ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

Saul Good 12-03-2011 12:48 PM

I don't know if this is true or not, but I'm inclined to believe that it's a likely scenario even if Mongo is just making it up. I don't see any reason that Texas would want to stay in the Big IIX.

If this does go down, the ACC phone lines will be blowing up with desperate leftover teams.

Saul Good 12-03-2011 12:48 PM

I don't know if this is true or not, but I'm inclined to believe that it's a likely scenario even if Mongo is just making it up. I don't see any reason that Texas would want to stay in the Big IIX.

If this does go down, the ACC phone lines will be blowing up with desperate leftover teams.

duncan_idaho 12-03-2011 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8163451)

That article asserts that all 10 Big IIX teams had signed the grant of rights at the point, but it was posted on November 2 - before Missouri's move to the SEC was announced.

It has been clearly stated by Missouri officials that Mizzou never granted its rights to the Big 12. That means this blog is inaccurate in that at least. What else is wrong? Hard to say how many teams actually signed the grant of rights.

kstater 12-03-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 8163467)
That article asserts that all 10 Big IIX teams had signed the grant of rights at the point, but it was posted on November 2 - before Missouri's move to the SEC was announced.

It has been clearly stated by Missouri officials that Mizzou never granted its rights to the Big 12. That means this blog is inaccurate in that at least. What else is wrong? Hard to say how many teams actually signed the grant of rights.

It was referring to 9 and 10 being TCU and WVU. Which, as of the meeting on Nov 1, had both been accepted and signed over rights on the day of that article.

I'll bow out of this thread while I watch KSU do their part to win a share of something Missouri hasn't done in 40 years.

DeezNutz 12-03-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8163469)
It was referring to 9 and 10 being TCU and WVU. Which, as of the meeting on Nov 1, had both been accepted and signed over rights on the day of that article.

I'll bow out of this thread while I watch KSU do their part to win a share of something Missouri hasn't done in 40 years.

KSU has had a great year, no question. But it will have to be meaningful in the short term for KSU to "share" a conference title with the two teams that beat the Wildcats during conference play.

Clearly, you're on par with OSU and OU this year.

eazyb81 12-03-2011 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8163437)
I'm not making any judgements about that poster. I'm making judgments about your logic.

Can we assume that TTRaider (as in T[exas]T[ech][Red]R[aider]) is getting his historically-reliable inside info because he has connections inside Texas Tech? It seems likely. If so, then you shouldn't then also claim that Texas Tech is "just along for the ride," lacking knowledge of "behind the scenes" goings-on.

I think it is a mistake to assume he is a Texas Tech insider or even fan just because of his handle. If someone has legit inside info, they are likely to be very careful to not leak their true identity.

How would a Texas Tech insider have such accurate info on Mizzou's move to the SEC, including dates of when Mizzou when hold a press conference? Why would a Tech insider only post this info on a Mizzou board? That doesn't make any sense. TTRaider could just as easily be a higher-up at Mizzou or Texas.

duncan_idaho 12-03-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8163469)
I'll bow out of this thread while I watch KSU do their part to win a share of something Missouri hasn't done in 40 years.

Enjoy the Moutain West/CUSA.

LiveSteam 12-03-2011 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8163469)
I'll bow out of this thread while I watch KSU do their part to win a share of something Missouri hasn't done in 40 years.

Did you enjoy that sack

duncan_idaho 12-03-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 8163504)
Did you enjoy that sack

Probably about as much as he enjoyed that TD pass.

Bowser 12-03-2011 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 8163469)

I'll bow out of this thread while I watch KSU do their part to win a share of something Missouri hasn't done in 40 years.

You mean give a shit what a pissed off K-State fan thinks? *high fives Mizzou fans*

Reaper16 12-03-2011 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8163480)
I think it is a mistake to assume he is a Texas Tech insider or even fan just because of his handle. If someone has legit inside info, they are likely to be very careful to not leak their true identity.

How would a Texas Tech insider have such accurate info on Mizzou's move to the SEC, including dates of when Mizzou when hold a press conference? Why would a Tech insider only post this info on a Mizzou board? That doesn't make any sense. TTRaider could just as easily be a higher-up at Mizzou or Texas.

That's reasonable.

Saul Good 12-03-2011 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8163612)
That's reasonable.

Agreed. I'd put more stock into his posting history than his user name.

Mr. Plow 12-03-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8163454)
I don't know if this is true or not, but I'm inclined to believe that it's a likely scenario even if Mongo is just making it up. I don't see any reason that Texas would want to stay in the Big IIX.

If this does go down, the ACC phone lines will be blowing up with desperate leftover teams.


Wait, I thought Texas wanted to stay in the Big 12 because everyone in the conference did whatever Texas wanted them to do?

Saul Good 12-03-2011 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8163775)
Wait, I thought Texas wanted to stay in the Big 12 because everyone in the conference did whatever Texas wanted them to do?

It's not so great having crappy teams that bring no value doing your bidding. Without Denver, Omaha, Kansas City, Saint Louis, and the aTm fanbase, it's not the same.

Mr. Plow 12-03-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8163783)
It's not so great having crappy teams that bring no value doing your bidding. Without Denver, Omaha, Kansas City, Saint Louis, and the aTm fanbase, it's not the same.

That's probably true. I've always thought Texas wanted to be the "big dog" in the conference - not sure that be that going to Pac 12.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.