I'm glad the Chiefs are making moves to ATTEMPT to improve. Say what you will, but the team is trying to IMPROVE. Nothing wrong with a little silver lining, now and then.

I don't think we're trying to emulate the Patriots, I think, we're trying to develop the team and call plays that put us in the best situation to improve the team overall.

Coaching does make a difference because motivators , know how to MOTIVATE. These coaches bring in instant credibilty and the players should be very receptive to going to work to attain the ultimate goal. We're coming off a 4 win season and making moves to help instill the philosophy with highly qualified candidates and some just want to piss on the parade.

I don't believe anybody here is so blind to think that this instantly makes us a contender, but rather closer to making us a better team. We need some quality coaches to take player's under their wings and help develop them, these guys bring a history of doing just that.

I'll take the 2010 coaching staff over the 2009 coaching staff, every day of the week.

Sadly, Mr. 'Hamas' Jenkins cannot dismount, Mr. Donger. His panties have twisted their dang selves onto the saddle horn. He is there and there he shall remain.

FAX

Whats the lastest on the Crennel thing any new developments today?

There is more than one type and more than one definition. I know this upsets your sophistry-laden schtick, but too damned bad.

That assumes I've ever paid attention to that smack.
I haven't, but carry on.

I'm sure I said that somewhere. Now if we could only find it...

Because if you opt to give the new regime time and are slower to form such concrete opinions...it means you haven't engaged in critical thought.
:rolleyes:

I've learned that it's impossible to argue with people who don't use logic as a standard of measurement.

This.

Having played the game competitively since I was 7 years old, I felt I had a pretty firm grasp of things.

But I learned something every day from this place, Parker especially.

Now, if I debate something, or jump into an argument, I do my best to present my case with facts, stats and evidence, like Parker did, to support my case.

Sadly, most people here aren't interested in learning or putting forth the effort. They'd rather negatively stereotype those that do.

So since you claim to be smarter than others, and act like you have the football knowledge, why don't you share it with others whom you feel don't have the knowledge in a polite intellegent way rather than screaming and being a dick about it and than going against them and arguing and complaining or keeping stuff to yourself?

This proves that you are a dick. So you take your words back and swallow them since you're basically showing to the rest of the world that you prove to not be worth the effort. I give up. No use in talking with you, you are one arrogant, angry, miserable, whinny little bastard. :shake:

No. Still supposedly tomorrow.

Mic I hope you take a step back and evaluate everything the "4horsemen" said during last offseason. As someone who argued aginst them I gotta say for the most part they were correct, however were they right long term about Cassel? That remains to be seen it'll probably be somewhere in between.

Shut up, pussy.

Don't lament about people bitching and rushing to judgment when a year ago you were calling Glenn Dorsey a bust halfway into his rookie year.

Furthermore, don't make false claims, like the fact that the Pats were built upon their special teams. They weren't. You can't back that up because it's patently false. No one has ever suggested or even alluded to that possibility before 15 minutes ago.

You deserve the level of respect consummate to the level of thought you put into these discussions: None.

Kindly **** yourself.

Okay. The commonly-accepted definition of intelligence is the ability to learn and/or cope with new situations and ideas. In other words, innate ability.

Intelligence isn't learned; you either have it or you don't.

I have no words.

You know, you wouldn't always have to shout that during the act if you'd stick a few fingers inside along with your pinky-sized dingus.

And I disagree with that reasoning because many top athletes are motivated by the environment, power, and competition not the money. Singletary has plenty of wealth, but he is still driven to compete just as he was as a player. People laugh at modern players who say, "I would play this game even if it was for free" (e.g. Ray Lewis), but I believe they mean what they say. Why else would someone like Shannarat return to coaching when money is not an issue?