ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Broncos trade for Russell Wilson (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=342879)

staylor26 03-08-2022 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16180812)
He averages almost the same amount of TD passers per year as Aaron Rodgers.

Aaron Rodgers has 20 more TDs the last 2 years you butt****ing moron.

staylor26 03-08-2022 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16180828)
Obviously Denver disagrees because Russell Wilson was their back-up choice after failing to get Aaron Rodgers.

If they thought Wilson > Rodgers then why not make Wilson their #1 target from the beginning?

He’s just going to ignore that part like he did when I mentioned it.

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16180828)
Obviously Denver disagrees because Russell Wilson was their back-up choice after failing to get Aaron Rodgers.

If they thought Wilson > Rodgers then why not make Wilson their #1 target from the beginning?

It's possible that he was or became that some time ago. I doubt this all happened today. This has been in the works for at least weeks.

staylor26 03-08-2022 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16180833)
It's possible that he was or became that some time ago. I doubt this all happened today. This has been in the works for at least weeks.

LMAO

Imagine believing this.

penguinz 03-08-2022 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16180831)
Aaron Rodgers has 20 more TDs the last 2 years you butt****ing moron.

And Rogers has half the INTs and 30 fewer sacks while playing in more games than Wilson.

BWillie 03-08-2022 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 16180837)
And Rogers has half the INTs and 30 fewer sacks while playing in more games than Wilson.

Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.

Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too.

staylor26 03-08-2022 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16180841)
Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.

Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too.

Yea just ignore the 20 more TDs the last 2 years part he was responding to too because there’s no dancing around that….

BigRedChief 03-08-2022 05:56 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Specific picks Denver is trading to Seattle in exchange for Russell Wilson: <br><br>Denver’s 2022 first-round pick (No. 9)<br>Denver’s own 2022 second-round pick (No. 40)<br>Denver’s 2023 first- and second-round picks.<br>Denver&#39;s 2022 fifth-round round pick for Seattle&#39;s 2022 fourth-round pick</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1501340308948369422?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16180835)
LMAO

Imagine believing this.

If anything Rodgers has proven himself to be a drama queen. You can see my posts in this thread. And I am not all the excited about Wilson either.

BWillie 03-08-2022 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16180843)
Yea just ignore the 20 more TDs the last 2 years part he was responding to too because there’s no dancing around that….

Ok ok ok you win. Denver should have not traded for Russell Wilson and instead traded for Jimmy Garropolololol. That would have given them the best chance to beat the Kansas City Chiefs.

louie aguiar 03-08-2022 05:58 PM

Denver got a lot better today. The AFC west will be very tough next year. It’s very hard to be as consistently dominant in the division as the Chiefs have been.

penguinz 03-08-2022 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16180841)
Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.

Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too.

You think you are helping your argument but you aren't. Only thing Wilson may be superior to Roger's is selfishness.

Skyy God 03-08-2022 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16180815)
It will be interesting to see what happens bc Wilson’s cap hit are $24 million this year and $27 million next year. So they will have quite a bit of money to spend being 11th in cap space post Russ trade per overthecap.

They’ll probably sign a few big players bc they have a 3 year window of cheap QB salary IMO

Lol.

Wilson will want a new contract.

Red Dawg 03-08-2022 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 16180847)
Denver got a lot better today. The AFC west will be very tough next year. It’s very hard to be as consistently dominant in the division as the Chiefs have been.

Brady and Manning are frauds. Their divison were shit. Always shit and look what we deal with. Denver cant draft a QB for shit but get Manning and now Wilson. ****ing lucky ****s.

staylor26 03-08-2022 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16180846)
Ok ok ok you win. Denver should have not traded for Russell Wilson and instead traded for Jimmy Garropolololol. That would have given them the best chance to beat the Kansas City Chiefs.

That is not at all what this argument is you dumb ****.

You said him and Rodgers are basically the same.

Yes, Wilson is way better than Jimmy G.

See how easy it is not to be a dumabss?

FloridaMan88 03-08-2022 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16180833)
It's possible that he was or became that some time ago. I doubt this all happened today. This has been in the works for at least weeks.

