ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs SCHEFTER- Crennel to Chiefs Imminent (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221244)

Saccopoo 01-06-2010 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6416657)
I'm not saying I agree with it, I'm just saying its they way things go in the NFL. "Anything you can do, I can do better!"

I'd LOVE for the Chiefs to hire some progressive up and coming guys from college. Its just not gonna happen. Unfortunately, we're stuck with this. Wash, rinse, repeat...

Who would those up and coming guys from college be?

And do you want a complete NFL rebuild job (which the Chiefs are at this point) to be handled by some unproven kid that's no older than the players?

Besides the fact that the transition from the college ranks to the pro ranks is usually a hard road. It always seems to work out better to get a guy that has been associated with the pro game versus some college coordinator somewhere.

No, I think for this situation, I'd like to have the young and up and coming coach, which we now have, surrounded by experienced coordinators that the players can trust and look to in terms of understanding and experience in what it takes to get to the top in this league.

The Bunk 01-06-2010 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 6416702)
Meh...I'll take the guy with 5 championship rings....

I'll side with the Internet guy living in his mom's basement.

soundmind 01-06-2010 07:52 PM

If your balls are in a vice over this, what exactly would you suggest?

Should we just toss Haley and Pioli since they've known eachother a while now too? I'm sure we could get Matt Millen and Jim Zorn in here, I don't think they've worked together. Then we should hire the OC of Boise State (to design Zorn's trick plays), and then get our DC from a Korean soccer outfit (we'll play zero down lineman, its a new 7-4 look). Also, no one has neon blue uni's....we should look into those too.

I guarantee no one in the NFL has tried this combination and it's sure to be better than this experienced, accredited "good ol boys" crap.

We'll take the league by storm!

Just Passin' By 01-06-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416700)
Save for the part that they didn't actually win, and that Parcells has never won a playoff game w/o Belichick holding his hand on defense...

Right, so ignoring the fact that you're being asshole enough to demand a Super Bowl victory as proof of success, and ignoring that Parcells record on his own is irrelevant to your question, and ignoring that the Parcells/Belichick example undercuts your idiotic complaint....


Ignoring all that, you still have no real point at all.

EyePod 01-06-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416698)
Well, I never would have switched to the 3-4, because Glenn Dorsey is a much better player than Tyson Jackson will ever be.

But, if he abso-****ing-lutely had to stay with the 3-4, I'd want us to move away from this two-gap bend-but-don't-break bullshit, and get a guy that runs an attacking scheme, so that we can at least force mistakes and turnovers to mask the lack of talent.

I'd like to see us take a look at Reggie Herring. He has experience in a 3-4 and 4-3 defense. Also Mike Pettine of the Jets or our own Greg Manusky.

The worst part is that Pendergast is pretty good at setting up blitzes. The problem is he's bad with timing them. I mean, Arizona is one of the hardest teams to read now blitz-wise, and Pendergast was a huge part of putting that defense together. And teams that blitz well screw up an offense so much. Just look what Dallas did to Philly last week.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-06-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bunk (Post 6416707)
I'll side with the Internet guy living in his mom's basement.

:spock:

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 6416702)
Meh...I'll take the guy with 5 championship rings....

Yeah, like when Vermeil told the fans to STFU about Greg Robinson b/c he knew more than anyone else b/c he had two SB rings.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6416709)
Right, so ignoring the fact that you're being asshole enough to demand a Super Bowl victory as proof of success, and ignoring that Parcells record on his own is irrelevant to your question, and ignoring that the Parcells/Belichick example undercuts your idiotic complaint....


Ignoring all that, you still have no real point at all.

So the point of playing in the NFL is to lose the Super Bowl.

Got it.

Must be why so many Chiefs fans talk about 1966 instead of 1969.

TheGuardian 01-06-2010 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416698)
Well, I never would have switched to the 3-4, because Glenn Dorsey is a much better player than Tyson Jackson will ever be.

But, if he abso-****ing-lutely had to stay with the 3-4, I'd want us to move away from this two-gap bend-but-don't-break bullshit, and get a guy that runs an attacking scheme, so that we can at least force mistakes and turnovers to mask the lack of talent.

I'd like to see us take a look at Reggie Herring. He has experience in a 3-4 and 4-3 defense. Also Mike Pettine of the Jets or our own Greg Manusky.

Glen Dorsey is not a 3-technique Warren Sapp type player. Just because they are built the same doesn't mean anything. you keep saying this. I watched every game he played at when he was at LSU and I never understood the Sapp comparisons. He's not as explosive and never has been. He is not a 4-3 under-tackle guy. There is a reason he had a really solid season this year.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bunk (Post 6416707)
I'll side with the Internet guy living in his mom's basement.

Own my own house, there, champ.

MTG#10 01-06-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416700)
Save for the part that they didn't actually win, and that Parcells has never won a playoff game w/o Belichick holding his hand on defense...

Dude Im trying to have some optimism for my team thats been breaking my heart for years and you're really bringing me down

Mr_Tomahawk 01-06-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416714)
Yeah, like when Vermeil told the fans to STFU about Greg Robinson b/c he knew more than anyone else b/c he had two SB rings.

Passing judgement on coaches with superbowl experience because of a sour experience with your own team...?

Mr_Tomahawk 01-06-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6416721)
Own my own house, there, champ.

I didn't get that either...

wild1 01-06-2010 07:56 PM

The spastic bitching starts immediately... jeez. Why would you want to live your life that way?

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-06-2010 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6416720)
Glen Dorsey is not a 3-technique Warren Sapp type player. Just because they are built the same doesn't mean anything. you keep saying this. I watched every game he played at when he was at LSU and I never understood the Sapp comparisons. He's not as explosive and never has been. He is not a 4-3 under-tackle guy. There is a reason he had a really solid season this year.

I know that you keep saying that, and I disagree because I watched him play in college, I read the scouting reports, and I know what he's capable of.

The reason why he played well this year is because he's a phenomenally talented football player, and like Derrick Thomas, can be put in a scheme that minimizes his talents (a la, the Falcon) and still get results.


(I fully expect the reeruns on this board to now claim that I've said that Thomas=Dorsey)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.