ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Paxton Lynch (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295398)

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-07-2016 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12167818)
What about Connor Cook?

I suspect he'll be wearing Orange next year, for realz. Unless this Kap-thing goes down.

If Elway sees someone he likes, he'll make the move, and why shouldn't he? How many "pressing needs" do the Broncos have?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-07-2016 04:13 PM

Rams are dumb enough to draft him cause they are desperate for a QB. Mayock earlier this year said Lynch is pretty much a project.

staylor26 04-07-2016 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12167816)
Starts at 8 with Doug Pederson and the Eagles. I can absolutely see him being taken by them.

I'm finding it hard to believe the Eagles would take one of the top two QB's, more or less Lynch, at that spot. I know it's just a two year deal, but after paying for Bradford and Chase, I just don't see them going in that direction.

rico 04-07-2016 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12168239)
I'm finding it hard to believe the Eagles would take one of the top two QB's, more or less Lynch, at that spot. I know it's just a two year deal, but after paying for Bradford and Chase, I just don't see them going in that direction.

I agree.

DaneMcCloud 04-07-2016 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12168239)
I'm finding it hard to believe the Eagles would take one of the top two QB's, more or less Lynch, at that spot. I know it's just a two year deal, but after paying for Bradford and Chase, I just don't see them going in that direction.

Bradford is injury prone and Chase is in the cheap. It wouldn't shock me at all if Philly took a QB at #8 because it's unlikely they'll be drafting that high next year.

The only reason why they're in the top ten is due to the Miami trade. Otherwise, they'd be at 13.

Bewbies 04-07-2016 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12167459)
That's amazing... went to profootballreference and pulled it up, that would have been 9/13/1987 - KC vs SD. Wow.

This should help you make sense of why everyone is so QB hungry around here, and why there have been so few playoff wins...

staylor26 04-07-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12168397)
Bradford is injury prone and Chase is in the cheap. It wouldn't shock me at all if Philly took a QB at #8 because it's unlikely they'll be drafting that high next year.

The only reason why they're in the top ten is due to the Miami trade. Otherwise, they'd be at 13.

I wouldn't completely dismiss it as a possibility due to the reasons you stated , but I think it's unlikely.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-07-2016 10:02 PM

https://twitter.com/nfl/status/717757271233564672

On my phone, can't embed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mr_Tomahawk 04-07-2016 10:07 PM

https://twitter.com/nfl/status/717757271233564672

On my phone, can't embed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

staylor26 04-07-2016 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12168692)
https://twitter.com/nfl/status/717757271233564672

On my phone, can't embed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea that a "I'm not making it out of the top 15 throw"

:D

Mile High Mania 04-08-2016 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12168397)
Bradford is injury prone and Chase is in the cheap. It wouldn't shock me at all if Philly took a QB at #8 because it's unlikely they'll be drafting that high next year.

The only reason why they're in the top ten is due to the Miami trade. Otherwise, they'd be at 13.

Combined, the cap number for Bradford and Daniels this year is $17M and in 2017 ... $28M. Damn. Chase is a $5M cap number this year and $8M next year.

Titty Meat 04-08-2016 08:17 AM

Take him if Apple and Jackson are gone

O.city 04-08-2016 06:11 PM

So, if you're gonna take Lynch and have him sit a year or 2, why not take cardale Jones later and let him sit?

Seems to have the highest overall upside of any qb in the drsft from a measurables perspective

staylor26 04-08-2016 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12169706)
So, if you're gonna take Lynch and have him sit a year or 2, why not take cardale Jones later and let him sit?

Seems to have the highest overall upside of any qb in the drsft from a measurables perspective

I love the idea of getting Jones late.

I love the idea of taking Lynch more.

When it comes to Lynch, if we pass on him, I wouldn't be upset because we've definitely done our homework extensively on him and if Dorsey and Reid choose to pass, I will trust their judgement.

But, if we take him, I'd be ecstatic for the same reason. If Dorsey and Reid have the balls to take a QB in round one, it's because they think he can take us to the next level at some point. It wouldn't be out of desperation like a lot of other teams.

