ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Our d-line is just disappointing. Time to start over again. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263465)

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898170)
I wouldn't move away from the 3-4. I'd transition over to what the Texans and Cowboys run.

now this i could go for

Bring in a defensive consultant to help Crennel out with his HC/DC double duties. Have the consultant be a 3-4 guy who runs a 1-gap or at least knows how to run both.

Add some 1-gap plays into the scheme this year

Consultant takes over full DC duties next year and either run a hybrid system or go full 1-gap.

htismaqe 09-10-2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898210)
now this i could go for

Bring in a defensive consultant to help Crennel out with his HC/DC double duties. Have the consultant be a 3-4 guy who runs a 1-gap or at least knows how to run both.

Add some 1-gap plays into the scheme this year

Consultant takes over full DC duties next year and either run a hybrid system or go full 1-gap.

I LOVE this idea. Absolutely love it.

LiL stumppy 09-10-2012 12:16 PM

Start over? Jfc people

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898209)
I must have missed where Berry is a ****ing defensive lineman that can't rush the ****ing passer...

:rolleyes:

You said it was about taking QBs in the top 10. It's the same ****ing thing in the other years. The talent wasn't good at the QB position.Furthermore, I bet more Chiefs fans wanted to take Suh than Berry. Is Suh a d-linemen dumbass?

Edit: Here it is...

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898106)

What do most of those teams have in common? When they had a top 10 (or even top 5) pick, they took a QUARTERBACK.

We've spent so many top draft picks on linemen that we're woefully thin on top-tier talent elsewhere.


The Franchise 09-10-2012 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898210)
now this i could go for

Bring in a defensive consultant to help Crennel out with his HC/DC double duties. Have the consultant be a 3-4 guy who runs a 1-gap or at least knows how to run both.

Add some 1-gap plays into the scheme this year

Consultant takes over full DC duties next year and either run a hybrid system or go full 1-gap.

Anybody from the Patriots that can do that? :D


Seriously though.....Poe needs to be rotating in at DE. Powe showed flashes at NT. He should be getting snaps there.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 8898207)
20 rushes, 67 yds = 3.1ypc = meh, not good when it's only 20 carries in a game.

I'll put it this way, 3.1ypc isn't going to scare OC's away from the run game. What did effect this game was the fact the Falcons score on short field possessions. That means this defense got off easy in terms of PG stats. It was a lot worse than stats indicate, mugs.

I don't know man. It looked like they stopped them pretty well. Even Rodgers, who is a speed freak like Charles and Spiller. The best run I saw all day was the Matt Ryan TD run.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-10-2012 12:26 PM

The guys on Sirius were saying we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. We'd be dominate if we ran a 4-3 they said.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898227)
Anybody from the Patriots that can do that? :D


Seriously though.....Poe needs to be rotating in at DE. Powe showed flashes at NT. He should be getting snaps there.

I want Powe to be good. He was my favorite pick last year. He hardly played against the ones in the preseason. I saw him a little yesterday. I don't think we can really say we know the whole story there. However, I somewhat agree. I think rotating Poe across the WHOLE d-line would be pretty special. To this point, Poe has been much better than Powe in my opinion. We need Powe to be more destructive if he is going to be the starting NT. He's just not as destructive as Poe yet. Powe had a sack in the preseason but Poe has collapsed the pocket multiple times. He has made plays in every game.

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898227)
Anybody from the Patriots that can do that? :D


Seriously though.....Poe needs to be rotating in at DE. Powe showed flashes at NT. He should be getting snaps there.

I'm fine with Poe playing both.


The main thing i want is for the Oline to not be so comfortable with our DLine. The 2-gap system is very passive for the DLine. They intentionally engage the Oline and that takes a lot of pressure off the offensive lineman.

Now if every so often the Dline would just attack then the offensive lineman couldn't be so comfortable with their techniques etc.

1 down the Dline is responsible for 2-gap and have to maintain position

next down the Dline attacks and the linebackers have to be responsible for 1 of the gaps.

This would screw with the Olines blocking assignments and we would create more broken play and have guys running open in the backfield.

JMO

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898132)
Are you mentally challenged?

Brian Orapko, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing, Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman would have been far better selections than Jackson, as would Alex Mack, Jeremy Maclin, Percy Harvin, Eric Wood or Vontae Davis.

Tyson Jackson would have been a good choice in the third round. Number three overall?

Not so much.

Hindsight is 20/20. This is a horrible post. Look at the next ten picks after ours. Everyone passed on the guys you list there. The earliest any of those guys went was #13.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898213)
I LOVE this idea. Absolutely love it.

Which is why it'll never happen.

Plus, Pioli's set in his ways. If he's here next year, you can damn sure bet they'll be running the same schemes on both sides of the ball.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 12:35 PM

Poe could be a better DE than NT and Pioli would refuse to move him because it would be admitting a mistake.

HemiEd 09-10-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898110)
Second, Look at the picks the year Pioli took Jackson. They aren't very good players. maybe we could have taken Raji but he hasn't been that great. Jackson looks pretty good to me when you look at that class. I'm not really sure where you think we were going to get an impact player in that bunch?

Green Bay found one, similar to when they found Rodgers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Matthews_III

The Franchise 09-10-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898287)
Green Bay found one, similar to when they found Rodgers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Matthews_III

And IIRC....didn't they trade back into the 1st round to get him?

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898261)
Hindsight is 20/20. This is a horrible post. Look at the next ten picks after ours. Everyone passed on the guys you list there. The earliest any of those guys went was #13.

Urine idiot.

I'd suggest you stop posting and have a brain scan asap.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.