They may have negotiated the framework of the Wilson deal a while back, but the fact it wasn’t executed until after Rodgers confirmed he was staying in Green Bay is telling.

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 16180837)
And Rogers has half the INTs and 30 fewer sacks while playing in more games than Wilson.

right now...they both have 1 Super Bowl win with Wilson appearing in 2 of them and who did Wilson beat to go to his last Super Bowl? Arron Rodgers.

AR is the better QB, but the results are about the same.

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16180854)
They may have negotiated the framework of the Wilson deal a while back, but the fact it wasn’t executed until after Rodgers confirmed he was staying in Green Bay is telling.

Nothing is executed until the 16th,

TribalElder 03-08-2022 06:05 PM

cross post
https://i.imgur.com/kPJG8aN.png

HC_Chief 03-08-2022 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16180864)

****ing drama queen. smh

penguinz 03-08-2022 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16180860)
right now...they both have 1 Super Bowl win with Wilson appearing in 2 of them and who did Wilson beat to go to his last Super Bowl? Arron Rodgers.

AR is the better QB, but the results are about the same.

Not sure that NFCCG is one to use to prop either qb up. Wilson's rating was under 50 and Rogers was just over 50.

Fishels 03-08-2022 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16179776)
LMAO

Far cry from Aaron Rodgers.

Nah the donkeys are lucky to miss him. Rodgers would start drama three games in.

Russel actually has a chance to unite this team. This hurts because I like Wilson and now I gotta hate him.

God damn

BWillie 03-08-2022 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fishels (Post 16180882)
Nah the donkeys are lucky to miss him. Rodgers would start drama three games in.

Russel actually has a chance to unite this team. This hurts because I like Wilson and now I gotta hate him.

God damn

I don't get the argument that Russell Wilson is selfish...like Aaron Rodgers isn't? Aaron Rodgers is one of the most selfish sons of bitches in all of the NFL.

manchambo 03-08-2022 06:32 PM

I have to say that I'm more comfortable giving up all that capital for Wilson than Rogers. Not because I think Wilson is better, of course, he's certainly not.

But with Rogers the window might be one or two years. Imagine you give up all that trade capital and he gets hurt early in the season. With Wilson, the window is probably 5+ years, so you have time even if he gets injured, time to tweak the roster, etc.

I don't know if teams actually think of it this way, but you could view it as amortization. With Wilson the trade capital is amortized over a longer period.

burt 03-08-2022 06:34 PM

Y'all keep saying he is declining, but did you see him compete in that QB contest at the Pro Bowl? He smoked 'em all. I have him in the top 10 QB group and that's a hell of an upgrade for Denver....

ChiefsFan123456 03-08-2022 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burt (Post 16180904)
Y'all keep saying he is declining, but did you see him compete in that QB contest at the Pro Bowl? He smoked 'em all. I have him in the top 10 QB group and that's a hell of an upgrade for Denver....

Unfortanely! I wish they kept Lock but adding Russell will make the division tougher and Chiefs will have to earn the AFC West championship next year

Halfcan 03-08-2022 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16180916)
Unfortanely! I wish they kept Lock but adding Russell will make the division tougher and Chiefs will have to earn the AFC West championship next year

So the Chiefs did not "earn" it the last 6 years?

gunns 03-08-2022 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 16180040)
In summary, the broncos traded away more than twice as much for 33 year-old Russell Wilson than the Chiefs traded for a rookie Patrick Mahomes II.

Trading draft picks is different. It's the draft value of each pick and actually KC gave up about 185+ more than they needed to

ChiefsFan123456 03-08-2022 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16180919)
So the Chiefs did not "earn" it the last 6 years?

How about focusing on the present? No one cares about the past

Graystoke 03-08-2022 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16180864)

Insert-shut up bitch-tweet

TwistedChief 03-08-2022 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunns (Post 16180920)
Trading draft picks is different. It's the draft value of each pick and actually KC gave up about 185+ more than they needed to

You do realize there are a lot of draft value charts out there, right? But with a standard one, giving up 185 points is equivalent to a mid-3rd, right? And any team in the NFL would be jumping for joy to trade up to acquire a generational QB of the future like Mahomes if it meant they gave up a 3rd above fair value?

Try harder.

dlphg9 03-08-2022 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunns (Post 16180920)
Trading draft picks is different. It's the draft value of each pick and actually KC gave up about 185+ more than they needed to

Shut the **** up you idiot. What a dumb ****ing post.

DTVietnam 03-08-2022 06:58 PM

The corniest player in the NFL is going to get his teeth kixcked in 2 times a year. .

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hTHJ7lLA10Y" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

staylor26 03-08-2022 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunns (Post 16180920)
Trading draft picks is different. It's the draft value of each pick and actually KC gave up about 185+ more than they needed to

LMAO

Trolls everywhere.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16180927)
How about focusing on the present? No one cares about the past

You are the one that said they didn't earn it. I guess the Chiefs did not earn one of the longest winning streaks in NFL history against the Donks either?

Chiefs will still sweep the Cheating Donks this year. Wilson was horrible last year. Trading all that draft stock was stupid and will keep them in the basement for the next five years.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunns (Post 16180920)
Trading draft picks is different. It's the draft value of each pick and actually KC gave up about 185+ more than they needed to

ROFL

You better get your season ticket money sent in sucker.

rtmike 03-08-2022 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 16180870)
****ing drama queen. smh

HB, see ya bitch!
Take your bidness decisions somewhere else.

Rasputin 03-08-2022 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16180927)
How about focusing on the present? No one cares about the past

So you don't give a **** about Super Bowl LIV?


I ****ing do and we earned that shit. We came back from behind in every playoff game and the Super Bowl. We beat the Donks 13 times in a row. Does that not count because it's in the past?


We are focused on the present and still enjoy the success we had over the last 6 years. It's not like the Raiders bringing up they have 3 Lombardi yeah from the early 80's who gives a ****. I do care about the present and the past and the future.

HemiEd 03-08-2022 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 16179784)
"Multiple first round picks"

Excellent eeexxxccceeeelent!

No picks left forever, guess they thought it worked for the Rams

rtmike 03-08-2022 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 16180981)
So you don't give a **** about Super Bowl LIV?


I ****ing do and we earned that shit. We came back from behind in every playoff game and the Super Bowl. We beat the Donks 13 times in a row. Does that not count because it's in the past?


We are focused on the present and still enjoy the success we had over the last 6 years. It's not like the Raiders bringing up they have 3 Lombardi yeah from the early 80's who gives a ****. I do care about the present and the past and the future.

That game ended right after halftime.

There were no adjustments for PI that Madison had that they could have adjusted to, imo.

It was apparent the refs weren't gonna let them play.

I'm obviously still pissed over the ending of 1st half, lol.

Rams Fan 03-08-2022 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 16180733)
To some extent, I disagree. In talking to a lot of Bronco fans around here, a lot of them are just excited to not be god awful next year. Think of this as being a better version of the Chiefs bringing in Alex Smith. Will they win the Super Bowl in the next 2 years? I doubt it. But at least they have a reason to watch on Sundays.

Alex Smith didn't cost nearly close to what Wilson did or impact the cap as much as him, though.

There's a difference between getting a stop gap and draft a guy in the first vs paying a ransom for Wilson.

Rams Fan 03-08-2022 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16180846)
Ok ok ok you win. Denver should have not traded for Russell Wilson and instead traded for Jimmy Garropolololol. That would have given them the best chance to beat the Kansas City Chiefs.

That's not the argument at all.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 07:44 PM

Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

BWillie 03-08-2022 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTVietnam (Post 16180948)
The corniest player in the NFL is going to get his teeth kixcked in 2 times a year. .

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hTHJ7lLA10Y" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

He's Carlton from the Fresh Prince of Bel Aire

BWillie 03-08-2022 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181027)
Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

I will bet you whatever dollar amount you please this will not occur.

kcpasco 03-08-2022 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181027)
Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

I would laugh but that’s highly unlikely.

RealSNR 03-08-2022 07:53 PM

Also if Nathaniel is anything like his dad, he’ll suck dick as a head coach

penguinz 03-08-2022 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181027)
Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

Your posts have been the most ignorant posts on this board for quite awhile. You should be proud of that as there are people that are purposely posting dumb shit, me included, yet yours are even worse.

rogue719 03-08-2022 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16179799)
Half of their team... almost literally.

All of the talk that Russell Wilson will be walking into a more talented/better team in Denver than what he had in Seattle... what will be remaining for him in Denver after the trade may not be much more of an upgrade from his surrounding talent in Seattle.

Denver doesn't have a WR or offensive weapon anything close to the likes of DJ Metcalf.

They gave up a backup QB. They gave up one of the guys in the D-line rotation. They gave up their starting TE, but have another TE almost as good, just as fast and excellent hands (Albert O from Missouri)

They give up their first rounder this year and next year. They give up one of their second rounders this year but have another they got in a trade for Miller. They also give up a second rounder next year, but have two third round picks this year. They give up a fourth rounder, but get a fifth rounder back along with Wilson and have two third round picks this season.

On the offense, they still have a solid WR corps in Patrick, Sutton, Jeudy and Hamler. They have a very young offensive line that has a hole at RT to fill, but they are changing their offensive system to an outside zone running scheme (the same used in GB and also was used by Shanahan in Denver in the 90's) and they have Javonte Williams running the ball and catching out of the backfield.

The defense will be roughly the same as last year. Fangio's replacement as D-coordinator is from the Fangio tree and understands the defense and most of the pieces are already in place.

Will there be hiccups? No doubt, but I noticed that the Chiefs this past year didn't look like the team that won the SB two years ago, either. Everything changes.

ChiefsFan123456 03-08-2022 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181027)
Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

You are dumb if you think that, Lock is garbage

penguinz 03-08-2022 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16181059)
You are dumb if you think that, Lock is garbage

It's one of his most logical posts lately as well. Lounge version of a certain Floridian that only posts in DC.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16181059)
You are dumb if you think that, Lock is garbage

It is called sarcasm idiot. You Donk trolls post this kind of nonsense and then act like it is the gospel.

I don't think Wilson makes it through the season. He has always taken a ton of sacks and that Donk Oline is garbage. The little guy has taken a Lot of hits.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 16181072)
It's one of his most logical posts lately as well. Lounge version of a certain Floridian that only posts in DC.

Says the delusional Biden ass licker. :doh!:

rogue719 03-08-2022 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16180919)
So the Chiefs did not "earn" it the last 6 years?

Let's say that the level of competition in the division has been sorely lacking the last few seasons. Even with Herbert starting his third season he's had the inconsistencies that come with rookie QB's.

ChiefsFan123456 03-08-2022 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181085)
It is called sarcasm idiot. You Donk trolls post this kind of nonsense and then act like it is the gospel.

I don't think Wilson makes it through the season. He has always taken a ton of sacks and that Donk Oline is garbage. The little guy has taken a Lot of hits.

Sure :rolleyes:

penguinz 03-08-2022 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181088)
Says the delusional Biden ass licker. :doh!:

See, this is how ignorant you are. I have never supported Biden. If you could read you would know that.

Now keep DC shit out of the lounge.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456 (Post 16181094)
Sure :rolleyes:

Funny, all we heard was that Lock was going to be the man!! He flexed at Arrowhead and Donk fans went nuts- now they can't get rid of him fast enough.

Now it is onto Wilson who was injured and terrible last year.

12 starters since Five Head- and Donk fans have pimped them all. They deserve to be trolled.

Halfcan 03-08-2022 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 16181096)
See, this is how ignorant you are. I have never supported Biden. If you could read you would know that.

Now keep DC shit out of the lounge.

Sorry, I got you and your twin Penchief mixed up. Both of you have your panties in a wad tonight.

jerryaldini 03-08-2022 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 16179988)
Seattle pushed their shit in on that trade.
Fant is a bigger piece than I expected.
Wilson is a good qb but damn.

