This ain't even your gig. It's your bff that you are dying to defend his honor with every keystroke.

.

Unknown to you perhaps because them blinders are well blinding.

In terms of A smith. He too his team to the NFC championship team the year prior, played half the year with a team that did go to the superbowl. In the time that he played (before losing job to injury) he was the NFL's top rated passer. What that translates to next season, I don't know, but it certainly doesn't show a pattern of "shitty"the last 2 years.

That unfortunately are the facts of the matter, so quit trying to spin, twist, contort, distort or reerun them.

A more sensisble move would be simply to say: I don't like the move, I don't think he's going to do what we need him to do and move on.

Instead every one is revising history to back up those assumptions.

There we go.

Luv is a name that almost anyone on this board would recognize if they've been around for a while. You either know her as the passive aggressive old nag that tries to play mommy to the board, or you remember her antics in the beginning in which seeking out Daddy's approval she joined CP, only to have it turn into a forum to help her with her Daddy issues.

Over the years Luv has given us a litany of additions to the CP lexicon such as Grape gatorade, Moooo, and Endelt raped me. Of course that case took care of itself when in court proceedings Endelt got the case dismissed by simply asking the judge “How could it have been rape your honor? She was on top!”

Luv has also contributed greatly to our community by organizing the Springfield get togethers. Quite an accomplishment for someone to be able to organize board get togethers 200 miles away from the city the board is centrally located. There have been staggering numbers at these get togethers including 4, 3, 2, and a whole bunch of 1's.

What many people should really appreciate about Luv is that she is one of the members that takes a very personal approach to the board. And she's not afraid for the rest of us to learn from her mistakes. Such as, why you should never finance a car for a booty call you've been sleeping with for less than 3 months. How professing your illness on the board may lead someone of the opposite sex to picking up some grape gatorade for you and pounding your baby maker. Other gems include mid life crisis booty calls, and questioning the morals behind them after the deed has been done, how to find yourself in the friend zone with every individual you meet due to your own inability to hide your self consciousness, and why the postal service and their workers are such an important commodity to our society.

The good news is, after being laid off and taking the time to gain a certificate to become a paralegal from an onlinelocal instituion that offered an 18 week course, she is now no longer living with her father at 38 years of age, and only took a 40% pay cut. We should appreciate her showing us the value of a higher education. She really is an asset to the board, and someone we should appreciate being able to interact with on a daily basis.

Pros: This is a member that you have a legitimate shot of sleeping with, whether you are married or not. She's also someone that you can almost rest assured has less knowledge about the game of football than you do, which should help pump up your internet ego. Almost a guarantee to provide a laugh, and life lesson (or simple reminder) every time she starts a thread.

Cons: Doesn't include pics of numerous said booty calls (some may consider this a pro, apply to your life as needed) tends to be very passive aggressive when she disagrees with a take, or moderator decision. If you sleep with her, it may become a hot topic of board conversation for years to come.

Outlook for 2014: Luv is decreasing her activity on this board, but not in her online sexual life. This may change as her mid life crisis is transitioning from fun, to blowhard. Outside possibility of major board entertainment should she show up at this year's bash and sleep with Clay. Marriage is slim to none, as it's unlikely she'll ever take Daddy off of his pedestal and put a man in his place.

ROFL I seriously cherry picked that one. Feel free to blow it out of the water. I wasn't able to dedicate nearly as much time and research as I wanted too. The wife is commandeering the computer to watch her stupid chick shows.

This abortion of a thread is bad enough Geno Smith debates going on. Take it to the Geno thread

And yes, I will all of you!

Whatever smears the bloody carcass.

I'd rather not go over this once again by my God, whatever.

I personally don't think I deserved to be banned the first time. I was a 5.5 year regular, participated on this board as much as ANYBODY else, helped steer an entire offseason (2009), contributed to the lexicon, and had fans and enemies like anyone else. One of my 'enemies' decided to break the rules with the infraction system, again, on me. He looked for a reaction, I gave him what he looked for. I would say I crossed a line, but then I read a DaneMcCloud post and so I disagree. Dane, on two incidents (one was so glaringly bad mine probably can't even be considered an incident), said far worse things to members than I did and his only ban he received was a 1 day filter evasion bad. Yeah.

I was banned because the one guy who dishes out permabans on this site (who quit being a moderator for years to go run his own boards) holds a vendetta against me. Period. I called him out for things after he (like billay, like Frazod, like Dartgod) would poke me and then point their fingers at me when I gave them the reactions they were looking for...

There is no other reason to ban a diehard CHIEFS fan who posts as much about the CHIEFS as anyone on CHIEFSPLANET.COM after being a regular with nearly 30,000 posts in 5 years.

...you know, especially when the poll...where many of my 'enemies' votes...was 95% in my favor of not being banned.

Ari Chiefs, a guy who I called out on a thread for being a terrible human being, quit the board for 9 months in protest because of how outrageous the ban was.

and it was

I am not wrong here. I'm wrong a lot. Not in this case.

You're still talking about this shit? Holy crap man, get over it.

maybe a 2 week ban

that is something that would have been reasonable

even though I still think he had everything coming to him after getting drunk, twice, and purposely banning me using infractions while telling me shit I never asked to hear...and then expecting me to not grant his request for a reaction with a, you guessed it, reaction

The best part is he's rehashed that same ****tarded argument in this thread at least three or four times at this point.

I laughed, although it wasn't as mean as it could have been.

.