Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoon View Post
Ours fled like an idiot.

You don't need direct proof to get beyond a reasonable doubt.

If the video shows you leaving with a smoking gun and there is a bullet ridden body, I don't need a video of you firing the trigger.

If a driver leaves the scene and I'm on the jury, I'm going to be very easy to convince beyond a reasonable doubt that they were DUI.

Don't like it. Don't leave the scene.

Or kick me off the jury.

And the NFL certainly doesn't require reasonable doubt.

Although I'm making no predictions on what they are going to do.

It's from a legal source in Texas.

But you are all too immature to handle that because of the messengers.

If you'd like to see the source talking on camera, he was on Lance's podcast last week.

HE'S A ****ING LAWYER

I did it for a very good reason. You morons can't handle anything from Twidwell. Despite the fact it didn't really come from him.

In both the United States and Canada, jurors having conscientious objection to service are generally excused from service. This chiefly includes religious groups such as the Amish, Conservative Mennonites, Old Order Mennonites and Chiefsplanet lawyers

Chiefs WR depth chart week 1:

1. H.Brown
2. J.Shit
3. Nobody

What about:

1. Skyy Less
2. Drops Toney
3. J Wut

Eh???

I did a quick search of the phrase "gossipy bitch" in Merriam Webster's dictionary and next to it there was a small illustrative icon that resembles Florio's face.

H Brown
Marcus Kemp
?

Precedence really doesn't mean shit when the Personal Conduct Policy changes every year.

Come on now. The NFL has been a model of fairness and consistancy for years when it comes to punishment suspensions. lol

If they arrested every NFL guy that went 119 there would be no one in the league lulz

He's a cuck, trust us, don't click the video, that's what he wants.

If Rice were on another contender, it would be interesting to read the feedback.

I didn't get the memo we were panicking already. :hmmm:

You apparently stand him enough to watch him... just sayin'. :shrug:

Our WR suck thread 2024 edition incoming by someone...

Oh wow

The argument wasn't about impossibility but why make things harder on yourself?

Same holds true this year. Sure, we can win making Mahomes a game manager, running the ball, and playing defense but just adding one or two guys that can catch and the offense elite allows us to crush teams instead of holding on and waiting for a mistake to win by a FG.

We also won 2 SB's without going 16 straight drives in playoff games without a TD.


Winning with defense and mediocre offense in today's NFL gives you less room for error.

We cut this sack of shit yet?

FOUR.

We're about to win FOUR super bowls in a row.

I'd only panic if I fapped myself dry...

Didn't know that Florio was an attorney. Makes his commentary more interesting. I guess we'll see how good of an attorney he once was as things unfold.

The idea though that there won't be a plea deal because Rice already admitted to driving one of the cars and the existence of the video is concerning.


Going to be an interesting next few months.

Similar to Sunny Hostin… not exactly a high bar to become an attorney.

Well, you still have to graduate law school and pass the bar. That's a pretty high bar.

If the likes of Mike Florio and Sunny Hostin can do it…

I get it, there's plenty f dumb lawyers.

But my brother is an attorney, one of the smartest people I've ever known, and he said it wasn't easy.

book smart is different than common sense and street smart. Florio is a dumb ****er on the latter...

Florio can't tell people he's really Patrick's father, like he can Josh & Lamar

I think it's cute of you, as grown woman, to umbrella out your pencil skirt to provide uterine defilade for yourself and the CP army of candy asses that lamented the loss of the season after the first game.

The truth is, that thread was started by a screaming hormonal Karen, was constantly updated by the army of Karen's who declared the players "Utter human shit", and that Mahomes should "march into veach's office and DeMaNd better players and that the Chiefs "wasted a season of prime Mahomes".

Now, I do believe that you, in a moment of clarity, probably enlightened by your HRT, did make the point that the Chiefs were making it more difficult than it had to be.

So, I hope you and the ladies bridge club have a fine Saturday evening.

It doesn't mean anything

I think it is cute that you are reeruned and have no ability or capacity for reading comprehension.

This thread seems to be going well

I've heard people call Florio out whenever he references law, saying he hasn't practiced it in quite awhile and isn't up to snuff on some of the things he's preaching.

You should strive to be better than 88, no matter what Dunning Kruger has to say about it.

Completely irrelevant to the thread or to my response to you but congratulations, you got a word in Reddit Mad Libs.

AI bot could do what you just did with minimal effort.

Maybe. We'll see.

But I think most of us kind of thought this wouldn't go to trial; that it would be pled down and that ultimately it would be negotiated between Rice's lawyer the prosecutors and the judge. And maybe that still happens somehow.

But if it goes to trial. In Dallas. In front of a jury of Dallas jurors, and the prosecution decides to really be aggressive about sticking Rice with something, well, I don't think that jury is going to be as lenient, that's all.

Well, I could have spent paragraphs explaining how far off reality "making things harder than they had to be" was last year and how much further off it is this year, but you've never seemed receptive to debate.... just mashing your keyboard telling people your reality as you see it over and over.

So, we're left with laughing at you while you and 88 are left with calling intelligent people reeruns over and over. That's literally all you two do, post dumb stuff from Twitter and then call people reeruns.