O.city 04-08-2016 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12169717)
I love the idea of getting Jones late.

I love the idea of taking Lynch more.

When it comes to Lynch, if we pass on him, I wouldn't be upset because we've definitely done our homework extensively on him and if Dorsey and Reid choose to pass, I will trust their judgement.

But, if we take him, I'd be ecstatic for the same reason. If Dorsey and Reid have the balls to take a QB in round one, it's because they think he can take us to the next level at some point. It wouldn't be out of desperation like a lot of other teams.

Yeah, either way works for me.

But if I could have Alexander or Jackson and jones, I'd rather do that

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-08-2016 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12169706)
So, if you're gonna take Lynch and have him sit a year or 2, why not take cardale Jones later and let him sit?

Seems to have the highest overall upside of any qb in the drsft from a measurables perspective

A lot of good picks to be had this year across multiple rounds. Everyone is looking.

milkman 04-09-2016 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12167483)
Given what I heard from his brother, they weren't looking for a HC that could have the Steelers' type of resume.

All they wanted was to not be the Browns; they don't want to be in a position where firing a coach is a possibility every two-three seasons and don't want to be cycling through QBs.

Whose brother?

Reid, while he has his flaws, provides stability, and that is exactly the Steeler type of resume.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-09-2016 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12167483)
Given what I heard from his brother, they weren't looking for a HC that could have the Steelers' type of resume.

All they wanted was to not be the Browns; they don't want to be in a position where firing a coach is a possibility every two-three seasons and don't want to be cycling through QBs.

Some Steel fans are accusing Tomlin of executing Marty and...wait for it..."Herm-ball".

ROFL Damn, NFL fans are reeruned.

Tombstone RJ 04-09-2016 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12169706)
So, if you're gonna take Lynch and have him sit a year or 2, why not take cardale Jones later and let him sit?

Seems to have the highest overall upside of any qb in the drsft from a measurables perspective

Yep, as a Bronco fan I agree. Why take a developmental QB in the first? Why not take a more raw guy who has lots of upside and let him learn a few years behind the starter? Cardale Jones has all sorts of upside. The fact is the Broncos will draft a QB, the questions are, when and who will the Broncos pick. Lots of pundits say Lynch but I think Lynch will be gone by 31. So the Broncos will have to wait to take a QB. I'd love for them to take a guy like Driskel or a more pro ready guy like Hogan. The Broncos already have their Cardale Jones in Siemian.

SAUTO 04-09-2016 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12170462)
Whose brother?

Reid, while he has his flaws, provides stability, and that is exactly the Steeler type of resume.

He's saying Clark hunts brother Lamar jr. Said that to him

Discuss Thrower 04-09-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12170462)
Whose brother?

Reid, while he has his flaws, provides stability, and that is exactly the Steeler type of resume.

Lamar Jr.

Eleazar 04-10-2016 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12168397)
Bradford is injury prone and Chase is in the cheap. It wouldn't shock me at all if Philly took a QB at #8 because it's unlikely they'll be drafting that high next year.

The only reason why they're in the top ten is due to the Miami trade. Otherwise, they'd be at 13.

Saw a report last night that the saints have been extensively scouting cook and lynch, with Brees now in his final contract year. There are at least three other teams that are QB poor in the top half of the first round too, depending on how you look at it.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-13-2016 07:33 PM

Todd Mcshay and Mel Kiper just agreed that Lynch is the most overrated QB/player in the draft and will be taken too early.

So everyone saying we need to take him in the 1st round...Please get off his nuts already.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2016 07:38 PM

Because kiper and mcshay are draft gods?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-13-2016 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12177313)
Because kiper and mcshay are draft gods?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because he played in a pathetic conference, has a slow release, and didn't have a solid game against a respectable team in all of his college career. The drop off from Goff is almost to the level of 1st round to 5th round. It's that glaring.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2016 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12177320)
Because he played in a pathetic conference, has a slow release, and didn't have a solid game against a respectable team in all of his college career. The drop off from Goff is almost to the level of 1st round to 5th round. It's that glaring.



So Carson Wentz sucks then too?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-13-2016 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12177322)
So Carson Wentz sucks then too?

