Who is out there still worth bringing in? Clowney? Ingram?

I'd trade a 1st to a meh team for their 1st next year in a heartbeat. They can get the QB available with a 5th year option.

But they aren’t exactly lacking in those either.

We have 2 picks in each of the first 4 rounds. They don’t have to trade down at all.

I’m not saying don’t, but I’m not saying we should be planning to do it either. See how the board falls before you even consider it.

That is an astute question.

We'll just have to pick and choose the ones we want to pay, trade, or let walk. Then replace them with more rookies and stop-gap vets, which is what we're doing.

A few years down the road we'll be out of Clark's debacle of a contract and Chris Jones is off the books. We'll have more money then. So instead of paying one stud player, we'll be able to pay three solid players.

The days of our top heavy, juggernaut, style of dominating the NFL are in the rear view mirror. We will win with a well balanced team with a super star QB and great OL. Veach's knack for finding gems in the draft will be vital. I think it's the only sensible approach at this point.

Yes.

Clowney, Ingram, and Clark is a decent veteran rotation, and paired with some young'uns would be perfectly okay.

I could see Veach moving around a little, small jumps up or back to get specific guys, but I kind of doubt there's a huge 'jump way up in the first round to get Jameson Williams' type move on the horizon.

I could be wrong, but I just doubt it.

Honestly, I hope you’re right. We have all those picks and we need several players. It wouldn’t be smart to make a huge trade and give away all the value we got from the trade.

Any moves down would include a pick next year.. that's the way to do it. Come into the drafts with an abundance of picks and go from there.

I’d be fine if they found a trade partner that was a high second round and traded down to grab a high second and like a 5th even if they threw in a seventh for it. Preferably trade off the 30 and see if they get an offer right away to also trade down for the 29th afterwards by someone trying to jump whatever team just traded for the 30.
Would love to see 4 2nd round picks and an additional 2 in the 5th

The brokedickest of brokedick pass rushers might be available.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No surprise but sounds very unlikely DE Dee Ford will be back with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/49ers?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#49ers</a> next season. GM John Lynch: &quot;I don’t see a lot of hope in him being a factor for us on the field moving forward.&quot; Ford&#39;s back injury just hasn&#39;t progressed to give Niners belief a return is possible.</p>&mdash; Nick Wagoner (@nwagoner) <a href="https://twitter.com/nwagoner/status/1508500735000035347?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Belichick traded his first rounders for 1st + 2nd rounders in preceding years all the time. It was a perpetual reloading strategy.

Damn him, Poe, Berry, pretty much everyone besides Houston from that defense has faded away into the abyss.

Are the Packers looking at FA receivers?

https://twitter.com/jacobs71/status/...326299136?s=21

So which guy on there might be available?

Swear, Davenport, and Chubb.

Would you trade 29 and next years 3 for burns

No. Just spend money next offseason and keep picks.

I’d imagine they’ll tag him

I wouldn't be opposed to using those stupid 7th rounders to move up in round 2 or 3 other than that I'm standing pat

****.. I can’t wait to bitch about draft picks. Why is the draft still so far away?

My favorite part of the draft on here is when a 1st round guy slides to the 2nd and for 24 hours this board loses its shit begging we move up to get said guy. Pure entertainment!

Then we select a center and a line backer and we lose our minds.

I was meh on the Bolton picked but it turns out it was a great pick. I remember him being mocked in the 1st in some mocks. Don't remember alot of posters pushing for him prior to the draft

PFF had him in their top 30. That's how I found him well before the draft. I knew he was the pick when we were on the clock. Steal.

He was originally on my list of 1st round targets last year.

Fun fact: so were Humphrey and Smith.

We are going to draft 2 DL early then free up money to get Sweat next Spring.

Good times

I’d rather have burns

Chiefs supposedly still interested in Landry…

Link: https://www.cleveland.com/browns/202...outputType=amp

Not buying it. We’re zoned into the draft. We’ve already signed our 2 FAWRs.

I agree with you. I have my doubts.

Jarvis Landry's agent Roosevelt Barnes tells Cleveland Browns that other teams are interested in signing Jarvis Landry.

The writer of the story, Mary Kay Cabot writing for Cleveland.com, just slips in the Kansas City Chiefs as one of those teams.

Maybe she has some other sources or maybe she wanted the story to have more interest. She used quote marks around the statement by Roosevelt but not around the KC news.

Too expensive. He will have to drop his price to like half.

Pass rushers in their prime are So expensive.

