![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd say it's more likely they restructure his deal and he stays. with his injury history and age, he's not going to get any huge deal on the open market. If he stays he's got a shot at a ring. I think Houston's made a ton of money, and would want that more than anything. |
Quote:
This is his best chance to get one last good payday. |
My point about not being able to trade Dee Ford is the Chiefs won’t have the luxury of leverage. Teams will know he doesn’t fit a 4-3, and possibly decide to keep bidding low or wait for release.
I’m still laughing because people think we have personal for 4-3, hint.... We dont |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why would he take a pay cut? Some 3-4 team will still pay him good money, plus he won’t have to play DE, a position he hasn’t played in over 7 years |
Quote:
|
Lol if we lose Dee Ford (going to happen) and Houston in same offseason lol
|
Quote:
Wanna know where else he can get a ring? |
It's not like he's going to get a max contract on the open market. He's 30, hasn't had a 10-sack season in five years, and is oft-injured.
I bet if the Chiefs offer him $10 million a year he takes it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How many snaps per game are they in their base front? Les than 20%?
|
Quote:
|
TO THE ****ING SHIP!!!!!!!!!!
|
Houston seems to like it in kc. I think they’ll keep him around but who knows
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I just don't think that's how it will shake out, but if so, that's fine. For half that money, you can get a solid 4-3 end. We also have two #2 picks that were shit OLB's as coverage guys but show some pass rush potential. Let's see what shakes out. |
Personnel Fits/Keys to the 4-3 Front
If you want to run a 4-3 front, what are the key positions to focus on? And what type of skill set are you looking for at those spots? Here are the four positions, starting with the "3-technique" defensive tackle, that I would point to first when building a front seven in the 4-3. —"3-Technique" defensive tackle Speed/quickness up the field with the ability to use technique/power at the point of attack to hold the gap. Think of the Bucs’ Gerald McCoy and the Bengals' Geno Atkins or look to this year’s draft class with Pittsburgh’s Aaron Donald and Florida State’s Timmy Jernigan. —"Open-side" defensive end The majority of NFL offenses are right handed in terms of formation and alignment, so I look to the open-side end (or right end) as a key factor in the 4-3 front. You want size, length and true athletic ability on the edge of the defense that can hold the point, turn the corner versus an offensive tackle and play the cutback against the run game. That’s the Rams’ Robert Quinn or the Giants’ Jason Pierre-Paul with Jadeveon Clowney up next in this year’s draft class. —Will ‘backer In the 4-3, the Will ‘backer is going to pursue to the football, shoot backside gaps and clean up on cutback runs. He is the “playmaker” at the second level for defenses that run the 40 front. Again, think about athletic ability (versus both the run and the pass) with the Bucs’ Lavonte David or the Bears’ Lance Briggs as prime examples of the skill set you want at the Will 'backer position. —Mike ‘backer The Mike ‘backer has to showcase change of direction skills (hip transition), speed down the field in Cover 2 and also fill the hole as a downhill defender versus the one and two-back power-run game. That was Brian Urlacher in the past. And in today’s game, I look at the Panthers’ Luke Kuechly and the Cowboys’ Sean Lee. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/...efensive-front |
Quote:
So let’s take our strength and ruin it! Like I said we will preform about same as this year next but with less sacks. There is NOTHING outside of Spags 3 years coaching a good defense that should inspire ANY of you with confidence. Add in the fact it will be a defensive rebuild year and you have your built in excuse. You guys are hanging your hat on optimism that it won’t be worse because XYZ. Well Spag is the only guy available who has coached teams to worse. My only hope is we cut Houston/trade-release ford and find a great FA DE (maybe Clowney) add a guy like David Irving on a short contract. And find secondary/MLB.... But that is a tall ****ing order to fill |
You are reeeeeeeallly overstating the difficulty of this change.
|
So they are going to let go a guy who had 13 sacks and another who's had 9 back to back years lol no they arent knock it off with the awful takes
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don’t see why they won’t have a good pass rush next year with Jones and one of Houston or ford plus a full offseason of acquisitions We’ll see I guess |
Quote:
Yeah I get it you think it will make a difference, I’ll point out other teams who have in last 5 years moved from 3-4 to 4-3 taking 2-3 years to be good. Someone else will come in and make the dumb comment that 4-3 DEs are easy to find. And how Hitches can somehow play MLB in a 4-3. Then someone will come in and say DE is speak natural position so he for sure must be better. And Houston will be fine at DE.... etc etc I get it, But history says otherwise |
Teams usually switch when they have regime changes and their talent is ass
The chiefs talent apparently isn’t ass. |
Houston might end up at SLB
Quote:
|
so probably going with a 4-3? That might help hitchens, hopefully anyways. Chris Jones will be a monster on the inside. But I'm not sure how Houston and Ford fits into that, maybe our 2nd round pick from a couple of years ago Tanoh Kpassagnon will finally be developed and fit in as a DE?? I'm not really sure about Speaks either. DoD might fit in well at linebacker in that scheme with his speed.