Wentz isn't part of this discussion.

I'm willing to bet you $50 to this site that Lynch won't put up 2 full seasons as a starter over the next 5 NFL seasons, after which he'll be a 3rd string QB for the Browns. At best, he'll be a .400 win % QB.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-13-2016 07:52 PM

So you're betting he won't start a game in the next 2 seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Franchise 04-13-2016 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12177337)
Wentz isn't part of this discussion.

I'm willing to bet you $50 to this site that Lynch won't be a full time starter for 2 full seasons over the next 5 NFL seasons, after which he'll be a 3rd string QB for the Browns. At best, he'll be a .400 win % QB.

What do I get if I win?

SAUTO 04-13-2016 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12177352)
So you're betting he won't start a game in the next 2 seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually he's betting that in 5 years he's the third qb for the ****ing browns

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-14-2016 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12177301)
Todd Mcshay and Mel Kiper just agreed that Lynch is the most overrated QB/player in the draft and will be taken too early.

So everyone saying we need to take him in the 1st round...Please get off his nuts already.

Chillax, brah. Plenty of "established veterans" and sweet, late-round pile pickins' in your future to look forward to. You're home, Ozzy. No need to call mama.

Eleazar 04-14-2016 05:56 PM

Seems like an Osweiler clone IMO

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-15-2016 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12179073)
Seems like an Osweiler clone IMO

If not worse. Much easier competition than Brock and wasn't impressive with vision, tight throws, touch passes, mobility.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-15-2016 05:45 PM

Yeah, that Osweiler's future looks grim!

Tribal Warfare 04-15-2016 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12180753)
Yeah, that Osweiler's future looks grim!

If anything Lynch reminds me of an in shape( 250 pound version) of Ben Roethlisberger.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-15-2016 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 12180867)
If anything Lynch reminds of an in shape( 250 pound version) of Ben Roethlisberger.

That is one sweet ****ing place to be.

#bennybooprototype

Quesadilla Joe 04-15-2016 08:50 PM

If Wentz and Goff go in the first 2 picks I'd be surprised if Lynch makes it out of the top 10 and shocked if he makes it past 15.

BryanBusby 04-15-2016 09:00 PM

The 49ers are going to ****ing panic when Goff goes at 2 and will shortly regret choosing him at 7.

It's going to be glorious.

BossChief 04-15-2016 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 12181049)
If Wentz and Goff go in the first 2 picks I'd be surprised if Lynch makes it out of the top 10 and shocked if he makes it past 15.

Yup.

Somebody is gonna move up for him.

Honestly, I'd love it if Dorsey moved up using a third or something from next year and took him before Denver can...but I understand either way.

KC spent a ****ton of resources to scout the kid. Scouts at almost every game.

I trust that they know his worth better than anyone.

If we draft him, I'll be ecstatic.

We would get 2 dirt cheap years of him starting...we could probably recoup a second or third for Alex Smith, if we wanted to move him at that point. Lots of teams will be losing their veteran QBs to age in that time span and would love to have another vet step in. Getting a pick for Alex and clearing up that much cap space would be a huge difference maker.

Then Lynch runs the offense for pennies for a couple years and we get a third year at a discount, too...while reinvesting that cap space into extensions for guys that step up.

It's extremely doubtful this happens, but teams don't spend that much in scouting currency on a guy they aren't genuinely interested in.

They only have so many scouts and they sent guys to almost all of Lynches games.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12181190)
Yup.

Somebody is gonna move up for him.

Honestly, I'd love it if Dorsey moved up using a third or something from next year and took him before Denver can...but I understand either way.

KC spent a ****ton of resources to scout the kid. Scouts at almost every game.

I trust that they know his worth better than anyone.

If we draft him, I'll be ecstatic.

We would get 2 dirt cheap years of him starting...we could probably recoup a second or third for Alex Smith, if we wanted to move him at that point. Lots of teams will be losing their veteran QBs to age in that time span and would love to have another vet step in. Getting a pick for Alex and clearing up that much cap space would be a huge difference maker.