I personally think you're at least slightly better than that, but I guess that's for you to prove right (as I said, you should strive for better).

Yet, if you can't objectively say someone such as WTI is one of the more/most intelligent people here, regardless of how much or little you agree with what he says... then that's of course where DK comes in.

Be smarter or do better.... or don't, I guess. :shrug:

Like masterbating with a cheese grater

I don't think winning with a top three defense is a sustainable strategy. I don't like making Mahomes play hero ball with crappy WR's and an aging Kelce is ideal.

But it's not like anybody promised us a three peat.

You don't even understand the findings of DK and how they apply IRL. You are using the word and concept incorrectly.


I would ask you to be smarter but that would require you to actually understand the concept you are promoting.

I have stated there are different ways to win.

You can with with a defensive build, a balanced build, or an offensive build.

I think Veach has been leaning to a defensive/balanced concept but has hit on so many more defensive players that the results are a a defensive build.

Would love to see an offense focused draft.

All that emotion. Settle down, Queen. Try some Mother's Little Helper to take the edge off.

12/28/23

Yea, the thread was all about making it harder on themselves. Face it, chica, you laid face down, ass up in that thread.

So you are an old man yelling at the clouds and you are mad at me because another poster said something one time?


Cool cool.


Originally Posted by Hazel

their QB has a cap hit of $57 million next year

Have no idea what point you are trying to make here. This isn't me.

This really has become boy band, teen age discussion.

Surejan.gif

Don't change the subject. (although it's what women do and betas with pronouns, but just try not to do that).

And some of us, the rational, logical thinkers, said, sit tight. They'll hit their stride when it counts. But you and you're shriveled up thyroid couldn't listen to the men. Instead you screeched.

YOU changed the subject first.


So if that hurts your feelings then it's on you.

As I said, try responding to the posts in the thread next time rather than random words that hurt your feelings months ago. Your response to my post was nonsensical gibberish.

It was. But in your emotional state, I'm not surprised to find you're suddenly dealing with a little amnesia.

You did it first

LMAO

Didn't care or bother to read it, especially because the poster name wasn't mine.


If you are still upset at something I said months ago completely unrelated to this thread you are welcome to start a callout thread.


;)

Here you go.

What I said:

The argument wasn't about impossibility but why make things harder on yourself?

Same holds true this year. Sure, we can win making Mahomes a game manager, running the ball, and playing defense but just adding one or two guys that can catch and the offense elite allows us to crush teams instead of holding on and waiting for a mistake to win by a FG.

We also won 2 SB's without going 16 straight drives in playoff games without a TD.


Winning with defense and mediocre offense in today's NFL gives you less room for error.
__________________
Emotional angry change of subject and callout for posts unrelated that made you sad months ago.



I think it's cute of you, as grown woman, to umbrella out your pencil skirt to provide uterine defilade for yourself and the CP army of candy asses that lamented the loss of the season after the first game.

The truth is, that thread was started by a screaming hormonal Karen, was constantly updated by the army of Karen's who declared the players "Utter human shit", and that Mahomes should "march into veach's office and DeMaNd better players and that the Chiefs "wasted a season of prime Mahomes".

Now, I do believe that you, in a moment of clarity, probably enlightened by your HRT, did make the point that the Chiefs were making it more difficult than it had to be.

So, I hope you and the ladies bridge club have a fine Saturday evening.



I realize that you don't understand what "changing the subject" means so I just left this here for others to see what you did.


Later.

<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="14308426" data-share-method="host" data-aspect-ratio="1.78" data-width="50%"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/tell-me-more-michael-scott-the-office-gif-14308426">Tell Me More Michael Scott GIF</a>from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/tell+me+more-gifs">Tell Me More GIFs</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

Lol, you're a freaking clairvoyant, sir. Please send me the lotto numbers for powerball next week. Daddy needs a new bag . . .

You used the concept incorrectly.

If you want to understand what Dunning-Kruger is and how it applies you will actually have to learn on your own.


It does NOT mean if someone thinks someone is stupid then the person who thinks the other is stupid is stupid and the other is smart.

That's why I said you must have learned this on Reddit or somewhere random but it is clear you don't understand it.

Smart move.

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Or in this case what a "change of subject" is.


If you don't know now I ain't going to be able to help you.


LMAO

That's quite a tangle of someones and others

You really are a confused woman. It's okay. I'm here to help you.

[QUOTE=WilliamTheIrish;17481051]You really are a confused woman. It's okay. I'm here to help you.[/QUOTE]



I'm glad you have a computer and they changed your clothes today.


Congrats.

Serious question, is English your first language?

While I'm a typical American who only learned English, I lack the perspective of having to translate things into a native language along with meaning/context; but I do try to understand the best I can.

That seems to be the case here, where instead of applying what DK actually means to what I said, you completely misinterpreted what I said and interpreted it in a way that doesn't make any sense.

So, either that's ironically the best example of meta-DK DK I've seen, or there's a serious challenge interpreting words on a screen... but, I want to be sensitive to any language barriers and not assume things.

