br>Metcalf is entering the final year of his contract and the WR market has ���� in the last couple weeks.</p>&mdash; Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1508783471900123146?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>