This.

Leaks to try to convince someone to trade up.

Nobody is going to bite (or if they do, it will have nothing to do with this stupid leak but rather a king's ransom to get Garrett) - Garrett is by far and away the class of the field this year and the Browns have another pick at 12 with no clear distinction between the QBs.

They can take the consensus #1 player in the draft (by a TON) and still get a QB that is as likely to be successful as Trubisky is at 12, if only because they're all dice rolls in this draft.

Stupid article is stupid.

This. Either draft him, or trade the pick for capital next year

You're shitting me.

A guy that quit the team his senior year, has serious fumble issues, can't catch out of the backfield and can't pass protect is 'medium risk'?

WTF qualifies as 'high risk' in your world? Does one have to actually be indicted for murder during the pre-draft process before he hits that mark?

Oh, and as for high reward - dude's fast, but he's not agile, he's an upright runner and again - fumbles all the time and can't catch passes out of the backfield.

Joe Williams is a shit, shit, SHIT prospect, especially for this team. He's a worthwhile gamble in the 7th (because again - speed), but that's about it. There are literally 15 running backs in this draft more likely to contribute to this team than Joe Williams. Hell, there are 2 running backs named Williams more likely to contribute.

Look who you ****ing quoted.

Oh.

I tend not to look closely at the poster because it colors my tone (I try to avoid being an asshole...I really do).

That makes more sense.

So...he's Knile Davis?

^^^

DJLN nailed it, IMO. All this means is that Cleveland is probably open to a trade for the right price, which would be a ton.

As I have said all along, if the Chiefs want a QB in the first round, they need to trade up a little bit. It sends a message that you really believe in the player, and they can also afford to trade picks right now more so than most teams. Maybe trade up to the late teens, early twenties. But this idea that all of the top guys will be gone by 15... not buying it whatsoever.

If we trade up for a QB Dorsey would really have to love the kid. Otherwise it won't happen.

If we take a QB at 27 Dorsey would really have to love the kid, so I don't really see your point?

That's why he should do it. If you really want a kid, make it clear. Part ways with a pick or two and go get the guy that you want to portray as the future face of the organization.

Of course, they may not love any of them. They could just as easily trade back or stand pat and draft a defensive player.

Would you shut the hell up about Peterman...JFC

There is no point in drafting any one of those turds. Stop posting this

The NFL is desperate to try to create some type of argument about who will go #1. Boring tv since Garrett has been the favorite since day 1.