I'd rather we were able to draft and develop our own.

I mean, if ya gotta, ya gotta, but I'd rather not.

I just don't see Landry signing here. Veach obviously wants a youth movement looking at the guys he's signed so far.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">ESPN&#39;s <a href="https://twitter.com/diannaESPN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@diannaESPN</a> reported on SportsCenter this morning that the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> are actively making phone calls to try and trade for another top wide receiver. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a></p>&mdash; Devon Clements (@DevclemNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/DevclemNFL/status/1508782151633940483?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Watch it be Deebo.

Cooks or Lockett have to be the favorites right?

Nah. He's probably their best offensive player, he's not available.

Mclaurin or aj brown or deebo or dk

They’ve gotta pay him and bosa next offseason so maybe they’d move one?

I guess anything is possible...

No to both. Cooks is 28 and Lockett is 29.

They won't trade Deebo. They have shit without him.

:LOL: Yeah right...

That "out of nowhere" move I've referenced a few times.

If he pulls it off, it's going to be someone we weren't expecting.

The 9ers cap next year is way worse than ours iirc

nah, see, they're on their QBOTF's rookie deal.

I'm sure they'll move Jimmy G., but they won't move any weapons in their prime.

They need 'em in case Lance balls out.

I would love Brown, McLaurin or DK. DK would be very expensive next year to keep. McLarin or Brown is our best hope money wise and going forward.

Deebo won't be available. The other 3 might because of money and those teams need picks.

Show me Scary Terry!

I would just hope that it’s someone who isn’t going to need a brand new contract in the next year.

AJ Brown is going to break the bank. He's going to get big money. There's no way it's him.

And define top WR. Watch it be Shenault. LMAO

Titans wouldn't send him here anyway. IF that report isn't complete bullshit it's one of those 3 or the definition of a "top WR" is a lot more broad than I thought.

Precisely.

I don't think it's any of those guys... without looking at their current contracts, I would imagine those guys would require a new deal. Which would beg the question - why go that route (give up multiple picks and a big salary) if you tried avoiding that with Hill?

Exactly.

Anyone we'd be considering a "Top WR" is going to be getting $20M a season on their next deal.

Michael Pittman may be a name to look out for here if they are actually trying to build a group with size.

Also helps with the colts/Ballard connection.

I 100% expect a Shenault type guy. More than likely a WR they were high on who was drafted by a GM who is no longer in power.

Yeah, doesn't make much sense to turn around and trade for some B-lister who will need a new contract within the next year or so. If we're going to do that, we may as well have kept Hill.

That said, I'd jizz for McLaurin in this offense.

Depends on what you're giving up and what the salary is.

We were willing to pay Tyreek a shit-ton of money.

For the right guy, I'm not against using some picks to get younger and cheaper while waiting on a rookie WR to get up to speed.

McLaurin for example, would be cheaper but not younger.

I agree. I doubt we are getting a top WR in a trade.

Yep and why Cooks or Lockett makes the most sense.

I don’t think McLaurin would get $20 million a season on his next deal.

Not sure why Washington would trade him though. If you could get him for #50 though? Sure.

Brandon Aiyuk?

Doesnt Lockett get really expensive after this year?

If we give up picks and pay a WR 20 mil plus when we could
Ve kept Tyreek imma be pissed

That actually makes sense to me. He was known as a dog house guy in SF last year for not working hard enough in practice. I could see him or Shenault maybe a Mooney. They just had a turnover and Poles might want more picks to make a stamp on the roster.

I would take him if they were reasonable on the pick. He just been screwed by his QB. Hill will know that feeling soon.

I’d love that just so I can say “bitch” a whole bunch whenever we talk about him

Anyone they trade for is gonna need a new contract. Thats the way it goes. They aren't gonna trade for a guy without it being in place.

Maybe Kadarius Toney in a Bradberry combo trade?

You mean like they did with Orlando Brown?

Thats a pretty unique situation and not one I'd repeat. Wouldn't make sense.

And Frank Clark

See above post

I wound give up 1st and #50 for McLaurin, he’s hands down my NFL player next to Mahomes. We have to be aggressive lol. Lesssss goooooo

I'm going to be pissed if it involves the 1st round picks

McLaurin isn’t going to take what Adams or Hill took.

It would depend on the WR. If its an actual guy who can be of first round or better value i dont mind. If its a Frank Clark banking on him to get even better **** that.

Unless it's like the OBJ trade where they get back draft picks in addition to the player, I agree.