Back to the OP...

Thought this was interesting form "how bout those CHIEFS"


https://youtu.be/YMu2Qw4dx98?si=DmwUePUtQFf7qSWI


https://youtu.be/F6dJkq_AXHE?si=BwWyk1Ajw3uuN-YN

Of course I am NOT taking this "lightly" but hope maybe? :thumb:

Interesting gambit.

But no, I don’t think you understand what Dunning-Kruger findings mean OR how to apply them in real life.

And I’m no expert on the paper but IQ is not an area of expertise. It is not a discipline to work in. You are born with it.


Calling someone dumb because they think they are smarter than your buddy is not understanding the concept.

Let’s say you go fishing for the first time. You may think you are better than you are and the person teaching you may underestimate their ability but it does not follow that if the teacher thinks they are better than the student at fishing they are wrong.

I was calling you dumb because you don't possess the ability to realize WTI's intelligence, and that's not relative to my own or your own. It's an objective measure beyond agreeing with someone on the internet or mashing reerun on your keyboard over and over.

DK also says people with higher intelligence tend to assume those around them possess the same level of intelligence.

And in this case, did you do that? Had you possessed that ability and assumed I knew what DK was, you wouldn't have mashed out on your keyboard a completely different definition of DK to make yourself sound smarter while telling me I didn't know what I was talking about and giving me some elementary example.... that's literally what DK says, smart people don't do that.

Thanks for proving my point several times over and I apologize for overestimating you when I thought you were better than the other resident keyboard masher/reerun caller.... my bad.

Do you own a BMW 335i too?

M-Sport, asshole! :harumph:

At least the 335i doesn't pretend to be an M car

It's not a "definition". It was research and you still don't understand the findings.

Thanks for trying to dunk on me with it though. It was fun watching you fail.


:D


As you can see, the findings reported by Kruger and Dunning are often interpreted to suggest that the less competent people are, the more competent they think they are. People who perform worst at a task tend to think they’re god’s gift to said task, and the people who can actually do said task often display excessive modesty. I suspect we find this sort of explanation compelling because it appeals to our implicit just-world theories: we’d like to believe that people who obnoxiously proclaim their excellence at X, Y, and Z must really not be so very good at X, Y, and Z at all, and must be (over)compensating for some actual deficiency; it’s much less pleasant to imagine that people who go around shoving their (alleged) superiority in our faces might really be better than us at what they do.

Unfortunately, Kruger and Dunning never actually provided any support for this type of just-world view; their studies categorically didn’t show that incompetent people are more confident or arrogant than competent people. What they did show is this:

https://i0.wp.com/talyarkoni.org/blo...ng?w=434&ssl=1

https://talyarkoni.org/blog/2010/07/...t-is-and-isnt/

leaving the scene is not it’s own charge, it’s just part of the test to see if the criteria is met for the other charges brought against him.

Sec. 22.02. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT. (a) A person commits an offense if the person commits assault as defined in >Sec. 22.01 and the person:

(1) causes serious bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse; or

(2) uses or exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the assault.

(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree

So at least one 2nd degree felony charge, that's bad.

Per TRANSP § 550.021 it looks like the collision causing serious bodily injury is the charge that's tied to him having left the scene, which is to be a third degree felony. The other six counts could go either way.

This is going to end in a guilty plea deal.

I've got a bad feeling that Rashee Rice isn't playing much in 2024, if at all.

Well I have it on good authority from the CP legal brain trust that I'm a ****ing moron for first suggesting that Rice would have to admit he was driving, then for suggesting he'd get suspended, then for putting the suspension at 4-8 games.

So don't worry, he good.

M4.

Most of you seem so uneducated on BMWs current lineup. There’s nothing illegitimate about the M240i, M340i, M440i, or any other “M-lite” version of the lineup. Each one of those cars is extremely fast but doesn’t have the track acumen of the actual “M” cars. For daily driving the M lite cars are fantastic and still too fast for most driving conditions. Go read up on the B58 motor and perhaps then you’ll understand a bit more. Oh, and the 335i was a great car.

According to many on here what Rice did was a nothing burger and he’ll be getting a slap on the wrist from the Chiefs and the league. If the league wants to send a message about irresponsible and reckless driving in the wake of Ruggs and now this, unfortunately Rashee Rice is going to be on the receiving end of it. We’ll know soon enough, and whatever he gets he’ll deserve and hopefully learn from it.

Then the NFL is ****ed up beyond repair.

Kamara gets like 3 games for beating a dude within an inch of his life. And Rashee isn't playing much in a whole season.

****ing horrendous bullshit.

I think most people are just flipping you shit... their inline 6s are great engines with outstanding performance and gas mileage for a daily driver without spending $100k+ on a new M... whether or not BMW wants to slap badges all over them.

Unlike the Kamara situation, Rice decided to be an absolute idiot at the worst possible time, related to what Ruggs did previously. It doesn’t matter that he didn’t serious injure or kill anyone like Ruggs. It’s the behavior itself. Maybe it’s 8 games, maybe it’s 6 reduced to 4. Who knows?

Yep probably right!