![]() |
Quote:
Both schools have built premiere basketball programs. If KU’s goal is simply to maintain their top level basketball program they could probably achieve that outside of a power conference. |
Quote:
I don't see anything happening fast for KU unless the ACC or P12 feels like they have to move fast. The B1G can wait and see what their next move is because they are a clear #2 in the pecking order. If I were them, I'd be considering, like you said "bigger and bolder" than KU. KU can always be a back up plan, and if they miss on them, they're really not out anything. If I were the B1G I'd be looking at USC/UCLA/Washington/Oregon or raiding the ACC before I'd move on the B12 leftovers. You're falling further behind the SEC if you add KU or ISU or anyone else in response to OU/UT. |
Quote:
agree though - BIG hoops is horrible to watch.....and even worse is BIG refs. |
With UT and OU gone, I'd imagine the B12 will dissolve within a few years. If KU can't hook on with a major football conference in the years to come, just create a conference with some of the other top basketball schools. At least that would be interesting to watch.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What’s new? SEC added Mizzou & TAMU while the Big Ten added Nebraska & Rutgers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The sticklers were conference stability in the B12 and the LHN. Not an issue in the SEC. Texas will absolutely have to lose the LHN, SEC is going nowhere. It will have a bonus of hilarity when Bevo tries to pull its weight in the conference and gets deep dicked by an Elephant. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.