![]() |
Teicher claims the Chiefs were absolutely going to draft Lynch, but weren't going to trade up for him, since they lacked ammo due to tampering.
This is such a gut punch for me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Such drama in this thread. It's like watching the GOP attack each other...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If true, it confirms the Chiefs are looking hard at finding a young replacement for Smith to start in a couple of years. Don't know if there are any QB's coming out next year worth drafting early, but if there are, we'll be interested... |
Quote:
|
Also worth noting, according to that article it was the Chiefs that called the Cowboys.
It's clear as day that Dorsey desperately wanted to trade down and make up for that 3rd rounder and/or have more picks in a deep draft. |
Quote:
Dorsey has had his picks and he stayed put that year and It netted us Marcus Peters, so I'm good with that. Next year we have a 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6. Next year is the year to use that ammo and get a QB. |
Quote:
Is that after losing one from the tampering penalty? Also, where's our 7th? |
Quote:
1 2 3 3-Sean Smith 4 4-Chase Daniel 5 6-Donald Stephenson 6-Tyvonn Branch 7 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Of course the Chiefs didn't want Lynch. Why would anyone think otherwise?
|
KC's interest in Lynch makes no sense...he has never played in a pro-style offense and is, supposedly, terrible at reading the entire field. He is the exact opposite of the QB they drafted out of Stanford. It's post-draft rumor bullshit...
I'm glad they didn't draft him...and ever happier Denver did. He's a late 2nd round/3rd QB in a normal year. By the time he see's the field...that defense will be done. The draft picks they gave up would have kept the defense valid. They have Sanchez in a new system and a suspect 0L...what could go wrong? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.