![]() |
Quote:
He's just as volatile and risky long-term as Ervin Santana. Which might land both guys back in the cities in which they played last year. Royals would have to move some payroll around to do it, but... |
|
Quote:
http://m.mlb.com/video/v31329453/thi...40203_17988424 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And am I the only one that looks for the dude giving the double fisted bird every time they show a shot of the crowd? |
Quote:
Also, that line over 'ROYAL' isn't tilted on the same axis as the word...and that bothers me. I'm anal, since it's my job, but c'mon man. |
Video has me pumped.
|
Be Royally screwed
:( |
Video worked. Got me pumped! Can't wait to take my little girl out to Kauffman for her first games this year!
|
Want to take a walk? Nope, being Royal.
|
Optimism running high, as it always does in February.
|
Just posted this on the Royals scout board, and too much research was involved to not share.
Background: Discussion of catching up to Detroit. Why do the Royals have a better shot than you might think? This is the likely lineup: Austin Jackson (career numbers show he is a .280/.340/.420 type leadoff guy... very similar to Aoki) Ian Kinsler (Career .263/.317/.418 player away from Ballpark in Arlington) Miguel Cabrera Victor Martinez (still a stud, but not a huge HR threat anymore and carries injury issues around) Torii Hunter (also still a stud, but 39 and holding off father time) Alex Avila (has been below average hitter in 3 of 4 full seasons) Nick Castellanos (rookie projected to be a .260/15 hitter, likely with slightly below average D at 3B) Jose Iglesias (hit .303 as a rookie, surprising everyone, based on a .356 BABIP his history suggests is NOT sustainable) Andy Dirks/Rajai Davis platoon (I actually like this platoon a lot. Very strong duo.) That lineup is not nearly as deep or as productive as it was a year ago. Just no way they don't take a step back there. Then you get to the rotation. Which lost a key contributor (Fister) and is replacing him with a talented question mark (Smyly) and still contains the enigmatic Rick Hoche... Porcello. Who showed a good K rate in 2013 for the first time (7.22/9 after a career spent as a 5/9 guy) and still was no more than a solid No. 5 starter. And finally, the big 3. Scherzer and Sanchez both had the best years of their career in 2013. It's possible they have both figured things out and taken them to the next level, but it's more likely they simply had career seasons and will come back down to their normal performance level a little bit. Scherzer, for example, posted a .259 BABIP, a figure that is a little more than 20 percent lower than his career BABIP entering the season. The only other peripheral of Scherzer's that showed significant change in performance in 2013 was his Hits Allowed. Looks like a BABIP blip that will probably correct itself this year, to me. Anibal Sanchez had a very fine year. He reached a record high K rate and saw his HR/FB rate cut nearly in half. All other peripherals basically in line... he just gave up 9 HR instead of the 20 he had the two previous seasons. Normalize the HR, and you're talking about a half point on his ERA right there, and probably a little bit more (as those likely would not all be solo shots). And then there's Verlander. He wasn't quite himself in 2013 and likely takes a step back towards normal Verlander in 2014... but overall, the Tigers LIKELY get less from these three than was received in 2013. |
One solid starter away from overtaking DET
|
Quote:
Aoki - .356 Infante - .345 Hosmer - .353 Butler - .374 Gordon - .327 (lowest of his career... career .344 guy) Would not be shocked to see that group run off .355/.330/.375/.375/.350 as a group. Which would make this, likely, at least an average team in terms of drawing walks. Been a long time since that was the case in KC. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.