I will not disagree with that, he had just had 10 interceptions the previous season in NY.

But to say poor Herm was saddled with this guy, is not correct.

I was in that camp when Vermeil was here, but by the time Herm got Law to come play here, many knew Law was stop-gap at best.

Sure.............

More important than his three years here are his eight years, overall, IMO, and you cannot blame them all on Carl Peterson.

Yea, everybody KNEW a 38 year old cornerback was the future for another decade, right?

Gee, I feel for those that actually believed that. How anybody could assume Law would be anything more than stop-gap at his age, was delusional then.

Carl Peterson brought in Ty Law. He pushed for him from the beginning. As soon as his skills eroded, he was gone and youth was in. Herm's decision again to go young.

Also, whoever was talking about dismantling a team, and teams doing that every year in the draft...not like what we did this season. KC started rookies at LT, CB, CB, DT, Nickel CB, and played second year players at DE, DT, amongst other positions. When you "dismantle" a team, it's done like Herm did it.

Is Gregg Williams available?

anybody but GW. please lord! anyone but GW.

I heard Greg Robinson just got caanned!!!!!! lol

my opinion was that he got saddled with the IDEA - carl's idea - to "stay competative" one more year. Once he knew that he had to try and find some vets that would service his needs, ie - law et al.

Gunther belongs in KC forever.

You are correct. Which is also the same reason why Solari was made an Offensive Coordinator, and the same offense (that Saunders ran) was kept. Not because Herm was a fan of it, but because Carl Peterson was.

Yes. He'd make a fine steely-eyed, foul-mouthed towlboy.

He is a VERY good DC... and a crummy HC... so why NO GW?

For another decade? I don't know of anybody who was saying that. Way to move the goalposts....