Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 12210008)

I'm gonna with 'no'. I think they just take the top guy on their board at the time.

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 12209989)

Poe, yes.
I think that's part of the reason why they use him so much. Not worried about long term wear and tear.

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12209998)

So tied up in you homerism that you can't understand the purpose of this thread.

Yes, Chris Jones is a replacement pick. Period.

when Poe was hurt, howard took over the NT and was a stud. If Poe leaves Howard will move over then again leaving a spot at RDE open.

Chris Jones is a RDE in a 3-4 scheme.


Replacement


He might be a good,bad or mediocre replacement but he's a replacement pick. Just like Dorsey has done every year he's been in KC.

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12209998)

So tied up in you homerism that you can't understand the purpose of this thread.

Yes, Chris Jones is a replacement pick. Period.

when Poe was hurt, howard took over the NT and was a stud. If Poe leaves Howard will move over then again leaving a spot at RDE open.

Chris Jones is a RDE in a 3-4 scheme.


Replacement


He might be a good,bad or mediocre replacement but he's a replacement pick. Just like Dorsey has done every year he's been in KC.

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 12210024)

Homerism? You're a homer of your own theories. If Howard get's moved to NT and Jones plays DE then wouldn't Jones be more of a replacement for Howard at DE? Wasn't your previous theory that Howard was Poe's replacement when we signed him originally? And Russell is no way a replacement for Berry. What ever makes you feel smart though. You Duh Man!

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12210040)

It actually does make sense that if Jones does well, it makes Poe expendable. Regardless of who replaces who, it gives the Chiefs an option to not fork over a huge contract to Poe and still end up okay.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12210044)

Every draft pick is a replacement for someone.