ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Rashee Rice Injury Watch [LCL surgery done, out ~4+ months] (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=355218)

penguinz 10-03-2024 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 17724314)
MRI's ARE 100% accurate it's the READING of the person looking at the MRI, you f'n dope.

Also for the people saying or even quoting a doctor saying the swelling interferes with the MRI that is BULLSHIT.

It actually gives contrast to the ligaments, swelling doesn't do shit to interfere with it.

It is WILD to me as a dude that has to look at this shit that there's supposed doctors on Twitter talking about it as clueless as they are.

Swelling and edema and non-contractile elements are seen on the MRI as such. They do not interfere with looking at the muscle, the architecture of it or the tendons and ligaments.

**** I can't read that dumb shit one more time.

Your and idiot.

Quote:

Results
For detecting the specific injured structures in MLKIs, MRI had high sensitivity (90.7% for ACL, 90.4% for PCL, and moderate specificity (63.6% for ACL, 50% for PCL) in detecting cruciate ligament injuries, moderate sensitivity (79.1% for MCL, 55.6% for LCL) and specificity (46.7% for MCL, 68.4% for LCL) in detecting collateral ligament injuries, fair sensitivity (61.5%) and low specificity (39.4%) in the diagnosis of injuries to the meniscus. For classifying the MIKIs, MRI had a moderate agreement with intraoperative findings in classifying KD-V (kappa value = 0.57), poor agreement in the KD-I (kappa value = 0.39) and KD-IIIM (kappa value = 0.31), meaningless in the KD-II and KD-IIIL (kappa value < 0). The overall agreement between MRI and intraoperative findings in classifying MLKIs was poor (kappa value = 0.23).

Conclusions
MRI is valuable in early detection and diagnosis of acute MLKIs, however, the accuracy of MRI in classifying MLKIs is limited. The management of MLKIs should be based on intraoperative findings, physical examinations, and comprehensive imaging results.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756613/

Hammock Parties 10-03-2024 02:00 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">With all of the info we have, my best guess on Rashee Rice is:<br><br>-Partial ACL that may/may not need surgery<br>-Posterolateral Corner sprain/tear that may/may not need surgery<br><br>I still lean towards a significant amount of time missed vs a 2-4 week window, but we’ll see. <a href="https://t.co/hpJujs38Qm">https://t.co/hpJujs38Qm</a></p>&mdash; Jeff Mueller, PT, DPT (@jmthrivept) <a href="https://twitter.com/jmthrivept/status/1841892752218534371?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

KCwolf 10-03-2024 02:03 PM

https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1841928606777221129

LagunaSWana 10-03-2024 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17724580)
BLT sounds good but all I have is bacon and mayo

On what planet would that not be enough?

In58men 10-03-2024 02:12 PM

Is it out 4 games or 4 weeks because we have a bye next week?

wazu 10-03-2024 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCwolf (Post 17724626)

Lemme help you with that.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs now have placed wide receiver Rashee Rice on injured reserve, meaning he’s out a minimum of four games.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1841928606777221129?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Third Eye 10-03-2024 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17724649)
Is it out 4 games or 4 weeks because we have a bye next week?

Pretty sure it is 4 games.

From 2022:

"Players designated for return from the reserve/injured or reserve/non-football injury/illness list are eligible to come back after "four games have elapsed since the date he was placed on the applicable reserve list," per the memo obtained by Garafolo."

https://www.nfl.com/news/players-now...ter-four-games

pugsnotdrugs19 10-03-2024 02:15 PM

yip it's games

But hell, this team loves to slow play their injuries during the RS and even IF he could come back in 4 weeks, they will probably take 6-8 to throw him back out there.

smithandrew051 10-03-2024 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Third Eye (Post 17724656)
Pretty sure it is 4 games.

It is. The player must miss 4 games minimum.

In58men 10-03-2024 02:16 PM

Thanks fellas

smithandrew051 10-03-2024 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17724661)
yip it's games

But hell, this team loves to slow play their injuries during the RS and even IF he could come back in 4 weeks, they will probably take 6-8 to throw him back out there.

If he comes back at all this year and plays well, then it’s a huge win

KC Shox 10-03-2024 02:19 PM

Video of his momma being a porch pirate. lol. This family.

In58men 10-03-2024 02:21 PM

I’m thinking just a very bad knee hyperextension.

wazu 10-03-2024 02:26 PM

Just looking at the IR rules for the NFL and learned that apparently starting in 2024, even if you are on the "season ending" IR list, you are eligible to come back for the playoffs.

Should we read it as significant good news that the Chiefs are putting him on the 4 week IR list? Isn't there a limited number of spots they can use for that? Thought it was a kind of low number, but not finding anything about it online. Might be a rule that changed.

tyecopeland 10-03-2024 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 17724691)
Just looking at the IR rules for the NFL and learned that apparently starting in 2024, even if you are on the "season ending" IR list, you are eligible to come back for the playoffs.

Should we read it as significant good news that the Chiefs are putting him on the 4 week IR list? Isn't there a limited number of spots they can use for that? Thought it was a kind of low number, but not finding anything about it online. Might be a rule that changed.

I believe it is 8 this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.