Then Lynch runs the offense for pennies for a couple years and we get a third year at a discount, too...while reinvesting that cap space into extensions for guys that step up.

It's extremely doubtful this happens, but teams don't spend that much in scouting currency on a guy they aren't genuinely interested in.

They only have so many scouts and they sent guys to almost all of Lynches games.

You want to trade away Smith and move up for an unproven QB straight out of college? A QB who doesn't understand Reid's offense with zero experience in the pistol, and has zero chemistry with any of the players?

You're drunk. Turn off your computer.

O.city 04-16-2016 10:58 AM

They run the pistol at Memphis

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181604)
They run the pistol at Memphis

A true pistol offense needs to have a QB that has running abilities. Lynch cannot run worth ****. Fact.

O.city 04-16-2016 11:12 AM

Pistol offense isn't an option or veer offense.

You're unclear on what a fact is

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181613)
Pistol offense isn't an option or veer offense.

You're unclear on what a fact is

I can tell you for a fact that Memphis did NOT run a pistol and Lynch played mostly in a spread offense. There is a clear difference in the two.

Implying you can insert Lynch into this offense is essentially wiping out a significant % of the playbook that took years for Smith and Reid to fine tune.

O.city 04-16-2016 11:24 AM

The pistol is a formation, not an offense

O.city 04-16-2016 11:29 AM

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...yDkNMSxvQZLbtQhttps://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...yDkNMSxvQZLbtQ

Discuss Thrower 04-16-2016 11:32 AM

The veer!






What a ****ing dumbass.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181625)
The pistol is a formation,

The pistol is a VERSION of the spread. And it's effective with a QB who understands how to use fakes and the read/option. Lynch would not flourish in this type of offense and his long release time screams disaster.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 11:41 AM

Fuente ran MULTIPLE designs that were based on the spread. Again, Lynch did not play in the pistol offense as his base scheme, he was in the spread. Your post clearly states that he played Pistol in his college career.

One play of a handoff doesn't prove to us anything. If you are trying to squash the fact that Lynch canNOT run the ball, you are going to fail miserably. In fact, you should look up his stats as a runner, you will be severely disappointed.

Your argument is the equivalent of saying when Smith lines up in the goal formation to hand off to the fullback that our offensive scheme cannot be a spread/pistol offense despite being the predominant design

You are the epitome of stupid. Just like your love for Lynch.

O.city 04-16-2016 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181645)
Fuente ran MULTIPLE designs that were based on the spread. Again, Lynch did not play in the pistol offense as his base scheme. One play of a handoff doesn't prove to us anything. If you are trying to squash the fact that Lynch canNOT run the ball, you are going to fail miserably. In fact, you should look up his stats as a runner, you will be severely disappointed.

Your argument is the equivalent of saying when Smith lines up in the goal formation to hand off to the fullback that our offense isn't a pistol offense in the predominant scheme.

You are the epitome of stupid. Just like your love for Lynch.

The pistol is a formatiin. It's not an offense. There's no base scheme, there's none of what you're spouting off here.

You simply don't understand what you're talking about. You have heard some words and you're putting them together. So, good job with that I guess.

You guaranteed for a fact they didn't run a set out of the pistol formatiin, they did, you're aND idiot.

Who gives a shit if the guy can run the ball? He's a qb. He needs to play from the pocket. I could give a shit about paxton lycnh, as you can see, I made this thread a long ass time ago. He's not coming to kc, so it doesn't matter.

But you constantly talking out your ass pretty interesting so I'll keep posting.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181649)
The pistol is a formatiin. It's not an offense. There's no base scheme, there's none of what you're spouting off here.

You simply don't understand what you're talking about. You have heard some words and you're putting them together. So, good job with that I guess.

You guaranteed for a fact they didn't run a set out of the pistol formatiin, they did, you're aND idiot.

Who gives a shit if the guy can run the ball? He's a qb. He needs to play from the pocket. I could give a shit about paxton lycnh, as you can see, I made this thread a long ass time ago. He's not coming to kc, so it doesn't matter.

But you constantly talking out your ass pretty interesting so I'll keep posting.

