ChiefsPlanet
Page 52 of 63 « First 24248495051 52 5354555662 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   All alex all the time (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307712)

Rivermike87 07-22-2017 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12967916)
ROFL 3 games in his how many years?

Shut the **** up.
To be fair he only gave certain examples although smith did have some pretty impressive games last year and balled out: San Diego comeback, Oakland Thursday night and the Sunday night against Denver was really imprsssive.

Haters will hate on Alex regardless and don't give him credit when due

Hammock Parties 07-22-2017 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivermike87 (Post 12967934)
Smith did have some pretty impressive games last year and balled out...Oakland Thursday night and the Sunday night against Denver was really impressive.
That's the trouble with Alex and his pack of sycophants...they think a 224 yard, 0 TD performance (1st Raiders game) or a 264-yard, 1 TD/1 INT game in which the offense scores a whopping 14 points (2nd Raiders game), or a 244-yard, 1 TD/1 INT performance is "balling out."

When that's the high water mark for your QB it's time to move on....Smith averaged less than 10 yards per completion in one of those games...that's bush league, son.

Rivermike87 07-22-2017 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12967936)
That's the trouble with Alex and his pack of sycophants...they think a 224 yard, 0 TD performance (1st Raiders game) or a 264-yard, 1 TD/1 INT game in which the offense scores a whopping 14 points (2nd Raiders game), or a 244-yard, 1 TD/1 INT performance is "balling out."

When that's the high water mark for your QB it's time to move on....Smith averaged less than 10 yards per completion in one of those games...that's bush league, son.
Well he helped the team win right, or would you rather have a qb like newton who can throw for 300 yards a game but only win 6 games a year? Oh that's right this is Kansas City where winning 6 games a year is the norm

My point is just be happy that Kansas City is a perennial winner now because it may never come again especially for Kansas City

Hammock Parties 07-22-2017 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivermike87 (Post 12967942)
My point is just be happy that Kansas City is a perennial winner now because it may never come again especially for Kansas City
So stick with Alex, eh? ROFL

Sorry, Chiefs are moving on despite his "balling out."

SAUTO 07-22-2017 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivermike87 (Post 12967942)
Well he helped the team win right, or would you rather have a qb like newton who can throw for 300 yards a game but only win 6 games a year? Oh that's right this is Kansas City where winning 6 games a year is the norm

My point is just be happy that Kansas City is a perennial winner now because it may never come again especially for Kansas City
Wasn't Newton playing in a ****ing super bowl the year before last?

Terrible comparison.

Bowser 07-22-2017 10:42 AM
GREAT SEATS STILL AVAILABLE

Hammock Parties 07-22-2017 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12967947)
Wasn't Newton playing in a ****ing super bowl the year before last?

Terrible comparison.
Alexsexuals have no sense of history.

Wins/TDs in first six years:

Newton: 51/184
Smith: 19/53

Smith will retire with two playoff wins to his name...Cam already has three. LMAO

PAChiefsGuy 07-22-2017 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12967936)
That's the trouble with Alex and his pack of sycophants...they think a 224 yard, 0 TD performance (1st Raiders game) or a 264-yard, 1 TD/1 INT game in which the offense scores a whopping 14 points (2nd Raiders game), or a 244-yard, 1 TD/1 INT performance is "balling out."

When that's the high water mark for your QB it's time to move on....Smith averaged less than 10 yards per completion in one of those games...that's bush league, son.
We won both those games so I could careless what type of numbers Alex Smith put up. We won the game, he did his job.

The object in football is to score more pts than the other team not have a good fantasy football QB.

Hammock Parties 07-22-2017 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12967959)
The object in football is to score more pts than the other team not have a good fantasy football QB.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2013...no-blog480.jpg

RunKC 07-22-2017 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12967872)
Got what had been a crap organization (2-14 record the year before he came here) their first playoff win in 21-yrs I'd say that is quite an achievement no matter how the Alex Smith haters try to spin it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O10j-ztQTps
It's sad that fans think this is such a great achievement. It's like their super bowl.

I guess no success for so long has molded this type of thinking into their DNA.

Rasputin 07-22-2017 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12967797)
Because Smith didn't ball out against the saints, Indy, or new England. The Saints game winning td and his bootlegTD isn't clutch? Most 49ers fans I've talked to said that was the greatest game they had ever seen. Excellent 'journalism'...

Mouth breathing morons strike again
This explains a lot you're all still in high school and haven't got to watch much football. I'm sure you've heard of him but you should've seen what Joe Montana did back in the day.

BigCatDaddy 07-22-2017 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 12967975)
This explains a lot you're all still in high school and haven't got to watch much football. I'm sure you've heard of him but you should've seen what Joe Montana did back in the day.
That Young feller wasn't bad either

threebag 07-22-2017 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12967789)
Can't wait for the day when all the Alex talk will come to an end.
I will make sure this doesn't happen

threebag 07-22-2017 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12967861)
1-3....
Number of brain cells you have

Discuss Thrower 07-22-2017 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12967947)
Wasn't Newton playing in a ****ing super bowl the year before last?

Terrible comparison.
Cam Newton... who's two best receiving options that year were Greg 'Third-leg' Olsen and Ted Ginn.


Let that sink in.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.
Page 52 of 63 « First 24248495051 52 5354555662 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.