Don't think Rodgers wanted any part of the AFCW. Amazing when Wilson is the 3rd best QB in the division.

RunKC 03-08-2022 09:39 PM

I don’t understand this move at all for Seattle. Why the **** did they choose Pete Carroll over Russell Wilson?

And why the hell are they keeping Pete Carroll for this rebuild? The guy is 70 years old LMAO

CasselGotPeedOn 03-08-2022 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 16181027)
Lock will end up with better numbers next year.

My lord you are an absolute reerun.

Red Dawg 03-08-2022 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16181313)
I don’t understand this move at all for Seattle. Why the **** did they choose Pete Carroll over Russell Wilson?

And why the hell are they keeping Pete Carroll for this rebuild? The guy is 70 years old LMAO

No idea. Very puzzling.

BossChief 03-08-2022 09:52 PM

Losing Shelby Harris and Fangio is gonna hurt that defense, but they should score a lot.

Iowanian 03-08-2022 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16180831)
Aaron Rodgers has 20 more TDs the last 2 years you butt****ing moron.

You could also be less of an asshole when having a football discussion.

Red Dawg 03-08-2022 09:58 PM

Its troubles me that they traded him. What do they know that the media is missing? They see him in practice and know him well but yet they have no problem just getting rid of him and starting over from scratch. Clearly they think they gave him plenty to play well on offense but think he still sucked and isn't worth having anymore. Aee they right? Only time will tell.

Red Dawg 03-08-2022 09:59 PM

I mean you just don't get rid of your franchise QB at 34.

InChiefsHeaven 03-08-2022 10:01 PM

Not sure if this was posted, but Perna is hilarious:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lBNENNr87TY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TEX 03-08-2022 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16181346)
I mean you just don't get rid of your franchise QB at 34.

Stupid teams do stupid things...:shrug:

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 10:10 PM

Local Denver news reported today that Russell Wilson has the most QB wins over the past 10 years amongst active quarterbacks. Tb12 would be number one if you still in the league at 119. Wilson is at 104 in Rogers is at like 96

carcosa 03-08-2022 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16181366)
Local Denver news reported today that Russell Wilson has the most QB wins over the past 10 years amongst active quarterbacks. Tb12 would be number one if you still in the league at 119. Wilson is at 104 in Rogers is at like 96

Neat!

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven (Post 16181349)
Not sure if this was posted, but Perna is hilarious:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lBNENNr87TY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That dude is an unbearable douche

Red Dawg 03-08-2022 10:33 PM

Most wins for what? He has one ring like 10 years ago.

poolboy 03-08-2022 11:01 PM

DK, Lockett > Sutton, Jeudy

staylor26 03-08-2022 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 16181438)
DK, Lockett > Sutton, Jeudy

Absolutely. Anybody telling themselves differently is likely a Bronco homer.

But they do have a better #3 than Seattle did, a better RB, a slightly better OL, and a better defense (though their defense should regress a bit).

They’ll be a playoff contender if everything comes together and they stay healthy.

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16181394)
Most wins for what? He has one ring like 10 years ago.

Most wins as a quarterback

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 16181438)
DK, Lockett > Sutton, Jeudy

How much better. 10 times better. five times better... how much better?

neech 03-08-2022 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16181370)
That dude is an unbearable douche

.

GloucesterChief 03-08-2022 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16181449)
Absolutely. Anybody telling themselves differently is likely a Bronco homer.

But they do have a better #3 than Seattle did, a better RB, a slightly better OL, and a better defense (though their defense should regress a bit).

They’ll be a playoff contender if everything comes together and they stay healthy.

Seattle's OL looks worse than it is because Russ holds the ball forever and takes sacks.

poolboy 03-08-2022 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 16181455)
How much better. 10 times better. five times better... how much better?

too much math bro

Garcia Bronco 03-08-2022 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 16181462)
too much math bro

Is it an insurmountable amount of better?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.