Your original post clearly stated that Memphis ran the pistol offense, implying he was a Kaepernick type like Ault's system in Nevada. You are the dumbass who came on here without fact checking.

Also, If you're so big on Lynch, tell me what exactly on paper tell us that he can even run the pistol effectively now that I've educated you on the fact that he canNOT run the ball. Better yet, tell me how his skill set would even be compatible with Reid's complicated west coast offense?

I think you can get Lynch's nuts out of your mouth now.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181649)

Who gives a shit if the guy can run the ball? He's a qb. He needs to play from the pocket. I could give a shit about paxton lycnh, as you can see, I made this thread a long ass time ago. He's not coming to kc, so it doesn't matter.

But you constantly talking out your ass pretty interesting so I'll keep posting.

And just so you're aware, a dual threat QB has made it to the Superbowl for the last 4 years. As amazing as Rodgers is and arguably the greatest pure passer in history, he does not have as high of a ceiling that Russell Wilson does.

SAUTO 04-16-2016 12:05 PM

Aaron Rodgers doesn't have the ceiling that Wilson has?

ROFL

threebag 04-16-2016 12:06 PM

I am thinking if Denver wants him we move up and steal him. Even if he sits and we trade him away later. I just really hate Denver and would like to see them get ****ed every chance they can.

milkman 04-16-2016 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181666)
And just so you're aware, a dual threat QB has made it to the Superbowl for the last 4 years. As amazing as Rodgers is and arguably the greatest pure passer in history, he does not have as high of a ceiling that Russell Wilson does.

What?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12181668)
Aaron Rodgers doesn't have the ceiling that Wilson has?

ROFL

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/...russell-wilson

27 years old and only 4 years in the NFL and he's now able to throw 68% completion percentage with a group of mediocre receivers that he had to develop himself. Not to mention despite a difficult schedule he put up 4500 all-purpose yards

Wilson: 1 SB ; Rodgers: 1 SB
Who has more years remaining?

Consider yourself a ****ing moron.

In a strict passing contest, I'll take Rodgers over Wilson. If I want someone running my offense with the same level of talent at receiver, I'm taking Russell Wilson. No question about it.

O.city 04-16-2016 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181659)
Your original post clearly stated that Memphis ran the pistol offense, implying he was a Kaepernick type like Ault's system in Nevada. You are the dumbass who came on here without fact checking.

Also, If you're so big on Lynch, tell me what exactly on paper tell us that he can even run the pistol effectively now that I've educated you on the fact that he canNOT run the ball. Better yet, tell me how his skill set would even be compatible with Reid's complicated west coast offense?

I think you can get Lynch's nuts out of your mouth now.

The pistol isn't an offense. It's a formation

O.city 04-16-2016 12:21 PM

Blackbob is allowed to run around like this yet clay isn't here?

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181684)
The pistol isn't an offense. It's a formation

Whether or not you want to admit its a style or formation, the fact is lynch is not suited for it with his inability to run the ball. I'm going to continue to tie this back to your post that you claimed he ran the pistol offense cause clearly, this was not his primary scheme.

O.city 04-16-2016 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181688)
Whether or not you want to admit its a style or formation, the fact is lynch is not suited for it with his inability to run the ball. I'm going to continue to tie this back to your post that you claimed he ran the pistol offense cause clearly, this was not his primary scheme.

Oh so now it isn't his primary scheme, I thought it was a fact he didnt do it?

You're clueless at this. Good job.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 04-16-2016 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181604)
They run the pistol at Memphis

This post sums up your stupidity. Thanks for the laugh. I'll consider this as the end of your man crush of Paxton

O.city 04-16-2016 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181696)
This post sums up your stupidity. Thanks for the laugh.

So they don't run the pistol at Memphis?

O.city 04-16-2016 12:35 PM

You guaranteed me that they didnt, yet unless my eyes are deceiving me, there's a still of them in yhe pistol set.

So?

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-16-2016 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181599)
You want to trade away Smith and move up for an unproven QB straight out of college? A QB who doesn't understand Reid's offense with zero experience in the pistol, and has zero chemistry with any of the players?

