![]() |
Quote:
|
Yeah, almost blowing a 27 point lead to the worst offense in the 21st century still pisses me off just as badly as it did last night.
|
Quote:
|
I don’t think the scheme works in todays NFL. Frankly, I’d love to see Reid walk into the sunset this off season and overhaul the coaching staff. If Reid stays he should replace Spags.
|
Quote:
|
I'm far from a Spags fan but if he's just coaching, I don't see what much he can do. We can't get pressure unless we blitz. When we blitz, we leave a young secondary vulnerable. Double edged sword.
Now if he's the one telling Veach, "these are the players I'd like to run my preferred scheme" and Veach is just shopping for him according to his wishes, yeah he has to go. We desperately need speed on the D-line. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Please sterilize yourself with a rusty butter knife. |
Quote:
But I do think Spags does have a hand in getting the players he prefers on the DL. And yeah the days of those types of players being big impact are kind of over. You need some finesse and speed to consistently win in today's game. |
The defense hasn’t been talented at every level since the 2019 playoffs.
They’re better at corner and LB overall IMO but the lack of pass rush is killing us |
Quote:
That said, there needs to be some improvement with our pass rush... it's pretty awful against decent QB's. |
Word this morning was there was a lot of anger and yellig on the defensive sideline.....a coach v. player type thing.....anyone catch any of that on tv? I didn't see it
|
Quote:
Indy Titans Bucs regular season game a couple years ago Cinci 3 twice Spags on the other hand has a tendency to not be able to close teams out. We gave up a 2nd and 34 yesterday to the worst offense in football. We constantly are giving up 3rd and longs. And that has been a hallmark of this defense for quite some time. Outside of a DPI or Hold or something, you should never, ever straight give up a 2nd and 34. EVER! |
Depends if we continue to regress. Chiefs won the Superbowl in 2020, got beat badly in 2021, then got beat in the AFC Championship game by blowing a big lead where we should've won. This year is still a question mark, but it shows we haven't learned from our mistakes the last two weeks, once against a team that seemingly has our number, and the other that inexplicably we allowed to almost come back from 27 down and got outscored 28-7 in pretty much the second half of the game, which is something we usually do to the opponent, not vise versa.
Unfortunately with the success we've had the expectations are going to remain high, but if you lose in the divisional round, or worse the wildcard, and don't make it to the AFC Championship game this year, that's a small but important regression. I hope they make the AFC Championship game this year if not the Superbowl, but if they don't, you have to remove Spags to try and improve the defense next year. Since nobody wants to take Bieniemy you'll have to remove him too and promote Nagy in the offseason, which will get flak from some for the politics of it all, but you can't continue to allow that to be the reason if it's not working. Replacing Spags and Bieniemy won't happen given Reid's penchant for loyalty, but it should happen. If your coordinators are only good enough to get you to the same level every year, but not good enough to get promoted off your staff, then eventually you'll need to make that change. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would say that Spags should be given one more season and allow Veach to address the Dline like he has other position groups. A lack of a consistent pass rush (outside Jones) would make any Defensive Coordinator look bad.
|
Yeah, I mean it's all "FIRE SPAGS" but like...what would you do different?
don't blitz? Ok, well, you're going to get picked apart because we flat can't get there with 4. Do blitz? Ok, well, you're risking a lot, with an extremely young secondary. Play zone? Well, that was the first half against Cincinnati. Didn't look like that works too well against the elite QB's if you can't get to them with 4, they'll just wait for someone to find a hole in the zone. Play man? Well, ok, but then Russell Wilson runs for 50 yards because your defenders are running with the receivers and have their backs to the line. I mean, this is nuts. Lots of criticism, no answers. We can't get to the QB with 4. All issues stem from that. It would make ANY defensive coordinator look bad. |
There's no part of me that would feel confident another DC would clearly get more out of our very young defense at this point.
