Chris Meck |
06-13-2022 06:42 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
(Post 16330938)
I understand it. But the secondary benefits way more from a good pass rush than the pass rush benefits from a good secondary.
What would you rather have? An elite DE but average corners or an elite corner but average DEs? I bet you'd pick the former right? Especially when the secondary is filled with young players.
|
Alright last shot at trying to explain Veach's approach this off-season. I don't know why I'm bothering, but here goes.
If The Chiefs ranked 7th in pass rush win rate, meaning that your front 4 was defeating their blocks in 2.5 seconds yet not getting sacks what does that reflect?
It means that opposing QBs were able to find an open receiver in 2.5 seconds.
2.5 seconds is very quick. This would indicate that KC had real problems covering. The eye test tells us that Sorensen was particularly awful, and that Niemann was really useless also. Both were directly targeted repeatedly.
Ward was decent, but has never played the ball particularly well. Mathieu was not his prior self either.
It would appear that a serious effort was made to be able to cover longer than 2.5 seconds. A sack at less than 4 seconds would not be considered a 'coverage sack'. But if you can cover even a little better, the stats say KC would have a lot more sacks.
Will there be a learning curve with the young guys? Sure, more than likely. But is it also likely that just the increase in sheer athletic ability makes them better? It's hard to overstate just how shitty Sorensen and Niemann were. Poor athletes that also were constantly in the wrong place, taking poor angles to the ball, and whiffing on the tackles when they did manage to get there. ****ing terrible.
These new kids are FAR superior athletes, and the higher picks all have loads of experience. They're not projects. Karlaftis, McDuffie, Cook, and Chenal are NFL ready. Each are day one upgrades over the players they replace, even with some rookie mistakes.
|