You're drunk. Turn off your computer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181611)
A true pistol offense needs to have a QB that has running abilities. Lynch cannot run worth ****. Fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12181666)
And just so you're aware, a dual threat QB has made it to the Superbowl for the last 4 years. As amazing as Rodgers is and arguably the greatest pure passer in history, he does not have as high of a ceiling that Russell Wilson does.

You really are a special breed of Quartertard.

The Franchise 04-16-2016 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181686)
Blackbob is allowed to run around like this yet clay isn't here?

I keep asking this and I get no answers.

milkman 04-16-2016 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12181711)
I keep asking this and I get no answers.

I can't speak for the mods, but stupidity isn't a bannable offense, IMO.

saphojunkie 04-16-2016 01:14 PM

I do find it interesting that the Chiefs currently have TWO home grown QBs on their roster. One is an UDFA and the other an actual Chiefs draft pick. If either Bray or Murray work out, don't we actually get what we've been wanting for a long time, without needing a single more resource thrown at the QB position.

Or is it simply that no one here thinks that either of those two guys have what it takes?

RunKC 04-16-2016 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181686)
Blackbob is allowed to run around like this yet clay isn't here?

The guy is dumb but he's actually talking about the thread topic. Clay ruined nearly every thread and diverted it to one tiresome topic, and he did it for years.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-16-2016 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 12181741)
I do find it interesting that the Chiefs currently have TWO home grown QBs on their roster. One is an UDFA and the other an actual Chiefs draft pick. If either Bray or Murray work out, don't we actually get what we've been wanting for a long time, without needing a single more resource thrown at the QB position.

Or is it simply that no one here thinks that either of those two guys have what it takes?

I believe those two are highly capable of performing at a level of excellence that is deemed acceptable by the Chiefs.

Discuss Thrower 04-16-2016 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 12181741)
I do find it interesting that the Chiefs currently have TWO home grown QBs on their roster. One is an UDFA and the other an actual Chiefs draft pick. If either Bray or Murray work out, don't we actually get what we've been wanting for a long time, without needing a single more resource thrown at the QB position.

Or is it simply that no one here thinks that either of those two guys have what it takes?

Those with access to practices in season said that it was very clear that the depth chart accurately reflected the QB situation in KC as it pertained to ability to play the position.

Smith had no real challenge from being unseated as the starter by Daniel, and Murray showed nothing that hinted at being a more capable backup than Daniel.

Bray is vaporware at this point.

Ergo, the Chiefs need to move on from both Murray and Bray sooner than later.

threebag 04-16-2016 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12181686)
Blackbob is allowed to run around like this yet clay isn't here?

Thank you mods.

milkman 04-16-2016 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12181829)
Those with access to practices in season said that it was very clear that the depth chart accurately reflected the QB situation in KC as it pertained to ability to play the position.

Smith had no real challenge from being unseated as the starter by Daniel, and Murray showed nothing that hinted at being a more capable backup than Daniel.

Bray is vaporware at this point.

Ergo, the Chiefs need to move on from both Murray and Bray sooner than later.

The guys who had access to in season practices could draw this conclusion while watching practices that generally see the starter get 90% or more of the snaps with the starting unit, the backup getting the rest, while 3rd string maybe runs the scout team.

Yep, real inside scoop stuff there.

Sorter 04-16-2016 02:19 PM

Y'all posting in a blackbob thread.

Mr_Tomahawk 04-28-2016 08:39 PM

Who said he wouldn't make it past the 9ers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Garcia Bronco 04-28-2016 08:45 PM

Rumor: Broncos trying to trade in front of you...most likely for Lynch


Minny backed out

Mr_Tomahawk 04-28-2016 08:51 PM

Who's your source? A Cracker Jack box?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TEX 04-28-2016 08:58 PM

Denver...

Garcia Bronco 04-28-2016 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 12201413)
Who's your source? A Cracker Jack box?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I got people.

Jerok 04-28-2016 09:00 PM

No, don't let him go to Denver, no.... hope they had to trade the farm and the farmer's daughter.

Chief_For_Life58 04-28-2016 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 12201568)
I got people.

Looks like those people be right


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.