I absolutely am not convinced that the grass is greener. Give the guy more time with a group that's still growing. |
Quote:
Spags isn't going to reinvent himself again. If we are keeping him we need better pass-rush and an elite safety next year, otherwise just pick a guy that specializes in running shell coverages. |
Quote:
Players enjoy/respect playing for him, and that is huge. |
Quote:
that shit works if you can get pressure with 4, PERIOD. You guys that think there's some defensive scheme that solves everything regardless of talent are batshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If Mahomes doesn't throw 3 picks, we're not even having this conversation.
People need to calm the **** down. |
Quote:
It was as bad as it appeared. |
Quote:
|
I'm sorry, I just have to say this about all this "shell coverage" "Fangio is a genius, we should run that scheme" shit.
That scheme is not new. It's old. It's as old as the forward ****ing pass. It's not special. It's not some kind of cheat code. IF and it's a big IF: you can successfully rush the passer with 4, then you can sit back in coverage with 7, taking away the big play and clog passing lanes. If you CANNOT rush with 4, you will look very, very bad. The reason it works against the Mahomes/Allen/Burrows of the league is because those defenses running it well can all get rush the passer with 4. You want the defensive cheatcode? Have 4 pass rushers that can win one on ones consistently. That's it. That's the whole ****ing thing. If you don't have that, then you have to live and die by the blitz, like Kansas City does. It's that simple, and everything else is nonsense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They scored TDs each time not FGs. He nearly cost us the game. Kelce cost us last week and Patrick damn near did yesterday. I almost feel that he sometimes thinks he is invincible and ANY mistake can be overcome. I still wouldn't trade him for all the tea in China. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The death of this team will be pass rush. Wasn't horrible but it needs to be addressed next year.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-F711U1 using Tapatalk |
Just don’t get out to a big lead and this defense is fine.
|
the floor for this defense is giving up 27-29 points this year
that isn't great, but if the floor gives mahomes a chance to win, i'm not that worried |
Quote:
I agree we gotta put the pressure on. I think he gets some grace for having a team this young. But I just think people are revising history about how spags has costed us much of anything yet. Or that we have no reason for optimism that he can turn things around for the playoffs. |
Quote:
The floor is not 27-29. |
Quote:
|
The worst part about his d is his reluctance to use speed defensive ends
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mike Danna and Frank Clark are our speed rushers LMAO
|
Quote:
The secondary was trash, Hitchens and Neimann had to be replaced and our DL outside of Chris Jones was bad. We hadn’t drafted a 1st rd defender since Marcus Peters. That’s 6 years without premier young talent from the first rd. And boy did they sure look like it last year. We were an old defense that needed a reset. I get that people are pissed about the pass rush but we cannot fix every single problem in one offseason. This was never a one year fix. But this off-season money will open up and I expect us to attack the pass rush. |
Having Mahomes with no pass rush is a double edged sword. We can get up big but when the other team is forced to pass....we can't consistently put pressure on them.
|
Quote:
|
You hear a lot from the talking heads on TV that the Chiefs routinely put their corners in challenging situations (Dan Orlovsky mentioned it this morning for example).
Is this referring to the Chiefs putting their corners in a lot of one on one man coverage? It seems like we’ve seen several instances of soft zone coverage this year. The Chiefs have seemingly had communication issues and coverage breakdowns (especially in goal line situations) both last year with a more veteran secondary and this year with rookies/younger players so is the scheme the problem? |
Quote:
We could do a lot worse than Spags but I also think there are people available who would do better. |
We have a pass rush problem but are at 42 sacks and on pace for 55.
6 sacks and 11 QB hits yesterday. A causal fan looking at boxscore stats would think we’re elite LMAO |
DEN had 13 drives yesterday. 7 ended with punts. 2 ended with INTs by the KC defense.
