So you can accept Sorter's evaluation or not. It's that simple. If you want to waste words white knighting a yeast infection posing as a football fan you're on your own. I and many have already closed this case...

Probably

Stroking to a fresh Smith INT gif - since there had only been 5 this year, they're hard to come by. Rooting for the Donks no doubt. Just another Sunday for that turd.

This is the part where you give specifics.

don't sweat it guys... no big deal.

Just wanted to know which particular football takes make me so awful... but vague and insulting is apparently all the mighty Sorter can lower himself to offer.

it's all good. I take shit for years here, and am not going anywhere.. so go nuts.

Nobody outside of Baby Lee's imagination is comparing anyone's football takes to Sorter's.

You're a ****ing moron

Sorter judged sandy's takes to be of very low quality.
Sandy said that's not true.
Therefore the question isn't whosetakes are better. The question is whoseevaluation of the quality of takes do you side with.

See how that works? Perhaps if I phrased it in a TV Guide-like format?

That's not how it works.

First off, you said no one [but me, apparently, . . . but no] were comparing Sorter and Sandy, . . . right after comparing Sorter and Sandy.

But Sorter didn't say 'you're not as good as me.' Sorter said 'you're a ****ing moron.' And Sandy didn't even say she WASN'T. She just asked for the basis for that allegation.

So now, it's incumbent on those making charges to provide evidence to substantiate.

Kind of like how I established that you are in fact a ****ing moron with your own words.

THAT'S how it works.

Yet you continue to make post after post in this thread.

Then you should patiently wait for the accusers reply. Once he does you can dispute that with Sorter. Although probably not something you will or want to do.

And if I choose to make more I will. Anything else I can help you with?

thanks Kelce... JFC

Again you fail to comprehend.
Your post is a rerun. Set dvr for original programming only. Now we pause for station identification...

I'm responding to vailpass, who takes allegations absent evidence as unimpeachable fact.

OIC, you're drunk. My bad. :toast: