ChiefsPlanet
Page 48 of 138 « First 3844454647 48 495051525898 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

Rams Fan 10-06-2011 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7972737)
well ... since all the MU fans keep saying that the only thing that matters is t.v. market, he might be right.
Maybe. But I don't know how many people watch BYU's network.

kstater 10-06-2011 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972734)
I think it's on PPV, IIRC.

And it's against Iowa ****ing St.
No, Mizzou declined both FCS and PPV.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-06-2011 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972742)
Maybe. But I don't know how many people watch BYU's network.
BYU is looking to be a no-go.

Mr_Tomahawk 10-06-2011 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 7972744)
BYU is looking to be a no-go.
Source?

Mr. Laz 10-06-2011 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972742)
Maybe. But I don't know how many people watch BYU's network.
true, the number of t.v. isn't as great as the geographical area but if you add a quality conference schedule then the number of t.v. could grow exponentially.

Same goes for Notre Dame, the golden domers don't think they need anyone and maybe they don't. But you add a quality conference identity to their brand name and it could explode.

Pants 10-06-2011 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972707)
No. I don't feel like getting into an argument.

However, there are some major douches in this thread.
You couldn't argue your way out of a soggy paper bag. And I agree, a lot of douches in here. Of course you're one of them with your super hilarious and clever sarcasm sprinkled all over the thread. Keep on keeping on, brother.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-06-2011 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7972755)
true, the number of t.v. isn't as great as the geographical area but if you add a quality conference schedule then the number of t.v. could grow exponentially.

Same goes for Notre Dame, the golden domers don't think they need anyone and maybe they don't. But you add a quality conference identity to their brand name and it could explode.
Why would you saddle yourself with a conference when you have a national TV contract on a major network that allows you prime scheduling every week?

KChiefs1 10-06-2011 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972705)
TCU, BYU, Louisville, and WVU are all upgrades over Nebraska, Missouri, aTm and Colorado.
ROFLROFL

DJ's left nut 10-06-2011 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 7972729)
wait a minute, am I to understand that MU's 100th homecoming, a historic game, a marquee television matchup....hasn't even sold out?
There's mostly just single-seat tickets available at this point, and those are always a bitch to sell (though they'll almost always go in walkup sales to folks that show up to tailgate, buy their single-seat then the just squeeze in with their friends on the bench).

There are probably 8-10 sections where you can still get 4-6 seats in a block, but those will be gone shortly as well. Besides, once again, our stadium at about 2/3 full is right at the capacity of good ol' Snyder Stadium.

Don't you worry your pretty little head about our attendance, m'kay? Mizzou does just fine.

Saulbadguy 10-06-2011 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7972717)
Fitz, she's only 15.

Tim Fitzgerald, "I don't care"
FYP

DJ's left nut 10-06-2011 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7972759)
Why would you saddle yourself with a conference when you have a national TV contract on a major network that allows you prime scheduling every week?
If it goes 'superconference', for scheduling.

It will be tough for ND to keep getting games scheduled when suddenly everyone is down to 3 Non-Con games.

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7972692)
They give out trophies for losing the Border War game?
Remember.... football isn't even a real sport.

kchero 10-06-2011 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7972783)
FYP
LMAO

DJ's left nut 10-06-2011 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7972734)
I think it's on PPV, IIRC.

And it's against Iowa ****ing St.
Pants is right - you're not very good at this.

kstater 10-06-2011 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7972759)
Why would you saddle yourself with a conference when you have a national TV contract on a major network that allows you prime scheduling every week?

I think they only get 15M and they have to use a chunk of that to pay other teams.

Bambi 10-06-2011 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 7972739)
Gettin' trolled
no-troll here.

Just lookin at trophy cases.

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7972634)
"If anyone's causing instability, it's them (Missouri)" -Jason King
He is a KU guy, regardless of where he graduated from. I simply laughed at that comment.

Frazod 10-06-2011 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7972680)
The only positive thing out of MU staying at this point is use of the Sprint Center.

It's a wonderful feeling to cruise across into MO and leave with a trophy.

From that angle yes, I want Missouri to stay.
Sort of like the feeling anybody from Kansas gets any time they want to watch a professional sporting event? Well, other than *snicker* soccer.

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7972801)
Sort of like the feeling anybody from Kansas gets any time they want to watch a professional sporting event? Well, other than *snicker* soccer.
Soccer and Golf.... professional sports played in Kansas.

Rams Fan 10-06-2011 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7972787)
Pants is right - you're not very good at this.
I never said I was getting into an argument, was I?

I just said Iowa ****ing State.

Frazod 10-06-2011 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 7972802)
Soccer and Golf.... professional sports played in Kansas.
I guess we shouldn't forget Nascar. YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWW

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7972807)
I guess we shouldn't forget Nascar. YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWW
Hey I wanted Nascar on the Missouri side.

Rams Fan 10-06-2011 03:37 PM
I shall bow out of this thread now.

Y'all have fun.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-06-2011 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7972784)
If it goes 'superconference', for scheduling.

It will be tough for ND to keep getting games scheduled when suddenly everyone is down to 3 Non-Con games.
If they were BYU, I'd agree, but I don't see it being a problem for them. What they lack in recruiting prowess, they still bring in an ability to draw and name recognition.

USC, Michigan, MSU, Purdue and the service academies give them 6-7 games a year.

That means you need another five. Pull three from outside of the super conferences and another two. I don't think it's incredibly difficult

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7972307)
I like this.

Winning the Orange Bowl was in my top 5 sports moments of all time. With this setup I can see KU getting back sooner than I thought.
They aren't ever getting back there.....

Bambi 10-06-2011 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7972801)
Sort of like the feeling anybody from Kansas gets any time they want to watch a professional sporting event? Well, other than *snicker* soccer.
Yea, and all Giants fans come from New Jersey.

Sometimes people build their homes in the nice place, and dump their traffic-filled sports complexes in the other place.

LMAO

Al Bundy 10-06-2011 03:42 PM
Isn't New Jersey New York's trash dump?

Pants 10-06-2011 03:42 PM
This thread really is going to catch AIDS if we start talking about state superiority again.

Bambi 10-06-2011 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 7972816)
They aren't ever getting back there.....
Well good thing they didn't screw it up when they got there. :)

Frazod 10-06-2011 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7972820)
Yea, and all Giants fans come from New Jersey.

Sometimes people build their homes in the nice place, and dump their traffic-filled sports complexes in the other place.

LMAO
Yeah, another reminder of how the best part of your wasteland piece of shit state is suburb of one of our cities.

DJ's left nut 10-06-2011 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7972823)
This thread really is going to catch AIDS if we start talking about state superiority again.
Well fortunately there's really nothing to talk about... ;)

HemiEd 10-06-2011 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF Knight (Post 7972816)
They aren't ever getting back there.....
Careful........I have seen it twice in my lifetime. Don't recall Mizzou ever going though.

KCSupersized 10-06-2011 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 7972844)
Careful........I have seen it twice in my lifetime. Don't recall Mizzou ever going though.
I think they won it in 1961, and lost it in 1960.

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 04:43 PM
Starting to see some tweets that Mizzou will commit to a conference in the next 48 hours. Seems out that they would announce on a Saturday, so probably won't hear anything till Monday if the rumors are true.

chefsos 10-06-2011 05:10 PM
Hey you guys, shut up for a minute and lookit the way it used to be:

http://i954.photobucket.com/albums/a...84774988_o.jpghttp://i954.photobucket.com/albums/a...e3fffc97_o.jpghttp://i954.photobucket.com/albums/a...5e00240c_o.jpghttp://i954.photobucket.com/albums/a...2ca7454f_o.jpg

There's more...http://www.uni-watch.com/2011/01/22/...u/#wearefamily

I thought these were kind of funny.

Mizzou_8541 10-06-2011 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7972918)
Starting to see some tweets that Mizzou will commit to a conference in the next 48 hours. Seems out that they would announce on a Saturday, so probably won't hear anything till Monday if the rumors are true.
I think it took aTm 16 days from "exploring options" to being officially a member of the SEC.

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 7972993)
I think it took aTm 16 days from "exploring options" to being officially a member of the SEC.
Saw another tweet that says the 13 team schedule was not taken well at the AD meeting in the SEC, and that no one wants to play with 13 teams, so adding #14 may have moved up on their schedule as well.

Mizzou_8541 10-06-2011 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7973004)
Saw another tweet that says the 13 team schedule was not taken well at the AD meeting in the SEC, and that no one wants to play with 13 teams, so adding #14 may have moved up on their schedule as well.
IF this happens with Mizzou, I will be curious to see how the cross division rivals are handled, and where we end up.

Dr. Gigglepants 10-06-2011 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 7973031)
IF this happens with Mizzou, I will be curious to see how the cross division rivals are handled, and where we end up.
I think the easiest thing to do is to put us in the East, A&M in the West, and make us the cross-division rivals. IMO, Auburn actually wants us in the West, so they can go East, and get out of LSU and Bama's division. This would mean that Bama, would either lose their yearly game with Tenn, or the Iron Bowl.

Neither of which Bama wants to give up. I'd say this is probably one of the issues they are working out to get the votes they need to allow MU into the conference.

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 7973057)
I think the easiest thing to do is to put us in the East, A&M in the West, and make us the cross-division rivals. IMO, Auburn actually wants us in the West, so they can go East, and get out of LSU and Bama's division. This would mean that Bama, would either lose their yearly game with Tenn, or the Iron Bowl.

Neither of which Bama wants to give up. I'd say this is probably one of the issues they are working out to get the votes they need to allow MU into the conference.
This makes sense. If the Tigers land in the West, football is tougher with both Alabama and LSU in their division. But basketball would be much more competitve. Alabama won the SEC West in bball last year but still did not make the tourney. If Mizzou lands in the East, I think they will competitive much faster, as Florida is only real powerhouse over there. (TN is done, and I put Georgia and SC on a similar level with Mizzou). Bball would be much tougher though with both Kentucky and Florida in the East.

DaKCMan AP 10-06-2011 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7973071)
This makes sense. If the Tigers land in the West, football is tougher with both Alabama and LSU in their division. But basketball would be much more competitve. Alabama won the SEC West in bball last year but still did not make the tourney. If Mizzou lands in the East, I think they will competitive much faster, as Florida is only real powerhouse over there. (TN is done, and I put Georgia and SC on a similar level with Mizzou). Bball would be much tougher though with both Kentucky and Florida in the East.
Because of the Alabama situation in basketball last year the SEC voted to get rid of divisions in basketball. If you think Tennessee is done and Georgia/USC are cake-walks then you're nuts.

Saul Good 10-06-2011 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 7973113)
Because of the Alabama situation in basketball last year the SEC voted to get rid of divisions in basketball. If you think Tennessee is done and Georgia/USC are cake-walks then you're nuts.
How did you get Georgia/USC are cake-walks out of him saying that they are on the same level as Mizzou?

DaKCMan AP 10-06-2011 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7973123)
How did you get Georgia/USC are cake-walks out of him saying that they are on the same level as Mizzou?
Because Mizzou is a cake-walk.







:D

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 7973113)
Because of the Alabama situation in basketball last year the SEC voted to get rid of divisions in basketball. If you think Tennessee is done and Georgia/USC are cake-walks then you're nuts.
Wasn't implying that they are cake walks at all. Merely that if Mizzou was to play them, Mizzou would have a realistic shot at winning the game. Mizzou is not on the level of LSU, Bama, or Florida. If Mizzou was to beat one of them, it would be consider a big upset. If Mizzou was to beat Georgia on a Saturday afternoon, it might be an upset...but not a Sportcenter breaking news one.

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 7973113)
Because of the Alabama situation in basketball last year the SEC voted to get rid of divisions in basketball. If you think Tennessee is done and Georgia/USC are cake-walks then you're nuts.
So how is bball going to work then with 14 teams and no divisions? Will everyone play each other at least once? How will it be determined which opponents you play twice?

Crush 10-06-2011 08:47 PM
I am becoming more and more excited about the possibility of Mizzou playing in the SEC. Hopefully, it works out for Mizzou and the university can finally rid itself of Texas.

Saulbadguy 10-06-2011 08:47 PM
too lazy to look it up, what is Mizzou's record vs Texas in the Big XII?

eazyb81 10-06-2011 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7973327)
too lazy to look it up, what is Mizzou's record vs Texas in the Big XII?
Pretty sure Mizzou has won 9 of 12.

Crush 10-06-2011 08:58 PM
Mizzou is 5-17 all-time against Texas and 1-7 in the Big XII. I am just tired off Texas's off the field bullshit.

Crush 10-06-2011 08:59 PM
**** Texas and double **** Baylor.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-06-2011 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7973342)
Pretty sure Mizzou has won 9 of 12.
LOL...close!!

Bambi 10-06-2011 10:01 PM
Still trying to figure out what Texas has ever done to Missouri.

Maybe someone will give us a reason here one day.

doomy3 10-06-2011 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7973342)
Pretty sure Mizzou has won 9 of 12.
:spock:

Crush 10-06-2011 10:34 PM
It looks like Rutgers has also decided to put itself on the market.

mnchiefsguy 10-06-2011 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7973492)
Still trying to figure out what Texas has ever done to Missouri.

Maybe someone will give us a reason here one day.
Every time I think you have reached the threshold of your ignorance, you say something to push the threshold.

Sometimes I think you love Texas more than Texas fans, you go down on them enough.

alnorth 10-06-2011 11:10 PM
Among the TCU and high school restrictions, I missed this rather important LHN concession:

Quote:
And there are new provisions for a school carrying more than one of its own football games on its network; it must obtain league permission, and the participating schools would give up their shares of league-wide network proceeds from the game.
That pretty well wraps up the concerns about ESPN perhaps having a conflict of interest and causing a UT game to fall to tier 3. They have to get permission from the conference to show more than 1 conference game, and even if they do get permission, both schools forfeit any claim to proceeds from that game. So basically "UT wants to show a 2nd conference game on LHN and the school they are playing is fine with it? OK fine, but we're taking the money and neither school gets a cut of that game"

That pretty well solves just about every major concern about school networks.

DaKCMan AP 10-07-2011 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7973198)
So how is bball going to work then with 14 teams and no divisions? Will everyone play each other at least once? How will it be determined which opponents you play twice?
They have to figure that out, even with 13 teams. They made the move before Texas A&M joined the league. With 12 teams the way it was going to work for next season was 16 conference games.

2 games each against your original division foes = 10 games
1 game each against the other division = 6 games

They were then going to either keep a 16 conference game schedule switching up the games, move to an 18 game conference schedule, or a 22 game round-robin conference schedule (least likely).

Now with 13 and possibly 14 teams they'll have to re-evaluate.

Saul Good 10-07-2011 06:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7973562)
Among the TCU and high school restrictions, I missed this rather important LHN concession:



That pretty well wraps up the concerns about ESPN perhaps having a conflict of interest and causing a UT game to fall to tier 3. They have to get permission from the conference to show more than 1 conference game, and even if they do get permission, both schools forfeit any claim to proceeds from that game. So basically "UT wants to show a 2nd conference game on LHN and the school they are playing is fine with it? OK fine, but we're taking the money and neither school gets a cut of that game"

That pretty well solves just about every major concern about school networks.
That solves all of the except the biggest one. If Texas has its own network, there can be no viable conference network (like the B1G Network).

Saulbadguy 10-07-2011 06:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7973710)
That solves all of the except the biggest one. If Texas has its own network, there can be no viable conference network (like the B1G Network).
Schools are free to start their own network though, correct?

Infidel Goat 10-07-2011 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crush (Post 7973535)
It looks like Rutgers has also decided to put itself on the market.
Rutgers is praying that they will eventually be team #16 in the ACC.

I can't see the Big 10 taking them.

alnorth 10-07-2011 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7973710)
That solves all of the except the biggest one. If Texas has its own network, there can be no viable conference network (like the B1G Network).
The conference doesn't want a conference network. And by conference, I mean more than just Texas and OU, it has always been overwhelmingly voted down by the north schools as well. The Big 12 wants the SEC sharing model.

So given that, LHN really isn't a problem anymore.

alnorth 10-07-2011 07:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infidel Goat (Post 7973788)
Rutgers is praying that they will eventually be team #16 in the ACC.

I can't see the Big 10 taking them.
I could see the B1G taking them If they chose to expand, but that is a big if.

Rutgers sounds like a funny name, which might make some people think they are a weird private school that noone cares about, but they aren't. Rutgers is the flagship public school of New Jersey, without any significant collegiate competition in that market. If Rutgers is not an attractive school, then the STL and KC markets are irrelevant to MU's case as well.

patteeu 10-07-2011 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7973828)
The conference doesn't want a conference network. And by conference, I mean more than just Texas and OU, it has always been overwhelmingly voted down by the north schools as well. The Big 12 wants the SEC sharing model.

So given that, LHN really isn't a problem anymore.
I don't know what "the conference" wants, but Missouri might want a conference network and that's all that matters at the moment.

eazyb81 10-07-2011 07:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7973828)
The conference doesn't want a conference network. And by conference, I mean more than just Texas and OU, it has always been overwhelmingly voted down by the north schools as well. The Big 12 wants the SEC sharing model.

So given that, LHN really isn't a problem anymore.
The other Big 12 schools don't like money now?

BTN has proven that it is much more lucrative overall to pool tier 2 or 3 rights together and market them as a package to broadcasters, rather than having each school try to market their own tier 3 rights.

This is why the PAC and SEC are following in their footsteps, and it is why the Big 12 will continue to fall behind the pack in terms of overall conference TV revenue.

Saul Good 10-07-2011 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7973828)
The conference doesn't want a conference network. And by conference, I mean more than just Texas and OU, it has always been overwhelmingly voted down by the north schools as well. The Big 12 wants the SEC sharing model.

So given that, LHN really isn't a problem anymore.
The SEC is going to a B1G-style network. It's a license to print money.

Bambi 10-07-2011 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7973851)
The other Big 12 schools don't like money now?

BTN has proven that it is much more lucrative overall to pool tier 2 or 3 rights together and market them as a package to broadcasters, rather than having each school try to market their own tier 3 rights.

This is why the PAC and SEC are following in their footsteps, and it is why the Big 12 will continue to fall behind the pack in terms of overall conference TV revenue.
The Big 12 has like half of the alumni base around the country as the Big10 does.

Demand for a Big 12 network just isn't there.

Big money comes from individual schools...Texas, Kansas Basketball etc.

Everyone is free to start their own and make what they want with 3rd tier money.

Obviously the content is what is to be monitored, most notably high school sports highlights.

Frazod 10-07-2011 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7973552)
Every time I think you have reached the threshold of your ignorance, you say something to push the threshold.

Sometimes I think you love Texas more than Texas fans, you go down on them enough.
Well, since the Yankmees got greased last night, fanboy's obviously looking for a new super team bandwagon to hop on.

KChiefs1 10-07-2011 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7973859)
The SEC is going to a B1G-style network. It's a license to print money.
This would double what the B1G makes!

vailpass 10-07-2011 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 7973999)
This would double what the B1G makes!
Easy there. While it is true that many SEC households have more than 1 television it must also be taken into account that in 96% of those households one of those televisions does not work and is sitting in the front yard supporting the television that does work ifn you hold the beer can rabbit ears just right.

Bambi 10-07-2011 09:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7973980)
Well, since the Yankmees got greased last night, fanboy's obviously looking for a new super team bandwagon to hop on.
I'm a Royals fan you douche.

Not one of convenient Chiefs/Cardinals fans like you.

We've discussed this before.

vailpass 10-07-2011 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7974029)
I'm a Royals fan you douche.

Not one of convenient Chiefs/Cardinals fans like you.

We've discussed this before.
It's "convenience" Wickeddumb.

Frazod 10-07-2011 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7974029)
I'm a Royals fan you douche.

Not one of convenient Chiefs/Cardinals fans like you.

We've discussed this before.
Says the Yankmees season ticket holder who posted a picture of Texas' championship banners yesterday.

Eat shit, clown.

vailpass 10-07-2011 09:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7974036)
Says the Yankmees season ticket holder who posted a picture of Texas' championship banners yesterday.

Eat shit, clown.
WTF? Is this true? LMAO

Frazod 10-07-2011 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7974040)
WTF? Is this true? LMAO
You've never caught his "I live in New York, the rest of you suck" act? It's great. He'll really get on a roll, and then it seems like somebody whispers in his ear "Hey idiot, you're on a Chiefs board and you're from Kansas" and then he backpedals away as fast as he can.

And the Texas picture is buried in this pile of shit somewhere. He's been on a Texas kick lately - keeps mentioning them and KU together as if they're somehow on equal footing.

Apparently the Longhorns don't make a move without first seeking approval from their overlords in Lawrence. LMAO

vailpass 10-07-2011 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7974092)
You've never caught his "I live in New York, the rest of you suck" act? It's great. He'll really get on a roll, and then it seems like somebody whispers in his ear "Hey idiot, you're on a Chiefs board and you're from Kansas" and then he backpedals away as fast as he can.

And the Texas picture is buried in this pile of shit somewhere. He's been on a Texas kick lately - keeps mentioning them and KU together as if they're somehow on equal footing.

Apparently the Longhorns don't make a move without first seeking approval from their overlords in Lawrence. LMAO
LMAO


I've seen his attempt at a New Yorker attitude, at which he fails.
I've seen his one-trick pony of trying to make it seem like college hoops has anywhere near the same pull as college football.

But the Texas picture is hilarious news to me as is the UT equation. ****ing tool.
Instead of Stockholm Syndrome perhaps WickedDumb has Austin Syndrome.


I know it is your moral obligation as an MU Tiger to deplore KU but I have respect for KU and don't hold WickedDumb against them.

Pants 10-07-2011 09:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 7974092)
You've never caught his "I live in New York, the rest of you suck" act? It's great. He'll really get on a roll, and then it seems like somebody whispers in his ear "Hey idiot, you're on a Chiefs board and you're from Kansas" and then he backpedals away as fast as he can.

And the Texas picture is buried in this pile of shit somewhere. He's been on a Texas kick lately - keeps mentioning them and KU together as if they're somehow on equal footing.

Apparently the Longhorns don't make a move without first seeking approval from their overlords in Lawrence. LMAO
Are you talking about the picture of the basketball banners? I think that was just his attempt to show that Texas does care about basketball which was relevant to the argument at the time. I'm not sure that it proved him right, but I don't think it was to show solidarity between Texas and KU like you're implying.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again - I don't mind Texas making more money than Kansas. It doesn't mean I'm chugging Texas cock or anything, I'm just being a realist.

Saulbadguy 10-07-2011 09:55 AM
Is it DONE?

Quote:
cbsdollarbill Bill Jones
Pat Jones tells @bbjsports on @sportsanimal his SEC sources say Mizzou to SEC a "done deal" by end of day

Frazod 10-07-2011 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7974103)
Are you talking about the picture of the basketball banners? I think that was just his attempt to show that Texas does care about basketball which was relevant to the argument at the time. I'm not sure that it proved him right, but I don't think it was to show solidarity between Texas and KU like you're implying.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again - I don't mind Texas making more money than Kansas. It doesn't mean I'm chugging Texas cock or anything, I'm just being a realist.
Nobody's saying that you are. Apparently, that's Wickedson's job.

vailpass 10-07-2011 09:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 7974117)
Is it DONE?
If so I wish MU the best but man that just doesn't seem like a good fit culturally.

kchero 10-07-2011 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7974126)
If so I wish MU the best but man that just doesn't seem like a good fit culturally.
Agreed, Im a Mizzou fan and I may be in the minority here, but I would rather stay in the Big XII. With that being said, I am not convinced about the stability of this conference. Therefore, even though I feel we are a much better fit in the Big XII I cannot disagree with the decision to move to the SEC.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.
Page 48 of 138 « First 3844454647 48 495051525898 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.