DEN scored on four drives. Three of which occurred within less than 20 minutes and accounted for 34 snaps, essentially back to back with little to no rest. The average length of drive for the other 9 DEN drives was 8.1 yards per drive. |
Quote:
Its not just casual fans there was a bunch of dipshits bragging about the Defense in the GDT yestderday vs the shittiest offense if football |
Quote:
|
Specializes in running shell coverages ROFL
|
Quote:
|
I feel like Spags' job is to make chicken soup out of some good chicken parts with some chicken shit added in. He needs less shit and more chicken.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Bengals are flashing all over the place, in an organized way, could be cover-0, could be rush 3 with a spy - you really can't tell until the snap. They seem to be doing a ton of complicated crap and they're always moving around, yet still know exactly where they're supposed to be, and I suspect confusing Mahomes with it. Our D maybe threatens one extra rusher sometimes. But other than that they seem to just mostly sit there looking lifeless as they wait for the snap. Maybe there's good reasons why we can't do what the Bengals are doing. But to my layman eye, if I was on offense, I'd rather play against the Chiefs. |
Quote:
But overall the Chiefs defense hasn't been good in the RZ. I think one of the worst this season. But I just can't put all the blame on the defense for yesterday's debacle in the 2nd and 3rd quarters. They were on the field for 34+ snaps with almost no rest. I mean, come on. That's three 10-12 play drives back-to-back-to-back. Any defense is going to get tired about halfway through that. For example, the DAL defense were put in a similar situation vs. HOU. Their ST and offense turned the ball over twice in short order, and HOU scored a pair of TDs from less than 30 yards out. One of the best defenses in the league, if not the best defense, allowed a pair of TDs against the worst offense in the league. And no one's calling for the DAL DC's head today. Add in the fact that the secondary is still learning and still having issues with communication, well, it wasn't shocking that they gave up a couple plays. But if the Chiefs offense doesn't put our defense in that situation, and at least force DEN to drive 65+ yards, I seriously doubt they score three TDs. In fact, their season stats and probability says they only score 19 points at most. They were gifted great field position three times by Mahomes and got a little lucky. |
Quote:
|
I'm not quite understanding how a defensive scheme that Spags claims is supposed to thrive with the lead continually gives up points in the way they do with the lead. They have drafted players, thrown money at veteran free agents, they have moved and replaced most of the position coaches. And still the same bottom 15 defense is always the result. At some point you homers are going to have to admit that Spags system has grown stale and is no longer a reliable defensive scheme. No matter how many new players you keep throwing at it. It's broken, and so is Spags.
Turnovers aside. Mahomes needs to keep firing. Period. Could you imagine him being gun shy on the 1st TD to McKinnon? How many QB's just tuck it in and take the loss of yards in the situation? Easily the majority of them tuck it. And you have to think even the QB's who don't, do any of them have the abilities of Mahomes to actually pull it off? Pfft. Keep firing Patrick/ Defense ****ing sucks, period. From the man running the scheme on down to the homers that are too blind to see it. |
The Cowboys great D gave up 23 to the ****ing Texans who were missing both of their starting WRs.
Welcome to the NFL. |
Quote:
I'll be honest, I was getting pissed yesterday because I know they are capable of way more. I also think that we kept it pretty vanilla, and I said as much in the game day thread. No need to give away good shit against the Donks. I believed in them before, I'm sticking with it. Every team goes through some rough runs. |
a week before christmas we can expect some quit in the texans
|
I don't know if I'd count on that from the team that almost beat the Cowboys in Dallas.
|
Quote:
Throwing back-to-back picks in an NFL game is almost always a loss. Mahomes has to dial back the gunslinger stuff a bit, and he knows it. Though that one pick by Surtain was just ridiculous. That was just lucky. |
Quote:
We should breath a sigh of relief now. stalory has brought us reason and insanity. Davis Mills will not have career day! |
If Pat methodically drives the ball down and scores a TD before half, most of you aren't bitching.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Scheme is supposed to thrive with the lead. They had a 27-0 lead to the worst offense in football. Damn near gave it up. The TD drives of Denver were 42yds, 60yds, 75yds and 75yds. Not exactly short drives there. 4 td's to the worst offense in football. Defense sucks, period. Spags scheme puts fear in no team. It's stale, old unreliable and ineffective. And you think that you will be facing the likes of a washed up Russell Wilson or Nobody Rypien in the playoffs? With this defense Mahomes won't have no choice but to keep firing. You can barely even see the TV anyway. Go back to your mashed taters and gravy old man. ;) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.