ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Jordan Love holding out (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=354200)

Red Dawg 07-22-2024 01:33 PM

They should pay him. He is one of the few QB's that look dangerous.

Bump 07-22-2024 01:40 PM

one good season, I wouldn't break the bank if I were the packers. Maybe something along the lines of a 3 year $100 mill deal

Sassy Squatch 07-22-2024 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17596051)
one good season, I wouldn't break the bank if I were the packers. Maybe something along the lines of a 3 year $100 mill deal

LMAO That's not happening.

T-post Tom 07-22-2024 01:45 PM

Revenge for keeping him on the bench behind the old man.

Bump 07-22-2024 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17596057)
LMAO That's not happening.

Probably not, he probably thinks he deserves north of Pat Mahomes money which is ludicrous IMO. But that's where the NFL is at with QBs

RINGLEADER 07-22-2024 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17596051)
one good season, I wouldn't break the bank if I were the packers. Maybe something along the lines of a 3 year $100 mill deal

More like 3 years/$150 million.

Honestly, I don’t think he’d take that (wanting a longer deal with more money locked in).

Gary Cooper 07-22-2024 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17596051)
one good season, I wouldn't break the bank if I were the packers. Maybe something along the lines of a 3 year $100 mill deal

That would be an insulting deal considering what other QBs with less upside and talent are making.

PatMahomesIsGod 07-22-2024 02:10 PM

Probs a close to top of market deal with less guaranteed money due to small performance sample size.

staylor26 07-22-2024 02:16 PM

I'd rather be paying Love than a lot of these other QBs.

Sure, there's more risk, but more upside as well.

Valiant 07-22-2024 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedinTexas (Post 17595451)
I hate it when players hold out. They sign their contracts then refuse to honor them. Teams can't refuse to honor their contracts with players, but players can refuse to honor their contracts with the teams.

I mean. If there is no guaranteed money teams can cut them and not honor it?

DRM08 07-22-2024 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17596070)
Probably not, he probably thinks he deserves north of Pat Mahomes money which is ludicrous IMO. But that's where the NFL is at with QBs

Trevor Lawrence just got $55M per year including $200M guaranteed. So yeah, the market is crazy. Teams either pay the market rate or start over with a different guy.

Megatron96 07-22-2024 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Cooper (Post 17596098)
That would be an insulting deal considering what other QBs with less upside and talent are making.



Insulting? Think that's an overstatement.


Love lost 6 of his first 9 games last season. His overall regular season record since joining the NFL is an Eli Manning-esque 9-9-0. And some of those losses in 2023 were against the likes of an ATL team led by the hapless Desmond Ridder, LVR sporting one of the worst secondaries of this century, DEN:rolleyes:, and a QB-less PIT.


I wouldn't pay Love more than 3 years/$100 million for 8 good games out of 27, especially when considering his complete lack of production in his first 10 games prior to last season. Basically, if you pay him top-10 $$$ you're doing it solely because his TD/INT ratio is great, and his Passer Rating last season was 96.1.


The problem for GB is that they really should be trying to avoid shitting their pants the way DAL and WAS did with Dak and Cousins. Mostly they need to avoid the Dak scenario of way overpaying a QB for a partial good season and screwing their cap for the next 5 years.

wazu 07-22-2024 02:44 PM

I'm gonna guess $200M for 5 years, with $100M guaranteed at signing.

Sassy Squatch 07-22-2024 02:46 PM

Tack on a 50 to each of those numbers. At least.

wazu 07-22-2024 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17596196)
Tack on a 50 to each of those numbers. At least.

Probably right.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.