![]() |
Quote:
|
The problem with trading up far enough to get Darrisaw is you'd probably have to get to 12 or so. Going from 31 to 12 is gonna be....pricey.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you trade away the top of next year's draft for a LT, he better be a 16-game starter right away and he better be at least good. It's a huge risk. |
Quote:
LT is so important I'd understand the swing for it. In the grand scheme of things, giving up pick 31 this year and say our first next year and third this year isn't THAT crazy. |
If they were giving up a first that was gonna be in the teens or something, I'd be alot more hesitant. But they're gonna be in the AFC champ game again, atleast barring injuries.
Those players you're picking at the end of the first are usually 2nd round type prospects anyway, similar to what we're looking at this year. So if that pick can get you a franchise LT, do it. Whether the guy they trade up for is that or not, who knows. |
Quote:
|
I think Sewell and Slater are both gone by the Chargers pick. Darrisaw might be there in the late teens and that’s when we should strike bc he isn’t going to be there after Miami at 18.
Miami sure does love stockpiling picks, plus they have a top 10 pick already, so if we want to trade for Darrisaw that’s probably the sweet spot. Probably cost this years first, next years first, a 3rd and we can probably toss in our extra 4th this year |
Quote:
|
Rondale Moore WR Purdue.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Those 2 would be reliable LT’s IMO |
And for all the talk about Darrisaw....you’re banking on him going from a run first team to a team like the Chiefs and succeeding.
|
We're in a bad spot in that the positions we need to fill are pretty tough to fill at the spots we're picking.
LT, DE and QB are high round positions normally. So you're gonna have to wheel and deal or develop someone not as highly rated. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.