I don't really know, just thinking out loud pretty much. |
Quote:
Our DE - good/decent -NT was ass - OLB good - MLB Ass - CBs assish - Saftey Ass |
Chargers did it in one year.
|
I'd flip Dee Ford for JPP, release Houston and use that extra money to target Jordan Hicks if he makes it to the open market.
Trade for a #1 corner, add another DE in the 2nd day of the draft and than we'll be cooking with some heat. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But your point stands... |
I'd keep Houston/Ford, try to sign Thomas 1 yr, draft a corner at the end of the first and an interior lineman in the 2nd
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If it were me, I'm drafting corners, safeties, and LB'ers.
|
Quote:
Does it really matter that they’re switching schemes when the defense was complete dog shit as is? Like are they going to get worse? I sure don’t see it. |
Quote:
Plus in some packages you could kick Jones outside to end, line up Ford at the other, kick Houston to OLB, Nadi & Rookie inside. |
Quote:
If we can't trade for an elite CB then yeah, I think you have to seriously consider going CB #1 and then see how you can work them in with Fuller, Nelson and Ward. It would be nice if you could put Fuller back at NCB but he has done a good job outside. |
The scheme change isn’t even nearly as big of a factor nowadays anyways. As others have noted, teams are in nickel and dime packages mostly anyways.
It’s about how he will adjust, prepare, develop talent, and motivate them as a unit. That’s where the difference must be made. |
Quote:
Jones is the only 3 tech, unless you sign Bailey back for that which I seriously doubt. |
People are also forgetting the $ that will be freeing up or not getting tied up on the offensive side of the ball. Namely at this point Morse. He will not be retained. We have some younger guys on offense that can help $ wise cause we are going to need it for Hill\Kelce\Mahomes in the coming year or two.
|
Quote:
Also Sutton's defenses always lacked swagger. Need some nastiness .... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The biggest thing is that The Chiefs have been incredibly fundamentally unsound. Stupid penalties, poor tackling-hell, even with the hairbrained scheme, if we were just better at the basics that defense would've been 20-ish. And I still say it had enough high picks on it to have been a middle of the pack defense talent-wise. The secondary appeared to be a poorly coached mess. The front seven was not disciplined. As much as everyone loves Dee Ford's sack totals, he can be blocked by a ****ing WR on a running play. He was total shit at setting the edge. Inexcusable. There are still pieces here to build with, there's still some talent, and the team is a solid and consistent situation for Spags. He's shown he can thrive in that sort of situation, so I'm cautiously optimistic. |
Quote:
We hear it every year on both sides of the ball...it all starts in the trenches |
Quote:
|
All of these big contracts are either up, big paydays due, or it's the first year you could reasonably cut guys and absorb the cap hits.
We might well get ****ed on Berry, depending on this surgery business, although I have yet to see an official indication of the surgery. Bailey's up, and was pricey. Sorensen was way overpaid but you can cut him June 1, Ford's gonna paid (but not by us, and we're going to get a decent pick) Houston's not going to get $21.1m. Looking at last year's draft and offseason, it literally looks like they were stacking up to make a change this offseason. I'm not saying they knew who the DC would be, but it would appear that they marked the spot in which a change could be done. Coupled with Andy's remarks about inside pressure being the key going forward. Get the new offense going with Mahomes in '18, flip the defense in '19. |
Bad bad bad hire.
|
Quote:
|
Did CP already write off 2019 as disastrous?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its a stale zero impact hire that wont produce as we hoped.. Same as it ever was... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only thing you should be laughing about is this garbage post you just put out there. Do you think Ford never had to set an edge in the 3-4? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're Welcome! |
Quote:
Your football takes are pretty much atrocious. |
Holy shit Spags had Turk McBride on his defense in 2012. No wonder it was terrible LMAO
|
Why do ppl think ford will have no trade value? There isn’t enough pass rushing talent to bid low and wait for his release. There’s 32 teams and possible 2 great pass rushers available. He can play in this defense but they should get return for him now rather than sign him long term, or have him play one year on the tag and walk for free.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is he great at it? Nope, but Sutton's run schemes were about as bad as there is. |
Quote:
|
I wasn't overly enthused about this hire when it first came to light that he was the favourite. But now its all done, and after looking at his philosophy/record in more detail, I think I can get behind this appointment now. One thing that I find encouraging is firstly that he's coached at pretty much every level of the defense. DB's, Defensive line etc. So he'll know exactly what he wants from his defense In every area. He's also got a reputation of improving his players, something Sutton struggled with for the most part. I also like the fact that he's shown his brilliance on the biggest stage against what was deemed an unstoppable force when he stopped the Pats offense in the 2007 superbowl.
All we can do now is hope that this appointment can be looked back on in years to come as a turning point for the franchise. If he can give Pat a top fifteen defense over the next few years then I have no doubt that we can win the whole thing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
By that measure, Chiefs had no leverage with Alex Smith. Leverage is created by more than one team being interested. If Chiefs put non-exclusive tag on Ford, more than 1 team will be interested. I wouldn't trade him unless you're getting a high 2 at minimum. The league is starved for pass rushers and not many are hitting the market. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And if one gets fired for having a poor defense what happens? Will they get another job in the league? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.